The Morning Line
Which Will Crash First: Stocks or Bitcoin?
I’ll trash bitcoin in a moment — my new hobby — but first a yellow alert for everyone who thinks the stock market’s inevitable collapse is most likely to happen shortly after the first of the year. Although that seems quite plausible, fulfilling popular expectations is not how Mr Market usually works. Think how many lives he could wreck if the collapse were to begin any day now, at the height of Santa season. We should be especially cautious because premium levels for put options on the S&Ps have fallen to near-record lows. Although that does not tell us exactly when the crash is likely to begin, it does make one thing all but certain: The stock market’s initial plunge will be so breathtakingly swift and steep that put prices will soar in mere hours to stratospheric levels where no one will want to buy them. Count on it.
Concerning Bitcoin, I couldn’t resist the temptation to weigh in at WSJ.com after they ran an article last week that attributed Bitcoin’s extremely high price to ‘scarcity’. The headline drew the usual crowd of youths who seemed to agree. Reaching deep into market history, one of them helpfully pointed out that Bitcoin has outperformed all other investible assets over the last decade. Who knew?
Whatever he believes, it is indisputable that Bitcoin — unlike tulip bulbs, which can produce beautiful flowers — has an intrinsic value of zero. Granted, there’s nominal value of perhaps $2-$3 per token because the blockchain within which cryptos are created can be used to effect and record financial transactions securely. But $100,000? That’s absurd, considering Bitcoin cannot accomplish those tasks nearly as efficiently as credit cards or cash.
Violent Money?
And what kind of crazy ‘money’ explodes in value from five cents to a hundred thousand dollars, with $50,000 fluctuations along the way? Bitcoin’s psychotic instability is actually the main reason for its popularity. As such, it is used almost solely for speculation rather than for purchases, recalling the joke with the punchline: Those aren’t eatin’ sardines, mister, those are tradin’ sardines!
The big banks have cynically embraced Bitcoin because they have no skin in the game and because it adds liquidity to a global shell game they created to spin nearly unlimited quantities of ‘money’ from digital ones and zeroes. The argument that bitcoin has become worth so much because it is so scarce is precisely the same argument that was used in the 1600s to push the value of a single tulip bulb as high as a million dollars.
Bitcoin is methamphetamine for the vast multitudes who missed out on the boom in stocks and real estate. Now, an army of hucksters is offering these losers a second chance. Small wonder that more than a few of them should expect Bitcoin to reach $1 million or more. Bitcoin mania is a con-job, and it cannot but end the way Tulipmania did nearly 400 years ago.
The Herd Is Even More Fearless than in 1929
Skittish about the stock market’s manic climb? Consider moving some of your savings into T-bills, which are currently yielding around 4.25%. You could do worse. Some of my friends are reluctant to take e ven a little money off the table because 2024 was such an incredible year for them. One is a retired lawyer who racked up a nearly $500,000 gain in Nvidia. She sold enough shares to buy a condo in Palm Beach, but her portfolio is otherwise unchanged and showing a return of about 40% for the year. She and her financial advisor are confident her portfolio will do equally well next year.
Both of my siblings had a similar experience, but they have since moved most of their nest eggs into Treasury bonds and bills. It has been an extraordinary year for them, and for millions of Baby Boomers who owned stocks, real estate or both. Who could blame them for thinking that the bull market begun in 2009 might have another year or two left in it?
On the other hand, valuations are at their highest levels ever, and a real estate downturn seems all but certain because mortgage rates are stuck at levels too high to attract first-time buyers. And few would deny the stock market is out of its mind, a beast on steroids; we all sense this in our bones. Consider the way speculators have shrugged off ominous tariff news. Trump has threatened our two biggest trading partners, Mexico and Canada, with protectionist levies that would punish U.S. auto manufacturers in particular and cause grocery prices to surge anew. The President-elect also seems hell-bent on implementing immigration restrictions that would tighten the supply of workers, particularly for unskilled jobs.
He’s Bluffing, Right?
