Free

Skittish about the stock market's manic climb?  Consider moving some of your savings into T-bills, which are currently yielding around 4.25%. You could do worse. Some of my friends are reluctant to take e ven a little money off the table because 2024 was such an incredible year for them.  One is a retired lawyer who racked up a nearly $500,000 gain in Nvidia.  She sold enough shares to buy a condo in Palm Beach, but her portfolio is otherwise unchanged and showing a return of about 40% for the year. She and her financial advisor are confident her portfolio will do equally well next year. Both of my siblings had a similar experience, but they have since moved most of their nest eggs into Treasury bonds and bills.  It has been an extraordinary year for them, and for millions of Baby Boomers who owned stocks, real estate or both. Who could blame them for thinking that the bull market begun in 2009 might have another year or two left in it? On the other hand, valuations are at their highest levels ever, and a real estate downturn seems all but certain because mortgage rates are stuck at levels too high to attract first-time buyers. And few would deny the stock market is out of its mind, a beast on steroids; we all sense this in our bones. Consider the way speculators have shrugged off ominous tariff news. Trump has threatened our two biggest trading partners, Mexico and Canada, with protectionist levies that would punish U.S. auto manufacturers in particular and cause grocery prices to surge anew. The President-elect also seems hell-bent on implementing immigration restrictions that would tighten the supply of workers, particularly for unskilled jobs. He's Bluffing, Right? Toward the end of the Roaring Twenties, when Congress was

Let's hope Musk and Ramaswamy have been paying close attention to David Stockman's ten-part series on how to cut the U.S. budget before America spends its way into bankruptcy. Stockman was Reagan's budget director in 1981-85 and eminently qualified to spell out the tough reforms needed to force the U.S. to live within its means. He is no fan of Trump, to put it mildly, but he sees the Musk/Ramaswamy 'DOGE' project as America's last chance to get spending under control. Musk famously asserted during the campaign that he could cut $2 trillion annually from a total federal budget of around $6 trillion. Although we've come to expect big things and even the impossible from Musk, in this case, even with the intrepid Ramaswamy aboard, DOGE may have bitten off more than it can chew. Ironically, it is Stockman's long, detailed list of cuts that makes Musk's goal seem farfetched if not impossible. Stockton admits that eliminating nearly every U.S. department and agency you can think of, and laying off more than half-a-million government employees at the outset, would scarcely dent deficit spending that's been pushing the national debt toward $40 trillion at a rate of more than $3 trillion per year. The list of 16 agencies Trump should axe as soon as he takes office in January includes the FBI, DEA, BATF, NHTSA, Legal Services Corp. and the Department of Education.  Additionally, says Stockman, DOGE should shoot for 50% staff reductions in these fat cows: the SEC (2,250 workers, for savings of $360 million); FCC (750 workers, for savings of $120 million: FAA (22,500 workers, for savings of $3.6 billion); IRS (41,500 workers, for savings of $6.64 billion); National Labor Relations Board (800 workers, for savings of $130 million); Office of Personnel Management (1,250 staff, for savings of $314

The selloff from the 108.07 high recorded on November 22 has exceeded any minimum downside target I could have projected at the outset.  Also, the high fell a whopping 91 cents shy of my 108.98 upside objective, and that is another reason I've given this correction wide berth with the big pattern shown and its 'locked' point 'a' high. The chart implies the downtrend is bound for a minimum 104.91, the pattern's midpoint Hidden Pivot support. Expect a tradable reversal from there, but if it is short-lived, or if the support is decisively penetrated on first contact, it could signal an important tone change in the bull cycle begun in early October. Since gold has been moving higher with the dollar, we might expect bullion's uptrend to accelerate if the greenback continues to fall.

