Does ‘Braveheart’ Ending Await Bears?

Although the Dow Industrials finished the week with a 186-point rally, there’s reason to hope that this latest, drug-addled binge will sputter out within the next two or three days if not sooner. The sleazeballs who engineered Friday’s impressive levitation had to pull out quite a few stops to make it happen. To get things rolling, they precipitously withdrew their bids Thursday night on news that Asian markets were getting socked, apparently because of bad vibes from Ukraine. The air pocket in U.S Index futures produced a quick 15-point drop in the E-Mini S&Ps – equivalent to about 120 Dow points.

Now, it is not unusual for the night crew to push prices around a little when ostensibly tradable news comes their way. Such gratuitous oscillations usually occur within a relatively narrow range, and it is these nervous squiggles that make the long stretches of tedium in the wee hours tolerable for nocturnal predators. The added enticement is that there’s not much risk in this, provided one is not sitting on the can, or moaning over Russian porn, when all geopolitical or financial hell breaks loose as it sometimes does. In this case, however, because the Asian selloff was not serious enough to trigger a panic in Europe, let alone an avalanche in U.S. stocks, the downdraft amounted to a brazen heist. For perps accustomed to shoplifting, it was akin to their ordering the store manager to open the safe.

The Music of Lucre

The arpeggio of buying that followed was deftly played and lucrative, at least for its producers. By 4 a.m. Eastern, sellers were more or less spent when shares fell to a fire-sale level at which even widows and pensioners knew they’d been had.  It took but another hour to run up stocks sufficiently to ensure that shorts, too, would greet the opening with fear and self-loathing in their hearts. By that time, seven hours off their lows, stocks were sitting above the previous day’s close. Feeling confidently in control, DaBoyz feathered back just a bit at the opening, creating a shallow pullback that allowed them to buy a few more shares without letting bears off the hook. The fact that the ass-bandits were then able to goose stocks into a full-blown  second leg of short-covering, and to close the broad averages above Thursday’s peak, attests to their great skill in manipulating fear to their consistent advantage. However, my gut feeling is that the second wind-rally into the close may have exhausted short-covering for the time being, much as the 4 a.m. low had exhausted selling.

How Traps Are Set

From a technical standpoint, it’s possible that the E-Mini S&P futures will now slash and burn a path all the way up to 1949.25. That would be equivalent to a Dow rally of a little more than 200 points, or a 0.618 retracement of the plunge from July 24’s record high. Any higher will place shorts in the kind of jeopardy that Mel Gibson’s William Wallace character faced at the conclusion of Braveheart – i.e., impaled and racked to the thinness of a pipe cleaner, but still capable of responding to pain.

For our part, we’ll be looking to get short with a tight stop-loss near the 0.618 line mentioned above, but also at new record highs if they should follow. Bulls and bears would be in the same boat at that point, their buying power spent and nowhere to go but down. What a trap that would be! Not a bear in sight, nor a single bull lacking in confidence and conviction.

  • Jeff Weinstein August 17, 2014, 10:40 pm

    I love your writing style. It’s one of the reasons I keep a subscription even when I’m not trading.

  • Redwilldanaher August 17, 2014, 8:16 pm

    Gary’s idiocy knows no bounds. He perpetually points to hyper manipulated and outright faked “facts” as proof that things are great. I could break the law and hyper-in debt myself too and fool a lot of people into believing that things are “great” for me too. There’s very little difference between that description and what’s been happening over the last few decades and especially the past 5 years. Somehow though after countless people have tried to get that across to the Garo, it still manages to elude him. Most people focus on cause and effect but Garo seems only capable of pointing to effect. It’s all quite absurd actually.

  • Jackson August 17, 2014, 4:39 am

    Gary, you are way behind the eight ball on the whole last 4 years. You see, human ego will never admit wrongfulness.

    I vividly remember Jim Sinclair PROMISING that if Gold didn’t hit $1650 by January 15 2000 whatever that he would shut down his website. Well, it didn’t. And his website is still up. You get what I’m saying?

    You’ll have to start fresh from here. Put Rick on the ropes with a bet on how you think things will pan out in the next 5 years. Then you’ll have some leverage.

  • gary leibowitz August 16, 2014, 6:14 pm

    Rick, you want an answer to the topic. Well lets try not to characterize ever single move up for the past 6 years as an attempt by the “sleaze balls”. Lets not have every single post by you salivating for the moment that the “Big One” is here. Please look back at all your old posts with the same fervor that its all about to end. You make claims and when they don’t pan out you shout manipulation. Your arbitrary Fibonacci declarations are just that, arbitrary starting points. Why the obsession?