Toward the end of the Roaring Twenties, when Congress was debating passage of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, investors grew increasingly obsessed with headlines concerning the bill’s odds of becoming law. When it appeared to pick up support on Capitol Hill, stocks would fall; but when the protectionists seemed to lose ground, shares would rise. This time around, facing tariff measures that make Smoot-Hawley look benign in comparison, investors remain not merely unconcerned, but giddy. Stocks rise on most days regardless of tariff news and despite the strident efforts of economists and editorialists to convince us that Trump is about to goad the world into a trade war. Investors must think he’s bluffing, and perhaps he is. If not, don’t be surprised to see the broad averages, along with Bitcoin, get nuked a few months after he takes office.
Cut $2 Trillion from the U.S. Budget…or What?
Let’s hope Musk and Ramaswamy have been paying close attention to David Stockman’s ten-part series on how to cut the U.S. budget before America spends its way into bankruptcy. Stockman was Reagan’s budget director in 1981-85 and eminently qualified to spell out the tough reforms needed to force the U.S. to live within its means. He is no fan of Trump, to put it mildly, but he sees the Musk/Ramaswamy ‘DOGE’ project as America’s last chance to get spending under control. Musk famously asserted during the campaign that he could cut $2 trillion annually from a total federal budget of around $6 trillion. Although we’ve come to expect big things and even the impossible from Musk, in this case, even with the intrepid Ramaswamy aboard, DOGE may have bitten off more than it can chew.
Ironically, it is Stockman’s long, detailed list of cuts that makes Musk’s goal seem farfetched if not impossible. Stockton admits that eliminating nearly every U.S. department and agency you can think of, and laying off more than half-a-million government employees at the outset, would scarcely dent deficit spending that’s been pushing the national debt toward $40 trillion at a rate of more than $3 trillion per year. The list of 16 agencies Trump should axe as soon as he takes office in January includes the FBI, DEA, BATF, NHTSA, Legal Services Corp. and the Department of Education. Additionally, says Stockman, DOGE should shoot for 50% staff reductions in these fat cows: the SEC (2,250 workers, for savings of $360 million); FCC (750 workers, for savings of $120 million: FAA (22,500 workers, for savings of $3.6 billion); IRS (41,500 workers, for savings of $6.64 billion); National Labor Relations Board (800 workers, for savings of $130 million); Office of Personnel Management (1,250 staff, for savings of $314 million); Environmental Protection Agency (8,500 staff, for savings of $1.36 billion); NASA (9,000 staff, for savings of $1.4 billion); and the General Services Administration (6,500 staff, for savings of $1.04 billion).
Why Bother?
Total savings would amount to $264 billion, or just 0.33% of the $8.0 trillion of Federal spending projected by the Congressional Budget Office for 2029, DOGE’s target year. So why bother, especially when the political fallout from these relatively ‘modest’ cuts could trigger all-out war on Capitol Hill? Here Stockman states the obvious: If we can’t make it through a first round of serious reductions, America is doomed financially and economically.
Doubters may not have much time to dither about whether this is true, since even under the best circumstances, Medicare and Social Security will go belly-up long before the fiscally nettlesome Baby Boomers are safely in their graves. If you believe otherwise, you are implicitly arguing that Millennials and Gen-Xers who are living in their parents’ basements will somehow be able to pay the doctor bills of Boomers who live into their 80s or 90s, and to keep sending them inflation-adjusted Social Security checks every month. Both of these gargantuan programs are propped up precariously by asset inflation that will reverse when the stock market’s long bull-run ends. In such circumstances, the budget catastrophe Stockman says is all but inevitable could be upon us not in a few years, but in mere months or even weeks.
Let’s Execute a Few Internet Scammers!
