The Morning Line

[The following commentary was written by Steve Houck,a longtime investor in bullion and knows the markets well.  He is also a friend and a former business partner.  RA ] Looking at the froth in silver, it became apparent it was time to rotate from overvalued to undervalued once again.  Selling precious-metal ETFs like SLV and AGQ meant cash was available for the next trade, but where to go?  While silver has been on a relentless tear, the miners have only grudgingly moved higher.  Yes, there have been good moves in many of the miners, but quite a few trade with a ball and chain weighing them down in the form of fear.  That's because the last two times silver surpassed $50, in 1980 and 2011, it collapsed and went into long, grinding bear markets.  Silver mining stocks get caught up in this because the public doesn't believe prices will hold, and that silver will fall back to earth. But what if the new floor is $55 to $70, and not the $15 to $25 range that obtained for decades?  This silver run-up is different because it’s about one thing:  physical metal.  Just look what;s happening: China, the U.S. and the rest of the world are hoarding and trying to secure metals. That puts the miners in the catbird seat, because they produce and control the supply.  Their shares, however, are still being priced as though silver were selling in the  $20s even though it averaged close to $50 for the entire fourth quarter 2025.  The miners wil start to report earnings next week, beginning on February 16.  Because many of them will announce blowout earnings, now is the time to capitalize! How to Play It How to play this?  Over the last two decades of investing in silver miners, the

Pity the J-school rookies who are paid to explain why the stock market did what it did on a given day. On Thursday, Microsoft shares lost nearly a half-a-trillion dollars of value. But why? Bloomberg's Evening Briefing called it a 'rap on the knuckles' for the company's huge spending on AI projects that seem increasingly unlikely to pay off. But isn't a rap on the knuckles the way nuns used to deal with minor behavioral lapses in young boys? If so, then Microsoft deserved 40 lashes with a rattan cane. Although the story was treated by the hacks who wrote it as a news event, what it portends is nothing short of financial calamity, reported in daily installments. For it is not just Microsoft that has squandered hitherto unimaginable sums on failing AI projects, but a dozen other corporate behemoths, including lunatic-sector (aka 'Magnificent Seven') stalwarts Amazon, Google, Facebook, Nvidia and Tesla. Analysts have projected total global AI spending of $2.6 trillion across all companies and markets in 2026. Here's where the math gets interesting. Microsoft share of those outlays would be an estimated $140 billion. Investors knocked three times that from the company's valuation last week, while also imploding the world's gaseous 'wealth effect' by a rich but still-invisible multiple. If equal punishment were to be inflicted on the companies planning to spend the $2.6 trillion, the haircut would amount to nearly $8 trillion. That is arguably the approximate size of the AI deflation that lies just ahead, and it will activate a black hole that could double or triple losses in other classes of investible assets. Treasury paper will go bounding in the other direction, finally getting some respect as a safe haven. When to Take Heart Granted, neither the math nor the logic is airtight. But the

If you can't guess what commodity the chart shows, you must be living on Mars. It is in fact a long-term picture of silver, which went ballistic in December.  The price has doubled since, blowing out a $50 top that had stood since 1980. That price became a part of silver's legend, since it is where one of the wealthiest men in the world, oil tycoon Nelson Bunker Hunt, met his financial Waterloo. With his brothers, Lamar and William, 'Bunky' had attempted to corner the market by buying up silver and futures contracts amounting to about a third of the world's supply.  Comex regulators responded by raising margin requirements so high that there were just two players left in the game: the Hunts and Eastman Kodak, a huge industrial user of silver. From a record $50.45 per ounce, the price plunged by half in mere days, forcing the Hunts to sell nearly everything they owned to meet margin calls.  In retrospect, they seem not to have broken any rules. However, the Comex was forced to crush them in order to stabilize the metals market. What Does It Mean? Silver's current rise has been orderly, more or less, but with a pitch so steep that it caught many players with their pants down.  No reason to feel sorry for them, since they are ethically and morally on a level with child molesters, broad-tossers and cannibals.  But the radical shift in precious-metal prices relative to all other classes of investable assets raises a question that should concern us all.  For it is not happening in a vacuum, and we can only guess at what it will mean years down the road. Will silver resume a monetary role? Is Trump licking his chops over the prospect of borrowing against all of the gold