    Point of facts. We have had crashes before so your argument that “DaBoys” can control the market is hogwash. You insist the market is being fooled and is about to wake up any moment, yet in hindsight you are the one that has been fooled. Real verifiable earnings. Real verifiable profits. Are you still stating that the last 6 years was false? Clearly you have to adjust your model to accommodate the facts. It shouldn’t be the other way around.

    I do agree with some of your technical analysis, but when you try to tweak it to fit a crash scenario it all falls apart. I agree that we are due for a 20 percent correction soon. I agree that the top could very well be at SPX of 2020. I have a slightly wider range in that regard. 2020 – 2070.

    As for the current market reaction, I would say that the gyrations are externally motivated, while domestically we are doing as well as we have since the crash occurred. You accept the deep drop in last quarters GDP, yet call foul the current 3 percent move up. You insist that the debt load is too great now to allow for further expansion yet we are seeing more spending and borrowing. You deny the accuracy of jobs, earnings reports, factory orders, service sector expansion, and optimism from CEO’s. You dismiss the world view until the world adjusts to yours.

    There is an obvious debt problem that went on steroids when the mortgage implosion occurred. The analysis on your part is flawed. There has to be other reasons why we are still holding up. Mario mentioned Asian growth, I mentioned low rates that relieves the largest debt burden, mortgages. The reason we are only muddling along has actually been a good one, consumer reluctance to borrow more. In 2009 consumer debt to GDP was at 97 percent. it is now at 80. The largest debt burden, mortgages, has been coming down, even as the others, such as student loans and autos, has been rising. The fact that consumers and borrowers contracted created a scenario where corporations would profit from it. No pressure on costs and wages is the reason we tripled from the lows. Perversely however is the fact that as we feel more confident the old habits will re-surface, as they are right now. That will eventually cause the next debt implosion. I just don’t see that happening in this cycle. It takes time for pressures to reflate.

    I wish I could encapsulate my thoughts in three paragraphs.

    &&&&&&

    Today (August 18), I am using a longstanding, bullish Hidden Pivot rally target at 168.03 in DIA to get short (via Aug 29 167 puts). I expect subscribers to make money on this bearish trade regardless of whether the Dow goes higher. This target anticipated a rally of several hundred points, but I still have an outstanding rally target at 17622 for the Dow that was disseminated long ago, when you were making the same, arrogantly ignorant claims you’ve repeated above about what it is that I think, and how I trade.

    Concerning the sleazeballs, I’ve been around the block a few times, Gary, including as a market maker on an exchange floor for a dozen years, so don’t presume to tell me what makes stocks move. It’s all one big sleazy, game, Gary, and it is rigged like a carnival midway so that the rubes almost never win. RA

  • Joseph August 16, 2014, 10:20 am

    Great ES call Friday AM Rick Kudos

  • Jackson August 16, 2014, 5:24 am

    Gary, as I’m one who is directly employed in agriculture I take offense to your insinuation that [pesticides, fish farming, slaughter houses, polluting land and sea] is a moral hazard. Sheeple know nothing about it except what they read on the internet from tin foil hat chicken littles.

  • John Jay August 15, 2014, 8:22 pm

    Rick,
    Thanks for the info on the AC situation, that was too funny, tears running down my face right now.
    That was an Oliver Wendell Douglas level rant for sure!

  • redwilldanaher August 13, 2014, 1:35 am

    Worked like a charm. Firing on all cylinders…

    Drudge:

    Fed Official Warns ‘Disappointing’ Growth Could Foretell Future…

    Sluggish jobs market points to structural problems…

    Yellen Determined To Avoid ‘Nightmare Scenario’…

    Record income gap fuels housing weakness…

    Wages Down 23% Since 2008…

    Bank Profits Near Record Levels…

    • gary leibowitz August 14, 2014, 3:41 am

      Red, I think you should give it a rest. Your excuses for why the market and PROFITS have done so well is pathetic. 85 percent of the move was from the futures pits? Wages and disappoint growth?

      If you can make these ludicrous statements reinforcing your world view for the last 6 years thru “fake” intervention , I can state aliens have “body snatched” 85 percent of all human existence these last 6 years. I have as much believability as you. The funny part is that everyone here believes your story. It only took me a few years for anyone to concede that earnings might be real. But wait, that story has been changed recently with the use of buybacks. Why that’s outrageous! Companies buying back their own shares? it must be a conspiracy after all. Why they never before did such a thing.

