One More Reason to Shun Hot Tips

[The following is a personal favorite that I re-publish from time to time. It originally appeared in the form of a column that I freelanced for several years to The Sunday San Francisco Examiner. RA]

Talk about a sure thing! Here was the kind of inside information that one imagined tumbled from heaven into the ears of the anointed. It concerned not the stock market – we’ll get to that part soon – but a pacer named Happy Yankee A that was running in the seventh race at Roosevelt Raceway outside of Philadelphia one evening nearly four decades ago. According to my source, this horse was not merely a strong bet to win, he was an absolute lock, lead-pipe cinch. This horse absolutely could not lose. What’s more, the Yankster had looked so tired the last few times out that he would probably go off at fat odds.

My tipster was Willie D, a storied acquaintance and unusually gifted confidence man who could loosen a mark’s checkbook the way a starfish pries open a clam. Here he was on the phone one Saturday morning – probably to everyone he owed – trying to burnish his karma with an offer of timely investment advice. One seldom saw or heard from Willie D around breakfast time, since that was when he usually went to bed. But that day he had stayed awake, he said, to get the word out. He wanted to give his pals enough time to borrow, beg or steal as much cash as they could by post time, the better to wager on the seventh race.

If word of Happy Yankee A’s expected trip to the winner’s circle had come from anyone else, I might have shrugged it off. After all, how many touts die rich?  But a hot tip from Willie? It seemed too good to pass up.  Although he had a serious jones for the trotters – one that often left him too depressed to get out of bed and too broke to buy a decent meal – Willie also had occasional winning streaks that would put him on top of the world, if only briefly. Over time, however, it was Willie’s peerless ability as a salesman that paid the rent.  He could in fact sell just about anything to anybody: Persian rugs, estate jewelry, sterling tea sets, tires —  and at county fairs and flea markets, a mysterious-looking gizmo known as the “SparkMaster” that was guaranteed to double one’s gas mileage.

But handicapping horses was his first love, if not a steady source of income, and he followed the sulkies around the U.S. to create an endless summer of betting opportunities: at Santa Anita, Freehold, Meadowlands and Kentucky’s Red Mile. It was  one summer, nearly 40 years ago, that he stumbled onto a fabulous secret that for a short while produced more sure-fire winners than a set of loaded dice. It was based on an observation that seemed to have eluded not only the attention of the rubes in the grandstands, but the astute instincts of the $100 bettors in the clubhouse. You see, Willie’s million-dollar ticket was to wager only on trotters hitched to a single-pole bike, the rig on which a driver sits. The shaft trailed directly behind the horse, using advanced principles of physics to reduce torsional drag. Only a relative handful of drivers ever came to use single-shaft rigs, and few outsiders seem to have realized what a considerable advantage they provided over conventional two-pole bikes that were attached to the horse on both sides. But Willie D surely did, and before the monoshaft was banned from the circuit later that season, it was his ticket to Fat City.

‘This Horse is a Lock-Up!’

As chance would have it, neither Happy Yankee A nor any of the other entries in the seventh race would be pulling a single-pole bike on that particular night. It didn’t matter, though, Willie reassured me. “The horse is a lock-up,” he said, “and it’s got nothing to do with the bike.” That was the clincher. I hadn’t wanted to rely on mere physics to give me and edge, but rather on some criminal scheme that made the seventh race as predictable as the next day’s sunrise. But I didn’t have much time left that day to raise a decent stake. It was a weekend morning and most banks back then did not have ATMs, so I spent the rest of the day cashing personal checks at local stores. By the time I’d hit up the hardware, the five-and-dime, a pharmacy, a supermarket and a candy store, I’d scrounged about $300, equal to about a week’s pay for me back then.

We digress now to a story that may sound familiar to many of you. It concerns the hot tip that is bound to come the way of any investor who is looking to double his money fast in the stock market. My tipster this time was not a confidence man, however, but a highly successful lawyer who told me that a large publicly listed company was about to be acquired by another at a price well above the market. He said he was too close to the deal to take a stake in advance of the buyout, but that anyone who jumped on the stock in the next day or two would be handsomely rewarded. How sure was he about this? “The ink on the contract is already dry,” he said. The buyout would be consummated by midweek.

Saved from Greed

As it happened, I did not take the plunge, but I would be lying if I were to tell you that my first impulse was to abide by the law, which strictly prohibits trading on insider information such as my source presumably possessed. No, it was only my inability to raise the approximately $6,000 it would have taken to buy 100 shares of the stock that saved me from my own greed. That, and the still-pungent experience of having waited six years for another such “done deal” to materialize.

If you can sense where all of this is leading, perhaps you’ve been burned yourself acting on a supposed tip from the inside. The truth is, most of the time even the insiders themselves don’t know how or if a deal is going to turn out. Over the course of my adult life I’ve probably heard about 50 such buyouts, but only a relative handful ever panned out.  And the ones that did were consummated months or even years after the date the tipsters had specified.

Fading in the Stretch

The lesson in all this is that next time someone phones with a hot tip about a stock whose price is about to double, you should grab your checkbook and run the other way. If it’s a well-connected friend who says the ink on the deal is dry, tell him you know someone who got his just desserts after acting on those very words.

