Right on cue, Bloomberg.com splashed an article on its front page over the weekend explaining why the price of crude has been so subdued in the face of potentially severe supply disruptions in the Middle East. Turns out the world is awash in oil, the article explained — not just because of the success of U.S. fracking, but also because the Saudis have been pumping oil like crazy to stabilize their market share. The article was almost surely planted by Bloomberg’s masters in Washington to calm the herd. Energy markets are very heavily manipulated, and PR is frequently used to nudge quotes one way or the other, ostensibly “in the national interest.” Capping prices would appear to be a high priority at the moment, superseding the $100-a-barrel needs of traders and speculators who thrive on volatility. But who is kidding whom? Just beneath the veneer of eerie, artificial calm lurks enough pent-up panic to push quotes from a current $72 to $100 literally overnight. That’s why I’m sticking with a forecast from a week ago that August Crude will hit a minimum $86. In the meantime, don’t be lulled by the way bulls were rebuked this morning with a so-far $8 reversal from 78. Too many things could go wrong for oil prices to be this docile, and for stocks to be hovering so close to record highs. Only fools are buyers of shares at these levels. _______ ADDENDUM (1:25 p.m. EDT): Sunday evening's fleeting spike, noted above, came within three cents (0.03) of the 78.37 rally target I had flagged in the earlier tout as a good bet. If you took that bet and then got short at the target with a stop-loss as tight as a nickel, you could have caught an up-and-down ride worth as much as
A subscriber posted the bullish pattern shown (see inset) in the chat room on Friday, and although I wasn't enthused about it at the time, I now like it more than the alternative I went on to suggest. It shows two possibilities of a bear market developing without a new record high in the S&Ps. The first implies the futures will fall from current levels, even though they've triggered a theoretical buy signal at the green line (x=6030.94). The second allows for a rally to the 6250.38 midpoint Hidden Pivot resistance, just shy of last winter's multiple peaks near 6280. I've been operating under the assumption that the huge move off April's low was a bear rally, a sucker's bet destined to sputter out beneath the old high. I still consider this likely, although less so if the September contract should achieve p=6250.38. It won't make much difference in the way we trade this vehicle, and a tightly stopped short at p will be warranted in any event. A third possibility -- a move to new record highs -- would only increase my skepticism and make me more bearish.
I've been quietly promoting a 486.17 target as a place to get short, and although I am still recommending that you attempt it with a very tight stop-loss, I am no longer as enthused. It was based on a variant of my favorite pattern, a 'quickie' ABC followed by a long, dragged-out C-D leg. In this case, I ignored a visually compelling ABC whose 477 target had already been exceeded to favor a bastardized pattern with a still unfulfilled target. The change has forced me to the big, bullish pattern shown, with a target at 503.69. The pattern looks much too obvious to work precisely, but the gap through p=424.24 still all but guarantees that D will be reached, at least. If it doesn't stop the rally precisely, it will surely impose a formidable obstacle, and possibly a fatal one. This is important to consider, since a major top in MSFT would mark the start of a bear market for stocks in general. _______ UPDATE (Jun 23, 3:14 p.m. EDT): The stock has made a so-far high today at 487.75, somewhat above my target. See the chat room discussion for explicit instruction on getting short. ______ UPDATE (Jun 24, 9:40 a.m. EDT): The short triggered around 7:10 a.m. this morning when the stock dropped from an off-hours high at 492.00 to 489.26. A drop of an additional 2.74 (equal to the suggested trigger interval) dictated profit-tsking at 486.53. The trade is still 'live', with a break-even-or-better stop-loss on the remaining 50% of the position. The downside target is 481.06, where most (although not all) of the position that is left is to be covered. _______ UPDATE (Jun 25, 1:19 p.m. EDT): Check my post in the chat room just now for a tradable update.
Although crude oil is certainly tradable using Hidden Pivots, it rarely traces out patterns that I like. This one is an exception, however, and it promises to do everything we might ask of it. That means: 1) providing a good 'buy' signal at x=73.83, which it has already done; 2) offering a tightly stopped short at p=75.34; 3) making a move to D=78.37 a high confidence call if p is penetrated decisively; and 4) yielding a high-odds 'mechanical' buy at the green line if a pullback to it should occur from in-between p=75.34 and p2=76.86. Are you ready for this cornucopia of opportunity? _______ UPDATE (Jun 23, 7:25 a.m. EDT): The futures gapped explosively to within three cents (0.03) of the 78.37 target I flagged above as a good bet. If you took that bet and then got short at the target with a stop-loss as tight as a nickel, you could have caught and up and down ride worth as much as $4,000 per contract.