Have you heard from “Cleo Kenmille” or “Caroline Johnson”? If not, consider yourself fortunate. Those are pseudonyms used by a crew of shitbags who work out of bucket shops that lie beyond the reach of international law. Their job is to steal money from you or anyone else who is familiar with PayPal, the online banker. Paypal itself is unconnected to the scam, although their familiar logo is used to entice the unwary (see above). The header on the scammer’s email — “A small reminder from Cleo Kenmille” — should arouse the suspicion of anyone who is even slightly wised-up about phishing scams. Since when did banks start sending out emails featuring in the headline the specific name of an individual to whom you or I supposedly owe money? This email did, though, explicitly identifying “Cleo Kenmille” as the aggrieved party. The implicit message is: “Pay her now!”
Or…what? Although that question begs a stupid answer, someone might absent-mindedly fall for this grift, since the email cautions the recipient to call 888 232-0407 if he or she doesn’t recognize Cleo’s name. A friend of mine dialed the number and was connected to a surly man with an Indian accent. He somehow persuaded my friend to download an app that promised to “get this mess straightened out”. Next thing you know, she was logged onto a phony PayPal site that listed several bitcoin transactions, including one for $98,000. Nervous and distressed, she hung up. But not before she’d given the thieves enough information to enable them to generate a very real message in her Charles Schwab account concerning a “pending” $130,000 wire transfer of her savings to a bank in Dubai. My friend immediately instructed Schwab to lock the account, changed a bunch of passwords, then waited for the other shoe to drop. It didn’t, presumably because the scammers would have needed one more phone conversation to trick her into releasing the funds.
Global Crime Wave
If you are a frequent internet user, you’ll alreaady know that the World Wide Web has helped spawn a global crime wave so pervasive and persistent that one might suspect there are many millions of scammers in our midst. Search the retail sector, for one, and you’ll be challenged to find more than a handful of categories that are not dominated by crooks, cheats and liars. Craig’s List seems to attract the worst of them, including actual rapists, robbers and murderers. Online dating services are filled with phony profiles, and even Amazon is wholeheartedly on board, lending their coveted ‘Amazon’s Choice’ endorsement to shady companies that sell shoddy merchandise made in China under a score of company names. The makers will typically offer a 30-day guarantee, which of course is when Amazon’s guarantee ends. I discovered after ordering a high-intensity flashlight that stopped working after 30 days that Amazon didn’t even have contact information for the company they had rated so highly.
It is nearly impossible to catch internet scammers, let alone bring them to justice. I offered investigative help to the local police when a scammer advertised a South Florida apartment with a pay-in-advance deal that sounded too good to be true. This was a potential $14,000 con, but the chief of detectives was too busy to be bothered.
The only way to mitigate the 24/7 orgy of fraud on the Internet is to arrest, try and execute a few dozen perps. I’m convinced there would be strong bipartisan support for this — not just among voters, but on Capitol Hill. Track down a slew of these sociopaths and sentence them to die in the electric chair. When enough of them have taken the hot squat, their shitbag colleagues will get the message. The world will be a better place without them.
Bitcoin Leaps Above the Hubbub
The headline on last week’s commentary asked whether it might be morning in America, but the left’s combative reaction to the drubbing they received on November 5 suggests we could be closer to high noon. We may know soon, since the forces of darkness are going full-tilt against Matt Gaetz, Trump’s choice for Attorney General. Wikipedia, while discreetly neglecting to mention Hitler, trotted out a laundry list of dubious citations implying that Gaetz, a Florida Congressman, is a right-wing crazy, sex pervert and a deadbeat. In their dreams, perhaps, for he is actually an avenging angel, intent on rooting out every rat and cockroach in the Justice Department and ending the U.S. Government’s increasingly common practice of arresting and imprisoning people because of their conservative political views.
It would look suspicious if Deep State were to take a potshot at Gaetz after failing twice to bring down Mr. Trump with bullets. Whatever their plan, they’ll have the pathetically diminished but as-yet-unhumbled voice of the New York P.O.S. Times to cheer them on. Here’s the editorial page with a delusional take on the election that makes clear why the Gray Lady might not even be around in ten years: “Many Democrats were considering how to navigate a dark future, with the party unable to stop Mr. Trump from carrying out a right-wing transformation of American government. Others turned inward, searching for why the nation rejected them. They spoke about misinformation and the struggle to communicate the party’s vision in a diminished news environment inundated with right-wing propaganda.”
