The Morning Line

Some of you may remember Gary Liebowitz, a troll that I 86'd from the site years ago. He still harangues me now and then, and I am saddened to report that his rage has only worsened, especially where Trump is concerned. Here's a pungent note from Gary that just plopped into my email box. I am reprinting it here because it casts him in a role he was born to play: useful idiot. Your deflationary theory has already been proven wrong as the current market is careening towards a TOP as it and YOU ignore the real signs of a 40-year INFLATIONARY Cycle that has started. As predicted by Warren Buffet himself when discussing cycles. He acknowledged this pattern.  The dollar is moving UP (WITH) rising Inflation.  10-year note will oblige.  In an election year the FED will be FORCED to sit on its hand even if clear signs of inflation are seen. Your refusal to accept the current reality matches you love of a fascist.  From Rape, extortion, sedition, and treason there is no act Trump can commit that will allow you to change your mind.  Rigid fanatical cult-like thinking is always a prescription for disaster. But since 50% of this nation believe as you, I can only conclude the recent fascist Hitler with his 12 year reign is more common and repetitive than anyone thought possible. Millennials' Burden Gary hasn't gotten everything wrong. I'd have to concede, for one, that I did not foresee the current round of inflation. However, I still believe that a catastrophic deleveraging -- aka deflation -- is the only mechanism through which public debts that long ago ceased to be repayable can be discharged. The inevitable bear market in stocks, postponed by fiscal and credit stimulus of almost unimaginable proportions for far longer

The chart above shows RCA's spectacular climb to the Mother of All Tops in 1929. The larger chart that frames it shows what Nvidia shares would have to do to replicate the peaks and troughs that set up RCA's plunge into hell. Notice that the stock's final top (#4) was just marginally higher than one recorded six months earlier. NVDA's chart would look nearly identical if the stock were to hit 1000 in May. It got a potential running start on this with last week's 120-point leap to 877.35. Nvidia is the dominant supplier of hardware and software for AI and makes a good comparison with RCA. The latter had a commanding position in one of the hottest games in town, home entertainment. The company's console radios and record players provided a big step up from the days when a spinet piano in the parlor was the main source of music in the home. How Hot Is Nvidia? So how hot is Nvidia? Two months ago, it became the third company in U.S. history to achieve a $2 trillion valuation. Moreover, it reached that benchmark just 180 days after hitting the $1 trillion mark. That compares with 500 days for the two biggest companies, Apple and Microsoft. Nvidia is also regarded as one of the most exciting places to work in Silicon Valley at a time when many firms have been downsizing. Half of the firm's workers reportedly made more than $228,000 last year. The company's hold on investors' imagination of the future has produced a buying mania in the stock that is every bit as heated as the one that occurred in RCA nearly a century ago. Will their charts ultimately coincide, implying a bloodbath ahead? Quite possibly not, especially if the coincident charts become too widely observed in

The portfolio managers who rig the markets appear to be losing their touch. Usually, they are able to short-squeeze stocks in the 'lunatic sector' -- our label for the egregiously mis-named 'Magnificent Seven' -- when earnings are announced after the close.  This quasi-criminal manipulation can add hundreds of billions of dollars to the world's 'wealth effect' in a literal blink of an eye when it occurs in a mega-cap stock such as NVDA or AAPL. But the greedy con-game conspicuously failed to 'grow wealth' on Friday after Netflix reported adding droves of new subscribers in the previous quarter. The good news supposedly caught dull-witted analysts by surprise, even though a half-smart chimpanzee could have seen it coming after Netflix put the screws to millions of viewers who had been using friends' passwords. The stock should have vaulted into outer space, since, in a bull market, all earnings announcements are treated as wildly bullish regardless of whether the news is actually bullish. That's how bull markets work. Not This Time Not this time, though, Instead of taking the obligatory short-squeeze leap into outer space, Netflix feebly head-faked to stop out a $640 peak from ten days earlier by a paltry $1. That peak and Friday's slightly higher one merely dented a Hidden Pivot resistance at 634.14 that we'd told subscribers a couple of weeks ago could cap the bull-market. On Friday, if everything had gone according to the script after earning were announced, the stock should have begun to gyrate wildly, allowing DaBoyz to work the swings like killer whales herding dolphins. Lo, NFLX simply continued to fall, ending the day $90 below the fake-out high. Ordinarily, we wouldn't read too much into DaBoyz' failure to hold NFLX aloft so that they could distribute millions of shares to widows, pensioners and