      &&&&&&

      Speaking as a trader with 40 years’ experience, I’d say the point of Red’s post is self-evident — but not to you, of course. Look at a chart. Stocks spend 95% of their time doing nothing. The remaining 5% of the time, when big moves occur, the moves are either short-squeeze rallies, or shakedowns engineeered by DaScumballs intent on buying stocks (particularly in bull markets) at fire-sale prices. Another thing you probably wouldn’t care to know is that MORE THAN HALF OF ALL BUYING these days is coming from companies buying their own shares — quite often with Fed funny money that has cost them almost nothing to borrow. Some bull market!

      And as long as I’m putting some of the ridiculously stupid things you say in here back in your face, let me address a point you made regarding my statement that U.S. corporate tax rates are the highest in the world. You cited some twaddle about how the actual taxes paid are relatively low. If this were even remotely true or accurate, foreign companies would be tripping over themselves to operate here, and U.S. companies would not be fleeing to actual low-tax countries such as Ireland. Another fact of which you are either ignorant, or which you have chosen to ignore, is that many U.S. companies have billions in revenues sitting offshore, since they would be double-taxed on it if they repatriated the money to the U.S. America is the only country in the world that requires its multinationals to pay U.S. taxes in addition to the taxes the companies are already paying to the countries where they operate.

      Wouldn’t it be something if you got just one simple fact straight! Instead, everything you write is ideologically polluted nonsense. RA

      • redwilldanaher August 14, 2014, 10:23 pm

        “Wouldn’t it be something if you got just one simple fact straight! Instead, everything you write is ideologically polluted nonsense.”

        Great line!

        I would like to see the guy be intellectually honest just once and to answer people’s charges directly instead of his usual clintoonesque equivocation.

      • redwilldanaher August 14, 2014, 10:34 pm

        BTW, it’s 5 years and $4 Tril later and really much more and yet they’re still worried about the training wheels coming off.

        The plan that you’ve embraced has killed it for the fat cats and crushed mom and pop.

        And you’re still cheering?

      • redwilldanaher August 15, 2014, 4:09 am

        Rick, Michael Snyder’s concluding paragraphs today via ZH:

        There is no way that this bubble of false prosperity was going to last forever. It was never real to begin with. It was just based on a pyramid of debt and false promises. In fact, the condition of the global financial system is now far worse than it was just prior to the financial crisis of 2008.

        Sadly, most people do not understand these things. Most people just assume that our leaders have fixed whatever caused the problems last time. And when the next crisis arrives, they will be totally blindsided by it.

      • gary leibowitz August 15, 2014, 5:23 am

        Please! Lets get back to basics. People invest to make money. If they see earnings going up they invest till it no longer does so, or they see a special reason to do so, like a buyout. They don’t concern themselves about company ethics, slave labor, outsourcing, job cuts. They certainly don’t get all emotional about the suffering these mega companies are causing. If we don’t separate between moral indignation and making money from them we would never invest in 90 percent of all companies. Pesticides, fish farming, slaughter houses, polluting land air and sea.

        So now you think that we are now bound by another standard? Governments bend rules to keep the economy going. Create unfair treatment. Even created this mess to start with. And have placed this country in more hock.

        You seem to equate unfair manipulation of rules that will favor the already well off, with manipulation of earnings. As a trader if companies beat expectations and expect ever greater profits in the current environment would you ignore that? Complain about HOW they receive their earnings. Complain that it is unsustainable. Please don’t tell me the last 5 years of all these companies earnings were by smoke and mirrors.

        As a trader you of all people should know that when situations change you reevaluate its profit potential. I explained years ago, right here, that company profits would mushroom in this environment. Are you really telling me that a low cost, cheap labor force is bad for profit? It only becomes bad when earnings are impacted. When people can’t afford to buy their stuff. Lets not whine that it’s all on credit. That too is transparent. We get the data, yet you ignore it because it offends you. Why you can’t separate the two is beyond me. The bow will break when it does. I see no sign yet that it is about to.

        How much money is invested in the market? Can the combined effort of governments prevent people from exiting the market when profits are better somewhere else? really think so? For 6 years now? Didn’t Soros test that theory on government manipulation? Tell me where they should have invested? Money will chase the best yields with the relative safety of returns.