Humble Beginnings
On Wall Street, Trumpmania experienced a mild setback last week. However, because investors are too revved up to have second thoughts about anything, the feeble decline over five consecutive days should be attributed to the pull of gravity. Stocks were due for a correction, and they obliged as innocuously as possible. If there was anything to worry about, it was Bitcoin’s deranged leap to a record 93,495. Speculators holding out for more — perhaps much more ($1 million?) — shouldn’t let greed cloud their judgment. My technical forecast, viewable on the Rick’s Picks home page (see below), calls for a potentially important top at either 107,670 or 119,253. Not too shabby, considering this still-valueless form of supposed money traded freely for a dime before engaging the proletarian mind in mid-2011.
What If It Really Is Morning in America?
I’ve been confidently anticipating the Mother of All Tops since, like, around 1975, but this week I decided to go wholeheartedly with the flow. The result, technically speaking, is a robustly optimistic S&P target at 7644.50. This might not be what permabears want to hear, but it will leave bulls sufficient room to deal with their psychotic delusions once and for all before boom turns to bust. The rally would amount to 1600 points, or 27%, and come on top of an extraordinarily steep rally begun two years ago that has pushed valuations to near-record levels.
Some would say the relentless uptrend has discounted whatever miracles Donald Trump could conceivably produce for the economy. Putting that question aside, his bullish impact already on the mood of America cannot be underestimated. For starters, Trump’s plan to dismember Deep State sounds do-able, especially if Republicans retain control of the House. Click here to read all about how heads are actually going to roll.
There is no precedent for taking on the embedded bureaucrats who have worked tirelessly for decades to wreck everything that is good about America. Sending these traitors to the gallows, so to speak, promises to be at the heart of Trump’s domestic agenda. It will be interesting to see whether the ideologues who invent the news at the New York Times and the Washington Post eventually concede that Deep State even exists. They purport that it is a creature of right-wing paranoia, even though they have aggressively supported Deep State’s reign of terror editorially for decades.
Term-Limit ‘Bonus’
The President-elect’s ten-point plan even includes full-on support for term limits. This issue should have become a bipartisan favorite, but for the fact that the left has been too busy hating Trump to get behind it. Now, it would seem, the years-long effort to add term limits to the U.S. Constitution will be unstoppable. Arguably, it has always been the single best way to keep influence peddlers from becoming entrenched on Capitol Hill, as they always have been. The opportunity for decent Americans to throw the rascals out is probably worth a thousand S&P points, so don’t be shocked if Wall Street delivers that and more.
A Canny Silver Bull Trades Ingots for T-Bonds
[The author of this week’s commentary is an old friend who worked his way up from exchange-floor clerk to commercial real estate mogul over the time I’ve known him. He has demonstrated remarkable timing, courage and patience as an investor, buying commercial real estate at the bottom of the 2007-08 crash and holding it until two years ago, when an even bigger crash that shows no sign of abating began. He also started accumulating a large position in physical silver as it fell from around $30 in early 2021 to $17 a year-and-a-half later. He recently cashed out his entire position at upwards of $33 an ounce, roughly doubling his stake. Now he is striking out in a radical new direction, deploying a large portion of his sizable gains in the most unpopular investment of the day, Treasury paper. Although no investor is infallible, my friend has never had a misstep with a series of all-in bets.