The devastating bear market in Treasury paper since 2020 may be nearing an end. I was pessimistic about this myself when TLT, an exchange-traded fund, that tracks the long bond, broke down last week. But a bigger picture saw this as occurring in the context of a market that may have bottomed last October. The bounce from that low triggered a theoretical 'buy' signal in bonds in mid-December when it touched the green line shown in the chart. Don't expect a meteoric rise, however, since it could take a while for T-Bonds to build a base for a sustained move higher. Assuming the 107^04 low holds, however, the worst may be over. That would imply that long-term rates, currently at 4.53% for 30-Year T-Bonds and 4.38% for the 10-Year Note, have peaked. In any event, I do not expect them to exceed the highs they achieved in October at, respectively,  4.99% and 5.15%. Debt's Real Cost I should point out that this is not necessarily cause for jubilation, especially if recession causes asset values to deflate. That would return us to the financial environment of the 2007-08 Crash, when even 4% mortgages placed a crushing burden on homeowners whose property values had gone underwater. It is real rates -- yield minus inflation -- that ultimately matter, not nominal rates. Unfortunately, there is no escaping the debts we have amassed publicly and privately, and there are reasons to strongly doubt that those who owe will get to stiff creditors via hyperinflation or even sustained inflation. Regardless, and irrespective of the nominal level of rates, payback will exact a heavy toll on future production and our standard of living.

[Many readers of these weekly commentaries may not be aware that the focus of Rick's Picks each day is on timely trading ideas. Below is chat room banter for a typical 'freaky Friday'. The discussion includes several trades that were posted ahead of actionable opportunities in a few stocks, including McDonald's, Tesla and Amazon. All the links are live, most of them displaying charts with the ABCD patterns we use to trade. Some display two key pieces of the pattern: Hidden Pivot midpoints (p) and targets (D).  For some of you, the jargon might take a little getting used to. However, trade instructions are usually phrased so that even beginners can follow them. There is a separate chat room called the Coffee House for off-topic conversations where 'anything goes'. IF you'd like to sample Rick's Picks, click here for a free two-week trial subscription. RA ] Microsoft's Hat-Trick 8:55 Rick: MSFT setting up for a hat-trick of mechanical winners -- or will it be a rare failure? 09:00 Formula382: Looks like a trampoline Rick. Ya need that energy to get the bouncy bounce. 09:52 Rick: I just sent out a tout update for MSFT that offers a perspective on the bounce. 10:03 Formula382: Anyone in here have any idea how nat gas sits in the dumpster while the pipelines have been quite good to own for example, KMI, OKE, KYN, FCG. I own them all, but that was based on the predication that "surely nat gas has to go up", which it has not! 10:07 Spartacus: McDonald's... A trouper 10:14 Rick: Here's my MickeyD prognosis 10:22 Spartacus: Now Short NVDA and TSLA using Apr 12 puts 10:23 Spartacus: MCD Thanks Rick I think I will cover off of that chart 10:23 Ronbl: Gold is obviously going to go up but

[My colleague Charles Hugh Smith is a true outside-the-box thinker who tackles big questions with intellectual rigor and bold imagination. In the commentary below, he explains why neither our political system nor technological wizardry have been able to solve problems that threaten to topple the global economy and destroy our quality of life.  You can support excellence by subscribing to his blog, Of Two Minds, on Patreon.  RA] We say we want solutions, but we actually want a specific subset of solutions: those that already meet with our approval. The possibility that none of these pre-approved solutions will actually resolve the problem is rejected because we are wedded to the solutions that we want to work. The sources of our resistance to admitting that our solution is now the problem are self-evident: holding fast to an ideological certainty gives us inner security, as it provides a simplified, easy-to-grasp frame of reference, an explanation of how the world works and a wellspring of our identity. Our ideological certainties also serve as our moral compass: we believe what we believe because it is correct and therefore the best guide to solving all problems faced by humanity. If we frame all problems ideologically (i.e. politically), then there is always an ideological "solution" to every problem. If we frame all problems as solvable with technology, then there is always a technological "solution" to every problem. If we frame all problems as solvable with finance, then there is always a financial "solution" to every problem. In each of these cases, we're starting with the solution and then framing the problem so it aligns with our solution.  This is not actually problem-solving, and so the solutions--all blunt instruments--fail to actually resolve the complex, knotty problems generated by dynamic open systems with interconnected feedback loops. Self-interest also