We've been in a tug-of-war with this rabid weasel, hoping against hope that it will get just a teensy comeuppance -- a fake one, admittedly -- with a feint below the grandiose 100,000 level. Saylor et al. must be quite pleased that there are no serious sellers in this vehicle, let alone short sellers. Holding it aloft is as easy as keeping a beach ball afloat in a swimming pool. My downside target remains 97,616 nonetheless, but in the meantime, I see a possible bottom-fishing opportunity at 102,053, a proprietary 'voodoo' support. This is a slight revision of a 101,174 correction target given earlier. Risk no more on the stop-loss than you would on a 20-to-1 filly that had a promising morning workout. ______ UPDATE (Jun 24, 9:52 a.m. EDT): Looks like Sunday's print at 99,039 will be as low as this charmless little hoax will go. I haven't given up on the 97,616 target, but we should put it aside now for the sake of practicality. The next stop on the way up will be at 109,243 (corrected upward on 6/24 at 3:08 p.m. EDT), my minimum objective at the moment.
This symbol has tracked my forecast for the last couple of weeks, but what now? Up or down in the week ahead looks like a coin-toss at the moment, but if rates break lower, expect them to fall to at least 4.278% (p2, the secondary Hidden Pivot), and to take a tradable bounce from that number. Best case (for borrowers, that is) would be for further slippage to d=4.161%, which presumably would be signaled by a decisive breach of p2=4.278%. Alternatively, if rates move higher, signaled by a two-day close above 4.439%, look for a move to 4.559%.
I've masked the proprietary origins of the 3326.40 target shown, but suffice it to say it is the 'd' Hidden Pivot target of a big 'reverse' pattern. However you slice it, it looks like a promising spot to try bottom-fishing with a stop-loss as tight as 1.50-2.00 points. It can also be used as a minimum downside objective, since the 'd' target of a smaller reverse pattern was exceeded on Friday. The overshoot was just a point or two, but that is enough for us to infer that more weakness is coming. We used a similarly derived target last week to get aboard a $33 upthrust within $2 of the low. Gold has been equally nasty toward bulls and bears alike over the last two weeks, but if it breaks the 3326.40 support easily, it is bulls who are likely to get flayed -- all the way down to as low as 3251.40, or even 3176.40. I'm not saying much about the bullish case because gold has been such a little sonofabitch lately, but if it surprises by heading higher Sunday evening, look for a run-up to at least 3437.80, the midpoint Hidden Pivot resistance of a conventional pattern on the hourly chart (A= 3313.10 on 6/8). A close above that number would indicate still more upside to at least 3519.40. My longer-term projection is quite bullish and calls for a rally to 3695.30. _______ UPDATE Jun 24, 10:12 a.m. EDT): The futures have breached a would-be concrete midpoint support at 3326.40, and that means they are likely to fall to at least 3251.40; or, if that Hidden Pivot support fails, to a worst-case 3176.40. Either number can be bottom-fished aggressively, provided you have the chops to limit entry risk to no more than $250 per contract. Here's the chart.
July Silver aborted a textbook 'mechanical' buy at 36.349 last week, a sign that there is something wrong below the surface despite the 12% rally in June from 33 to 37. Perhaps bulls just need a breather? SI is notorious for reversing after stopping out previous highs and lows. This is what it did on Friday, bouncing 50 cents after dipping a couple of ticks beneath the 35.580 low recorded on June 12. However, I doubt the reversal will get legs, since the move following the breach of a too-obvious support. We'll give it the benefit of the doubt nonetheless while stipulating that the uptrend must surpass three small peaks, the highest of them at 37.045, to regain our respect.
The rally has sputtered out in a bad place, more than a little shy of the 74.87 target I'd flagged. I still expect that Hidden Pivot to be achieved, but we will need to be careful about where we re-board or augment long-term positions. For now, I'll suggest bidding 66.14 with a stop-loss at 63.23. This is a textbook 'mechanical' buy, but it is somewhat riskier than attempting it at the green line (where a 57.40 stop-loss would apply). If it comes down to that, we should initiate with a 'camouflage' trigger. This means using a pattern of small degree to signal a 'buy' at its point x, 25% along the C-D leg.
The 96.36 downside target we've been using remains viable. The current, countertrend move would need to surpass the 'external' peak at 100.54 recorded on May 29 to imply the long-term downtrend may be about to change. Even then, that would generate a 'mechanical' sell signal that we would likely ignore. More immediately, anything above 99.39 early in the week would be a faintly bullish sign.