Coincidentally, or perhaps not, Comex Gold has fallen nearly $60 after coming within $1.60 of a 2803.40 target I started drum-rolling in September, when prices were $300 lower. Is the top in? It’s too early to tell, but even if higher prices are coming, anyone who has held bullion during its steep run-up since last October could not go far wrong by taking a partial profit at these levels. RA ]
Each time a massive wealth transfer occurs, it is caused not by an upward explosion in asset prices, but by crushing deflation such as we experienced in 2007-8. It’s about to happen again, and not with a puny, garden-variety bear-market or recession, but with the epic crash that we have all known was coming sooner or later. The list of possible catalysts boggles the imagination, to wit: a politically wrenching transition to a second Trump term; a full-blown, bloody civil war that pits neighbor against neighbor; World War III, featuring the detonation of an electromagnetic pulse weapon over the Middle East; a Chinese blockade of Taiwan; a massive solar flare that extinguishes life on Earth; Buffett raising cash to record levels; Musk cutting Federal outlays by $2 trillion; a Covid die-off. That’s a lot of deflationary bullets to dodge, and the list is hardly complete. Who knows which of these dreadnoughts is about to throw the world into chaos? I’m betting ‘something’ is about to happen simply because stocks have been soaring for no good reason for too long, and because an event that will shock investors back to their senses is long overdue.
Never Fade the Sage
If you’re still reading this, whether for belly laughs or because you enjoy doomsday porn, let me get to the point: I’m selling many thousands of ounces of gold and silver that I’ve accumulated over the last decade and putting the proceeds into Treasury paper. That’s right: I’m liquidating a large hoard of Silver Eagles and bars, along with all of my gold, and going to Full Faith & Credit in preparation for the black swan’s arrival.
What will it look like? No one knows, as I acknowledged above. But I’m betting that the renowned Sage of Omaha might be the tell. He’s sitting on more than $250 billion in cash, and punting B of A stock like it’s fourth and 20. Additionally, Elon Musk, who by all accounts benefits more than nearly anyone from Government handouts for his space program, has literally bet his freedom on a second Trump term. During recent campaign appearances, Musk said we are broke and need to reduce fiscal outlays by $2 trillion, or a third. In case you forgot, Musk bought Twitter, fired 90% of the employees, and recently proposed lending his ‘shitcoin’ acronym DOGE to create an accountability division of the Federal government.
Realize that most crashes occur at the start of new presidential administrations. Before you put me down as a political partisan, though, let me note that I see almost no difference between Democrats and Republicans — aka donkeys and elephants. They are all feral animals that inhabit the Washington jungle, as far as I’m concerned. Politics aside, I believe this is the perfect opportunity to rebuke the reckless behavior that has powered the bull market since the Covid era. I hope I’m wrong, at least about the magnitude of the coming bear market, but I am convinced that the sky really is about to fall.
An Election Week Scenario
You can always tell when portfolio managers are hard at play, immersed in an epic circle jerk that has become more tediously familiar with each passing week. And so it went on Friday, as money migrated for no discernible reason from certain, temporarily disfavored stocks to flavor-of-the-day hotties. It seemed almost as though the chimpanzees who purport to manage everyone’s money were on a conference call that morning, scripting a narrative simple enough for Jim Cramer to shill to the legions of widows and pensioners addicted to his show. The Dow was down more than 300 points at its lows, even as the lunatic-sector stocks — you know them as the idiotically misnamed ‘Magnificent Seven’ — winked at the thrashing their poor cousins were getting on less sexy exchanges. The Naz was borne aloft as always by light volume and timid resistance. Bears evidently were too gutless to resist the uptrend, which in recent weeks has become increasingly confident of a Trump victory.
4% Above Sits Trouble
Even so, there is a palpable feeling that the stock market has been nutso for so long that it’s overdue for a sea change. That could mean irrational exuberance will peak on or around election day. But Mr Market could also surprise with a rally that turns even steeper than the one that has prop-washed the flesh from sane observers and skeptics.
So which? The chart above makes a compelling case for something in-between. The 6102 S&P target lies 256 points, or 4.4%, above Friday’s close. It would not be as large a gain in points as occurred in August or September. However, if the top were to coincide with the November 5 election, the entire gain would have occurred in just seven trading days. That looks like a good bet, but I would not recommend sticking around for the rest of the week as toga fever rages on Wall Street. The chart says clearly that a big move into election day could be a bull trap and therefore a time for extra caution. Please note that the target will not likely work precisely because it comes from a blended, continuous chart. Even so, it can be expected to show stopping power at or very near 6100.