The December contract cheated us out of a profitable 'mechanical' buy at the green line when it erupted for a 60-point rally without having quite touched our 'launching pad' at x=2598.80. Price action is bullish but not quite bullish enough to make the bounce a shoo-in to achieve the pattern's 2770.70 target.  We'll therefore begin the week without the usual confidence and clarity, so check for updates if there's any movement, since that cannot but shed light on the strength and resilience of the uptrend. My gut feeling is that it will achieve d=2770.70, but without making it look easy. _______ UPDATE (Dec 3, 3:58 p.m.): More sideways tedium this week has added nothing useful to an indecisive picture. I am proffering this chart nonetheless as a companion to the update moments ago of the Silver tout immediately below. Both need an upsurge through their respective midpoint Hidden Pivot resistances to signal the onset of a meaningful rally.

With its 'locked' point 'a' low, the pattern shown looks reliable for our purposes, whether trading or forecasting. It is not a healthy sign that the rally off the 44.76 low recorded on November 14 failed on the first attempt to reach the red line, a midpoint Hidden Pivot at 49.17. Bulls could still pull it off, but if GDXJ dips below C=44.76, negating the pattern, that would be more than a mild discouragement. The weakness so far is especially dispiriting because of the power of the impulse leg that took GDXJ quickly from 46.71 to 55.58, a 20% move, in mid-October. _______ UPDATE (Dec 9, 9:17 a.m. EST): This morning's gap through p=49.17 has guaranteed that the rally will reach D=53.58, at least. Be prepared for a stall there.

The chart shown (inset) substitutes a single target for two at, respectively, 107,670 and 119,253 that were given here last week. They will remain viable in theory, but it will be simpler to use a single target that would become a lock-up if and when the Hidden Pivot midpoint resistance is decisively exceeded. I have blanked out the Hidden Pivot levels for p, p2 and D because they looked too useful to share with outsiders. To reproduce the chart with the coordinates and precise levels, combine the visual information in the thumbnail chart with data I posted in the chat room at 2:00 a.m. Sunday morning. _______ UPDATE (Dec 6): If you're updating the chart, add in a low at 92,091 on Thursday that provided a textbook opportunity to get long 'mechanically' at the green line (x=93,344) for a so-far $8500 ride. Meanwhile, the target (1xx,343.54)  I posted last Saturday at 2:20 a.m. remains not just valid, but downright enticing.

The big pattern shown in the inset is too ambitious to frame the so-far timid gyrations that have lifted T-Bonds from their bear-market low. However, I have used it anyway because lesser charts magnify TLT's indecisiveness even more. Regardless, the gyrations have triggered a theoretical 'buy' signal that will require a follow-through to at least p=116.27 for validation, TLT is tradable in the meantime, but only by way of short-term signals on the intraday charts. A breach of c=82.42 would be discouraging news for the few bond bulls who have bucked the tide, although not necessarily for those who have been waiting for a washout to load up the truck.

DXY's sharp poke on Friday through p=107.55, the midpoint Hidden Pivot, implies the rally is very likely to reach the pattern's 108.98 target.  This symbol is not optionable, but you can trade the futures contract by interpolating my targets.  It is encouraging to see bullion strengthen with the dollar rampaging higher.  Its potential on DXY's long-term chart is to 119.37, or 124.82 if any higher (monthly chart, A= 89.54 on 5/31/21). A move of that magnitude would put enormous strain on all who owe dollars, and a ruinous deflation would likely be the result. This would occur irrespective of the level of nominal interest rates, since it is the real (i.e., inflation-adjusted) burden of debt that matters, not the marquee number.

I've always treated MSFT as an infallible bellwether. My narrow, if not to say obsessive, focus has served us well, since MSFT has stayed consistently a step ahead of the broad averages, and even ahead of other stocks in the lunatic sector (i.e., the atrociously misnamed Magnificent Seven). But the long bull market has not conditioned us to think that when MSFT acts like crap for an entire year, as it has, that it is signaling a possible end to the bull market. This I will infer, however, implying that the failure to produce an easy 'mechanical' winner after falling to the green line on November 18 is further evidence of a waning bull.  This observation would be strengthened by a dip below C=405.57 without having first achieved D=435.90. The target and pattern will remain viable as long as 405.57 is not breached.