        Never mind! You have given so many reasons over the years why the market holds up except the simple notion that companies are making money. You mentioned years ago about autos, no ending QE, deflation spiral, no growth, no real jobs, all profits on cost cutting. I mention that the problem and shift in our economic structure happened in the early 80’s. That hasn’t stopped the advance. It takes a long time for attitudes to change and fear to take permanent hold. we are not there. Without some external shock or fear creeping in this will take more time. I truly expect to see corporations make their highest profits in history by 2016. You can’t force the time table to fit your outrage. me, I’ll stick to the notion we have a wave 4 followed by 5 before we end this meg run.

        BTW, the latest CEO conference showed an extreme optimism over profits peaking around 2016. Do you think they can’t anticipate the trend? They certainly can be wrong, but that doesn’t negate the front line person expressing optimism. This debate will go on till we actually have a crash. I expect to disappoint you by being on the same wagon by then.

        &&&&&&

        That’s 580 more words of the same old blather, Gary, and in all of it you have not addressed even one of the three points that I made. RA

  • John Jay August 12, 2014, 4:04 pm

    Rick,

    Revel Casino in Atlantic City is closing.
    I remember when all the Casinos in AC first opened and what a big deal it was to drive down there from CT with my buddies and experience Vegas East!
    But then States permitting casinos got to be a crowded trade and it is ending where it began.
    Only so many senior citizens to fleece out of their Social Security money!

    Poor Atlantic City!
    Maybe they can rent it out for an “Elysium” sequel!
    That was a great movie, and you won’t need to wait until 2154 to see Los Angeles looking like that.
    Well on it’s way there as I am typing this comment!

    &&&&&&&

    I remember Resorts’ opening vividly. The casino was packed so tightly that you literally couldn’t get in the door. The casino enabling legislation was written by the nephew of Resorts’ lawyer, and he gave Resorts a nice one-year head-start before the next operator, Caesar’s, could open. Caesar’s was desperate to get into AC, but the only place in town that they could quickly convert to a hotel/casino was an upscale Howard Johnson’s. The guys who owned it took 30% vig off the top for the first five years, in addition to a whole bunch of great perks.

    Concerning The Revel, I don’t recall a precedent for shutting down a $2.4B structure indefinitely. It could be another 200 years before someone finds a sufficiently profitable use for the property to tear down the hotel/casino structure (for it cannot conceivably function as anything else). With luck (for AC), Borgata will be the last man standing, effectively bringing the city to the one-casino, Monaco model that the visionary planner Angelos Demetriou had originally envisioned (and for which the city paid $500,000). RA

    • John Jay August 12, 2014, 6:24 pm

      Rick,
      Ah, smoky room deals to get AC off the ground back in the day!
      How many Wiseguys made a fortune out of the rise of AC ?

      I just watched a two show about Chicago in the 1920s leading up to the St. Valentines Day Massacre.
      Chicago Mayor Big Bill Thompson with his “Vote early, vote often” advice.
      North side Irish v South side Italians.
      And Leonardo DeCaprio bears a striking resemblance to a young Dion O’Banion, whose side kick “Hymie Weiss” (in reality a Polish Catholic) looks a lot like Johnny Depp.
      There is a movie in there somewhere for those two!

    • mario August 14, 2014, 2:49 am

      Watch out for the Chinese regarding Atlantic City. They’re buying up Detroit and other fallen cities. In the case of Detroit, its very positive as its a boon to the auto industry there, so it should be good for the economy. In the case of Atlantic City, if they can start swinging enough deals and incentives to turn Atlantic City into their U.S. based “Macau” , then it will happen. Don’t be at all surprised to hear soon that a Chinese group has purchased so and so building there.

      Cheers, Mario

      &&&&&&

      Mario, I grew up in Margate, on the same island as Atlantic City, and I watched the town turn into an unmitigated dump over the course of five decades. The last thing it needs to resuscitate itself is casinos. The town has a great beach with the finest sand in the world, healthful salt air and still-pristine, exhilarating surf. If the Chinese want to exploit these assets — presumably by building extensive cultural, entertainment, sporting and health amenities, and perhaps one Monaco-style casino, then I’m all for it.

      Too bad I didn’t know you 45 years ago, when I would have sought to exploit your connections and entrepreneurial energy in order to get the Inlet area of Atlantic City — the northern tip of the island where The Revel sits — developed as a piece. At the time, before the casino idea took root, the city was trying to redevelop a historical fishing village called Gardiner’s Basin that sits in a run-down but salvageable neighborhood with private docks and some nice old homes. You ought to see what the NJ Redevelopment commission put there instead. Tear it all down, I say, and start over. Know anyone who’d be interested? I’m serious RA

      • John Jay August 15, 2014, 7:18 am

        Rick,
        Investors interested in AC?
        I would think The Donald.
        I would think whoever is the current “Fat Tony” for Joisey.
        Fat Tony will most likely give you a better deal than DT.
        And, as a last resort, Snooki and her Guido pals.
        Glad to help you out with that!