Readers can be forgiven for wondering how long the 'topping process' I've alluded to over the last several months will drag on. As you will have long since concluded, no one can answer that question with confidence. For all that we supposed experts know, the bull market begun in 2009 could still be chugging blithely along two years from now when Trump's successor takes office.  But this will be the last you'll hear from me about a topping process, even if the bear market for which it will set the hook is as likely as tomorrow's sunrise. It will be a doozy, catalyzed by the unwinding of an Everything Bubble that already owns us, up to and including M&A superstars and big-time real estate developers. The implosion will inflict hard times on most Americans, especially Baby Boomers who went all-in with Nvidia shares, private equity schemes and rental properties mortgaged to the eaves. How worried should you be?  I'd suggest taking doomsday predictions with a grain of salt. Speaking as a die-hard permabear who has been predicting a Second Great Depression for as long as anyone can remember, I'd be the first to concede there is no reason why the Dow Industrials and the S&Ps could not co  ascend, possibly doubling or even tripling over the next 5–10 years.  Just realize that any reported gains in the standard of living would be largely illusory, even as quality-of-life amenities that we took for granted in the 1950s continued toward extinction. Things like doctors making house calls, and mothers being able to stay home with their children. That was America's Renaissance, even if no one knew it at the time. Science to the Rescue! Technology will come through for us as it always has, right?  AI wizardry, huge productivity gains and millions

The Dow is poised to hit 50,000 this week, a milestone that would have seemed surreal when the blue chip average, plagued by covid, was bottoming near 18,000 six years ago. Although there can be little doubt that Trump helped kick stocks into high gear, one could argue that a powerfully bullish economic cycle made the man rather than the other way around.  Stated another way, the stock market's spectacular rally reflects a cyclical mood-change across America that made Trump's election not merely possible, but inevitable. Would shares be at these heights with Kamala Harris in the White House?  It seems implausible, since she could never have matched Trump's ambitious agenda. This is not to suggest that all or even most of his initiatives will succeed. In fact, some of the most important ones could lay an egg. Tariffs, for instance. They amount to little more than a new tax on global trade, with consequences that have yet to produce a clear result, let alone a positive one.  His promise to make life more affordable for most Americans could also be a non-starter for reasons explained here a couple of weeks ago. And his plan to revitalize Venezuela's oil production has already been labeled 'uninvestible' by the CEO of ExxonMobil. As for the reshoring of manufacturing. no one is talking about how revived and new factories would have to be practically worker-less to compete with heavily robotized plants in South Korea, China, Japan and elsewhere. What Jobs? And what about Trump's plan to radically reorganize the mortgage market so that young people can buy houses?  Although this sounds appealing, what will be the source of their income? The job market is changing so rapidly, especially with AI increasingly replacing more white-collar workers, that even seasoned recruiters can no longer predict