The Fed's main job supposedly is to manage our expectations. But have Powell & Co. painted themselves into a corner? At the moment, it would appear that investors have no clue what to expect from the Fed. That wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing, except that their default mode has been to push stocks with multitrillion dollar capitalizations into unsustainably steep rallies. This trend is growing more dangerous and delusional by the week, and even a slight feint toward monetary clarity by policymakers could pop the bubble, turning an economic boom quickly into a global downturn. Meanwhile, the Fed's credibility suffers every time they suggest inflation is mellowing. What their hemming and hawing suggest in reality is that no one on the Open Market Committee has bought gas or groceries in a long time. Stocks have been in an unnaturally steep climb since October, and no one would be surprised to see it end.  Yeah, you've heard that before. But we'll continue to serve up bear market porn anyway because the bullish case is too stupid and boring to write about. However bullish you might be, let's face it: Stocks do not remotely deserve to be trading at these levels, and only an imbecile or someone paid to lie about it would argue otherwise. Lunatic Sector So how soon might we expect the market to go into a hellish dive? The chart above suggests the S&P Index could make an important top just 2.6% above these levels. We like the target because there is so little drama in the chart pattern that produced it. However, before we infer that the end is nigh, we need to put aside the fact that some key stocks in the lunatic sector -- specifically Microsoft, Nvidia and Facebook -- have already topped within a

For nearly a year, I've promoted the idea that the post-covid bull rampage would end when Microsoft shares hit $430. They effectively achieved that benchmark on Friday with a pre-dawn print at 428.95 that gave way to a $16 plunge. If this was not THE top, it certainly felt like A top, and a potentially important one. However, before we draw any conclusions, let's see if the selloff gets legs, since we don't want to underestimate the power of a market that has been in the grip of mass psychosis since October. If there were any doubt about this, consider how stocks have rallied into the Fed's decision to stay tight even after investors had deluded themselves into expecting aggressive easing in 2024. Originally I'd picked Apple as our infallible bellwether, because it is the most valuable company in the world, and because its shares are so heavily owned by institutions. But so are Microsoft's, with a key difference:  Although iPhone sales are poised to implode in the severe economic downturn that's coming, Microsoft is unlikely to feel much pain even in the hardest of times. That's because revenues from Microsoft 365 will continue to flow from more than 60 million subscribers, regardless of the economy's condition. The company's earnings are nearly bomb-proof, and that it is why it is arguably the best stock in the world to own, as well as the most important stock to follow. When it is rising strongly, the broad averages cannot fall; if it falls, it will take the broad averages with it. What If? However, the technical picture is not complete without considering the very bullish chart of the S&P 500. It says that before the 15-year-old bull market ends, the S&Ps are likely to hit 6118.34, a 20% gain from current levels.

Bitcoin mania looks likely to blow itself out at somewhat higher levels. The bitcoin ETF chart above suggests buyers will encounter significant resistance at 64.95, a Hidden Pivot target that lies 5% above Friday's closing price. If this impediment gives way easily or is exceeded for two consecutive weeks on a closing basis, however, you can expect more upside to the alternative target at 70.35.  That's fully 14% above these levels, and although that might seem to portend a powerful move, especially if it occurs in a matter of days, it would probably come as a huge disappointment to countless bitcoin fanatics who have been weaned and nurtured on predictions of $100,000 or more. I doubt we'll see anything like that, especially since the shitballs who control bitcoin, Black Rock chief among them, will have reaped more than their directors could spend in a thousand lifetimes if it climbs 'only' another 14% . It is for their benefit that regulators approved bitcoin ETFs in the first place, making the cryptocurrency affordable to riff-raff who had been priced out of the market even at its bear-market low near $15,000 in January 2023.  Fractional ownership, including with leveraged options, made it possible for kids who were collecting Pokemon cards just a few years ago to become players in the global casino. Virtual Tulips It's hard to imagine how high tulip-bulb prices would have climbed if Dutch teenagers had had access to virtual tulips in 1637, when the mania peaked. We are going to find out, though, when the crypto blowoff sputters out, as all manias eventually do, for lack of greater fools. In the meantime, here's a link to a recent interview I did with Howe Street's Jim Goddard. It explains why bitcoin would be more reasonably priced at $1-$2 instead of