Investors Go All-In for Trump
Wall Street has gone all-in for Trump, piling up such extravagant gains in the last few weeks that one might wonder what bold miracles investors expect of him. More likely, unfortunately, is that within a year or two of taking office, he will be overwhelmed by the collapse of a financial bubble that required only the hubris of America’s promised return to greatness to set it in motion. Let’s hope Mr. Trump gets a chance to clean house first, since Washington is a rat’s nest of corruption and plots to bring down America. In the meantime, there is no arguing that the rampaging stock market has got it wrong in predicting that Harris, along with the malignant political philosophy and crackpot schemes she represents, will be overwhelmingly repudiated by voters on November 5. With a gusher of mail-in ballots already pouring in and millions of illegals ready to lend their signatures to the Democrats, it could take weeks or longer to adjudicate the results. Regardless, Trump is riding a wave so powerful that even if the Democrats double the cheating that won them the White House in 2020, they will still come up short. Liberals should listen to Harris’s recent interview on Fox with Bret Baier to understand why she can’t possibly win. She comes across as so empty and insipid that a conservative could almost wax nostalgic for Hillary’s evil cunning and brass cojones.
‘A Small Price to Pay’
The biggest problem Trump will inherit lies in the Middle East, not Ukraine. He and Putin are neither friends nor enemies but seem to respect each other. This cannot be said of jihadis Trump must confront and what remains of their leadership. Israel has wiped out the terrorists’ command structure, and we should expect them to try desperately to settle the score, possibly once and for all. A nuclear bomb would not necessarily be the Ayatollah’s weapon of choice since it could risk killing tens or even hundreds of millions of Muslims while making the planet uninhabitable. In the eyes of some hard-core clerics, this would be a small price to pay for extinguishing the last Jew. A biological weapon would be far easier to deploy, although the risk of accidentally annihilating humanity would be greater than with a nuclear bomb. However, if the goal of the crazies is to wipe out Jews at any cost, a bioweapon cannot be ruled out. It’s impossible to say how Trump would react or even whether the alarmingly clueless Harris might somehow have the instincts to preserve a vestige of humanity sufficient to start civilization over again. Any such concerns are unlikely to register on Wall Street, however. As long as there is no mushroom cloud billowing over the Battery, investors will focus raptly on the minutes of the latest FOMC meeting, even if it might be the last.
Kamala Unwinding
[I can’t stomach news reports that take Kamala Harris’s candidacy seriously, especially articles suggesting with brazen implausibility that she is polling dead-even with Trump in some important swing states. Fortunately for those creeped out by all the tilted campaign coverage, my colleague James Howard Kunstler has compressed everything you need to know about the election into a bold, Menckenesque essay that will dazzle you with its insightfulness. He offers three scenarios, two of which could bring America to the brink of civil war. Fortunately, the third, a Trump landslide, seems the most likely and would give Americans a chance to snuff Deep State for good before it can recover from the blow. With Jim’s kind permission, here is Kamala Unwinding, his latest Clusterfuck Nation essay on substack. RA]
***
“. . . we are facing a catastrophic collapse of governance. With democracy reduced to a tragedy or a farce (probably both things). . . .” — Ugo Bardi
<<<<< >>>>>
“As the US increasingly resembles ancient Rome, being president is more and more dangerous. Something around 35 emperors met violent deaths, most from people in and around their courts. In other words, members of the Roman Deep State. An ugly situation is brewing in and around Washington DC.” — Doug Casey
*****
Don’t kid yourself: Kamala Harris does not want to be President of the United States. She doesn’t even want the ceremonial stuff, the incessant shuffling from one photo op to the next, the tedious Easter egg rolls, the prayer meetings, the turkey pardonings, the tiresome state banquets for men in strange headgear who are unfamiliar with using the fork and knife, and forbidden to sip chardonnay. . . .
It’s obvious she has been played for a chump, that she was sandbagged into play-acting “the candidate” by an odd coalition of the distraught and the desperate — that is, the many agency blobsters who fear prison and the perfidious politicians such as Pelosi, Schumer, Mitch the Turtle, the Clintons, and Obama, paid to cover for the blob, often doing it badly, who fear the judgment of history, as well as the loss of their fortunes. Distraught and desperate characters make foolish decisions.