        &&&&&&&&

        1. The Donald has the distinction of bankrupting two casinos, which must be some sort of record. Trump’s business acumen is hugely overrated, his big successes having come mainly from partnerships with people much smarter than he, like Pritzker. The Donald could never run for President because the shabby, take-no-prisoners way he treated local vendors when his first casino went bankrupt would come to light. He never took his act to Vegas because it would have invited comparison to Steve Wynn. Wynn, a big-time speculator of true genius, is the only guy who could have saved Atlantic City. But he left early on because he was fed up with the city’s and state’s Mickey Mouse way of running things.

        2. All the Fat Tonys were literally killed off when the New York and Philly mafiosi went to war over the mistaken belief there was money to be skimmed in Atlantic City. They were wrong because, from the get-go, casino workers rejected unions; and because the casino control commission arbitrarily denied vendor licenses to anyone whose name ended with the letter ‘i’ or ‘o’. Ironically, it was Jews — my high school buddies, actually — who won casino contracts for laundry, tobacco and other ancillary businesses that had traditionally been mobbed up in Atlantic City, albeit at a low level. Meanwhile, local hoodlums like Nicky Scarfo and Phil Leonetti all went to prison.

        3. Snooki and her Guido pals bear no resemblance whatsoever to any New Jerseyan I ever knew, or met, growing up. They were in fact a suburban-New-York-City species of white trash. RA

  • Jackson August 12, 2014, 6:03 am

    I don’t understand how short covering can take the Dow from from 7000 to 16000.

    &&&&&&

    It doesn’t, not exactly. Constant buying by the mountebanks charged with throwing Other People’s Money at stocks has provided buoyancy throughout the bull market. But short covering is the only kind of buying power sufficient to pop stocks through prior peaks and levels of heavy supply. RA

    • mario August 12, 2014, 7:00 am

      Let me explain. As I live in Shanghai , I’m watching the futures while America is sleeping. During such low trading volume periods, major players with influence and billions of dollars can rather easily move the price trend in the desired direction. While they are aware many bears are short in America on the cash indexes, those traders can’t do anything until the opening bell. Hence they face only the sudden gap up our down at the open, not the continuum of the futures overnight. So if the market o opens gap up, all those amateur shorts close their positions further fueling the squeeze. This picture of the tape has been going on for several years since ’09 , with the development of HFTs, QE and related unfair practices that manipulate the market.

      Rick, did I do good? 🙂

      Cheers, Mario

      • Jackson August 12, 2014, 3:55 pm

        Totally understand and agree that can and does happen. I’m however, questioning if that changes the primary trend. It seems like some people who don’t believe the fundamentals support recent stock prices simply cry manipulation. On a daily basis I’m sure it happens often but I don’t buy the idea that “they” created this bull market that otherwise would have been a bear market if it were not for their deviousness. Its more plausible to say there has been more buyers than sellers for a limited amount of shares. Whether or not the buying is justified is another debate. Also, Jesse Livermore said a market can only be manipulated in the direction of its primary trend.

      • Jason S August 12, 2014, 5:22 pm

        Jackson, yes there have been more buyers than sellers but it is the deviousness of the central banks that created those buyers. By keeping rates below the market rate it forces savers to either earn zero for a protracted period of time or take on more risk than they would normally to earn something greater than zero; creating buyers. By their buying of bonds to the tune of $85 billion+ per month for a long period of time (quantitative easing) it has injected borrowed dollars into the banking system. It was hoped those banks would use those funds to lend but they have moved the money over to their trading desks; creating buyers. The companies themselves have a surplus of capital that they are reluctant to spend on plant, equipment, etc. so they sit on the cash. Since their borrowing costs are near zero they have borrowed hundreds of billions of dollars to buy back their own stock because this is the best business option available to them since regulations and economic stability are uncertain; creating buyers.

        All the while, the public for the most part has stayed out of the markets and this has created a dearth of sellers vs. the (manipulated) inflated buyers. Voila, the market goes up…to infinity and beyond.