The speculative frenzy in silver has provided welcome relief from AI claptrap, but will it last?  There are a hundred theories about why silver has come exuberantly to life after lagging gold for so long.   I've been puzzled myself, since my technical runes suggest that gold futures could make an important top at $5132, about $800 above Friday's settlement price.  Silver would likely peak at the same time, unless the squeeze on physical supply were to pick up enough climactic energy to cause an historical readjustment in the gold:silver ratio. The Founders thought 15:1 was the correct peg, implying silver could be trading for $342 with gold at $5132. That sounds farfetched, but stranger things have happened in the financial world, especially in markets caught in short squeezes. What is most peculiar about the current run on silver is that it probably couldn't have occurred without Trump's blessings.  He has said he wants a much higher gold price in order to monetize America's few remaining, unhocked assets (including residential real estate). Letting silver off the leash would make almost everyone feel at least a little richer.  The problem is, some of Trump's most powerful buddies in the banking business are short silver up the wazoo.  Citi and B of A alone reportedly have loaned out at interest $4.5 billion of silver they do not possess, exposing themelves to potentially catastrophic losses if AG quotes should soar anew. Trump's Fortunes And what if gold goes no higher than $5132?  A corresponding top in silver followed by a steep slide in both could cap Trump's fortunes. It would certainly destroy the comforting illusion that financial markets are under control.  Of course, crazy ideas like that can only persist in bull markets.  If stock averages were to sell off by 30%-40%, which they

My best wishes to you all for the holiday season and the New Year. May you and yours enjoy good health, prosperity and serene contentment in 2026.  My regular weekly commentaries will resume with the edition scheduled for publication on Sunday, January 4.  In the meantime, trading 'touts' (see below) will update as usual late Sunday afternoon.

The widespread notion that a U.S. president can significantly influence the economy is mistaken. In observable fact, the broad cycles that bring us good times and bad, booms and busts, are vastly larger and more powerful than the presidency, too overwhelming to even affect, let alone command. Even the radical policies of Roosevelt's New Deal were insufficient to end a depression that had taken more than a generation to gather force. America's eventual emergence from those very hard times happened gradually during the administrations of Truman, Eisenhower and Kennedy. Moreover, the post-war rebuilding process that made Europe and Japan America's best customers arguably would have happened cyclically without a Marshall Plan, and the U.S. financial system would have receded naturally from the fiscal excesses of a war that itself was an uncontrollable cyclical event. In this view, Kennedy, Clinton, Obama and Biden were simply lucky to have been elected with the economy and the stock market at cyclical lows. For in no way did they cause the upswings that shone on their terms in office, nor the felicitous shifts in the mood of consumers. The bullish cycle had to have been particularly strong to survive the misbegotten policies of Obama, the first president to revile  American exceptionalism, if not America itself. Surfing the Big Wave  Which brings us to Trump, the president who has come closest to affecting the economy both inside and outside the U.S.  Trump inherited a fiscal blowout impelled by the covid hoax, but he has since turned it into a credit and fiscal bonfire that can only end in ashes.  Trump has merely extended an especially powerful upswing that he did nothing to cause. It should have ended with the senile Biden and his autopen administration, but Trump's aggressive economic activism kicked already booming asset values

Just one more push could exhaust a bull market that is coming up on its seventeenth year. Although that's only about three dog years, it equates to about 120 human years.  In fact, no other bull market has lasted even remotely that long. The next-oldest, birthed at the low of the October 1987 Crash, was 13 years old before a crash in tech-sector stocks ended the dream for millions of investors grown stupid on greed. Could it happen again?  Only a fool would ask that question. My recent commentaries have warned with increasing shrillness that stocks are in a topping process. I have purposely left the details vague, since bull-market tops are notoriously full of deceptions.  However, the chart above provides a compelling number for the party to end, a 7492 Hidden Pivot target for the E-Mini S&P futures that lies 8.6% above. Last week featured the second straight Friday on which bulls and bears did little more than screw the pooch. Usually, Fridays are fun, or at least interesting, for one group or the other. But lately it's been like watching a heavyweight slugfest that turned bloody in the seventh round. Bears have lacked the guts to deliver the haymaker, but the buy-the-dips junkies, who have been winning on points since 2009, seem too fatigued and lacking in conviction to counterpunch. Thus did stocks fall to end the week, although not enough to worry anyone, much less spook the herd. Paralyzed by Doubt All the excitement was in gold and silver, which have been rising since early 2024 in a steepening trajectory. The uptrend is practically vertical now and in need of a rest. But that is not how bull markets work, as many bulls are discovering. Although they've been praying for a big move for years, now that