The Black Spot
About thirty seconds after “Joe Biden” vowed to stay in the 2024 race, a delegation of these panicked pols paid him a call and passed him the black spot, knowing he could not credibly front for the massive election cheat underway. He was barely able to front for the previous one in 2020, when every lever of power got pulled to-the-max to conceal the truth about the steal, and to severely punish those who dared to murmur doubts about the election’s freeness and fairness.
How did they decide that Kamala would do any better? I assure you we will find out when the party explodes in recriminations sometime after November 5. It will probably turn out to look like the 2017 movie, The Death of Stalin, a frantic vaudeville of scheming buffoons oblivious to mundane doings of the suffering nation they pretend to serve. Unlike Nikita Khrushchev in 1953, Kamala did not prevail among this gang of squabbling clowns by force of personality or guile. She was merely a default setting as veep, arrived at to present the illusion of continuity and solidarity where none existed. She was not even involved in the backstage action. I doubt that anyone even asked her if she wanted the assignment — she was only notified after-the-fact. Thus, all the drinking.
Is ‘The Steal’ on Again?
The outstanding question: will the Democratic Party actually go ahead and attempt to execute an election steal despite growing evidence of a developing Trump landslide that might obviate it? The works are already in motion. The mail-in ballots went out long ago and early votes are getting cast by the day. The overseas ballots that require no US address or voter verification are flooding in by the millions and four years of open borders has 10-million illegal aliens (at a minimum) dispersed around the nation, great gobs of them planted in swing states, processed through the DMVs and social services — with the requisite automatic voter registration — their ballots already pre-bundled for harvest.
It could go a few ways. One is, just let’er rip, harvest all those fake votes, stuff the drop-boxes, flood the zone, and do it all right in America’s face as if to say: we can do whatever we want. . . to get whatever we want. . . and you can’t stop us. That is probably the point where blue America finds out exactly what the Second Amendment was designed for. You might also expect a whole lot of state-organized resistance, especially in the populous red ones, Texas, Florida, real court cases over fraud this time, contested certification.
High Court Could Decide
Or, the election could come out a hopeless unresolvable muddle. There’s no precedent for this and no provision in the Constitution, but you can imagine the Supreme Court having to decide a necessary do-over minus all recent gimmicks, paper ballots only, voters with proof of citizenship only, all voting on one re-scheduled election day before January 1. This novelty would be something apart from the clunky Congressional machinery established for settling electoral college disputes, since it is predicated on various states’ inability to determine their electoral college vote in the first place, based on patent irregularity and fraud.
You could also imagine a period of disorder so deep and grave that the regime behind “Joe Biden” declares martial law. . . or, alternately the military — the martial institution — has to take matters into its own hands, shoving aside even “Joe Biden” and his filthy retinue. Appalling to consider, I’m sure, but these things happen in history, and the Party of Chaos has set enough mischief in motion to wreck the election and wreck the country. Call it catastrophizing, if you will. There it is.
Trump Is on a Roll
But to step back from that abyss, it appears that Mr. Trump’s momentum accelerates by the day, that he is becoming, at last, an implacable, irresistible juggernaut who will, perforce, overcome all the gimmicks, traps, and frauds arrayed against him. Kamala seems to think so. Have you ever seen such resignation, such loserdom-in-action as her recent performance on CBS’s 60-Minutes, or her pitiful admission on ABC’s The View that she couldn’t think of anything she would do differently beyond the excellent management of national affairs under “Joe Biden” (and herself as veep). Surely that said it all. She has nothing, brings nothing.
Long ago, she was a pretty girl with a law degree and an infectious laugh on the fringes of local politics in San Francisco. The winds of fortune blew her this way and that way until she ended up way over her head, used by the reprobates around her as a mere device to stay out of jail. She ends as an historical prank on her own country. It must be deeply demoralizing to be used like that in front of the whole world.