        &&&&&&

        It was recently reported that more than half of all stock-buying now is companies buying back their own shares. RA

      • Rick Ackerman August 12, 2014, 5:49 pm

        Yes, very nice, Mario. The thing to understand is that global finance is just a carny midway game; that everyone on Wall Street with an office above the 20th floor is an unindicted felon; and that a news media that takes the whole game seriously is just a bunch of clowns engaged in a circle-jerk. They are a class act, though, compared to the Fed governors.

      • mario August 14, 2014, 2:44 am

        We’re all on track with these issues. Jason “. It was hoped those banks would use those funds to lend but they have moved the money over to their trading desks; creating buyers” hits the mark. At the end of the movie on the crisis, forget the name now, Bernanke glanced out the window “They will lend it out, won’t they?” or something like that. Well we know they didn’t, exactly as you said, they’ve kept the money for themselves and leveraged it 40/1 again into this bull market, screwing the average American out of interest based retirement income along the way. A new monetary system chess game with serious faults to say the least.

        Cheers, Mario

    • redwilldanaher August 13, 2014, 1:57 am

      If you search around the web you’ll find a study that concluded that over 85% of the rise from the lows was attributable to overnight futures jam jobs, not the daily and widespread purchasing of equities by institutions that many would have you believe.

  • Frank August 12, 2014, 12:46 am

    Bought some TZA this afternoon. I’m probable a moron but I will buy more at 1950 or above. I examine many, many charts and nearly all tell me to sell. However, I do understand that the aristocracy can paint charts to their advantage and when they do I can just hear them laughing with glee.

  • Ksenia August 11, 2014, 3:25 pm

    I don’t understand. Why is everyone talking about new highs? Is the market immune now to everything that is going on in the world? Is Russian invasion off the table? Will Putin just let lose the influence over Ukraine, give up on Donetks, and allow all the rebels to die? Did not Ukraine just close truce talks and offer “Surrender or die!”?
    This stock market is a patheticl manipulated legalized casino!

    &&&&&&

    ‘Everyone’ is talking about new highs because short-covering bears have been frightened out of their minds by a bull market now in its 70th month. RA

  • John Jay August 11, 2014, 5:29 am

    I think “Weimar Lite” is Fed plan A,B,and C.
    You know, printing ………..”To Infinity and Beyond!”
    Bad debts are carried at par…..”To Infinity and Beyond!”
    Bogus BLS, GDP, etc. stats….. “To Infinity and Beyond!”

    When reality starts to bite, just “pop some smoke” and adjust the mirrors for the millionth time!
    The Electorate is busy watching the NFL concussion fest, or Tony Stewart at NASCAR turning the competition into “Road Kill.”
    Literally.
    As for the next generation, I believe Tom Hanks said on a WWII PBS show that a lot of young people believe that the USA and Germany were allies fighting the Russians in WWII!
    My, my, my!

    Anyway, I think the Monthly charts are still showing a solid uptrend for stocks.
    US T Paper looks strong too!

    And gas prices are still falling, Arco Premium has fallen to $3.69 a gallon out here!
    Gee, do you think that has anything to do with the upcoming mid-term elections?
    Hmmmm…………………………

    • Rick Ackerman August 12, 2014, 5:28 pm

      John: Check out Fergusson’s “The Day Money Died” if you want to understand why a Weimar-style hyperinflation is virtually impossible for the U.S.

  • Kratoklastes August 11, 2014, 3:39 am

    “…provided one is not sitting on the can, or moaning over Russian porn, when all geopolitical or financial hell breaks loose…”

    Are you confessing that you don’t take a tab (with a trading platform installed on it) to the can? UNFORGIVABLE.

    Also… with a decent multi-screen setup (mine’s a 3×23″ Samsung ‘borderless’, plus another machine with 2 ordinary screens) you can have porn on at least 1 of several screens.

    There is no longer any excuse to be blindsided by data, news, or porn.

    K

    &&&&&

    My day is ruled by digital devices, and I cherish those moments when I can get away from them. I don’t even take a cell phone with me when I go out at night. As for porn, wholesome interludes of anti-porn are possible with the Athleta catalogue. RA

  • Robert R August 11, 2014, 2:13 am

    Great post Rick. I appreciate all the hard work you’ve put in over the years. We’re on a pause halfway down the channel. Whenever it does this and stalls out, its just a pit stop to our ultimate destination.

    Same plan as you, I will fade anything that comes up as it won’t hold and I’m counting on news breaking somewhere on this planet that will spook these ass clowns once and for all.