As for the Yankster, he went off at 5-to-1, bolting like greased lightning from the gate. Out front by two lengths – make that four lengths – he blazed down the back stretch. At the final turn, it was Happy Yankee A by a two lengths, now a length, now a neck, uh, now . . . trailing . . . by a neck. Fading, fading, fading . . .

And you know the rest. Willie D went home that night zero-for-seven, too disgusted to stick around for the eighth race. I went home broke, never to bet again on a horse or to be so easily swayed by a tipster.

  • Redwilldanaher May 18, 2014, 2:44 am

    True sign of a top, Edwards and McGee called it the “rare chirping idiot formation” if memory serves…

  • Troll May 18, 2014, 1:16 am

    Just out of interest . . .

    How are all those “hot tips” from Zerohedge working out for everyone in here?

    Ya broke yet?

  • Rich May 17, 2014, 8:21 pm

    Rock and roll. Thanks.

    Long profitable weak on both sides of the trade.

    This most recent a high risk/reward trade.

    Rick’s Picks spreads smarter.

    Got lucky with strong Friday close up after buying the one day calls down to four pennies. Watched them with aloof bemusement go to a penny, not willing to add more to a losing position.

    Late in the day they traded up past 21 cent limit sell close to 28 cents, leaving money in the market for others.

    28-fold in one day a rara avis indeed.

    Pride goes before the fall.

    On any given day, have no idea when or where the market goes, other than following trends measured by Big4 COT Long Term, PnF Intermediate Term, Hidden Pivot Short Term and infrequent Sentiment turns.

    QQQ (NDX) of course the 100 largest OTC growth companies, including AAPL 13.13%, MSFT 8.37%,
    GOOGL 3.74%, AMZN 3.49% with market cap top third of the ETF.

    RUT 2000 small cap stocks appeared oversold -10%, offering relative value here, so switched from T Notes to Small Caps on Thursday close after UST gapped up on panic short covering and one of the most respected technical analysts on the street called for a -25% bear market in stocks.

    As a retired psychologist, pay attention to gut and watch ISE ISEE options closely for clues to speculative sentiment, especially what Bob Farrell called capitulation.

    Friday the Undervalued Opening Long Equity Calls/Puts opened at 313%, showing quiet, earnest accumulation.

    One key is buying undervalued and selling overvalued premium, despite cognitive dissonance herd instinct bias pulling hard the other way.

    More Keynes:

    Investing the one sphere of life and activity where victory, security and success always to the minority and never to the majority. When I find people agreeing, I change my mind. When I can persuade the Board of my Insurance Company to buy a share, that, I am learning from experience, is the right moment for selling it.

    ISE measures opening longs only, so may be a better objective measure of sentiment than CPCE, also giving a buy signal with a peak number of puts bought/sold lately.

    On Friday close the 23 May 2014 QQQ 88 calls were trading with a lower implied volatility than the 87.63 puts. Small number of QQQ MAY 23 2014 88.00 Calls Bought to Open @ $0.52 @ 3:36:00 PM on 5/16/2014, in case of runaway low VIX market with traders caught out or covering shorts.

    Maybe all this makes clear why Hidden Pivots are much simpler for success.

    Regards All

  • Rich May 16, 2014, 9:14 pm

    QQQ MAY 17 2014 87.50 C – 03:10:00
    Sold to Close @ $0.21

    • gary leibowitz May 17, 2014, 6:07 pm

      On a roll! I am non-committed on next direction. Stepping back I do see that the whipping motion has not produced any decisive direction. I guess that is a plus for assuming the market is in a correction with break out potential. The long indecisive action of late has to show its hand soon. I see you are betting that the Russell 2000 breakout in a big way. Good luck to you.

  • mario May 16, 2014, 4:56 am

    Quite an unexpected exception yesterday in that LNKD didn’t budge during that swan dive and in fact closed up. I was short, didn’t budge much, what the?…. I flipped long at the bottom so if we get a volatile, lnkd in will probably lead it…

    I like using LinkedIn, doesn’t mean I think the stock valuation isn’t ridiculous….

    Cheers, Mario

  • John Jay May 16, 2014, 3:22 am

    Gary,
    “First off Government policy has not JUST enriched the elite.”

    Well, Gary, follow this link:http://tinyurl.com/lxvn7ks
    And tell me if the people covered in this article have been
    “enriched” by the Federal Governments policies.
    They lost their 5 bedroom house when their jobs vanished, and have been reduced to selling home made popsicles to meet their $800 a month rent for an apartment out in the boonies because the $8 an hour jobs available are not enough to live on.
    That’s the trend out here, I don’t know about NYC where I believe you live.

    “As for commodity prices the facts go against your assumptions.”
    Gary, I just pulled up monthly charts for:
    Soybeans, from 500 in 2006 t0 1700 now.
    “Beans in the teens” used to be a joke, remember?
    Feeder cattle from 90 in 2010 to 186 today .
    Corn was at 300 in 2006, it is at 678 today.
    Gasoline from .96 in 2009 to 2.97 today.
    And demand for gasoline in the USA has fallen by more than 50% over that time period.
    Link: http://tinyurl.com/7rdzt77
    Copper was 1.40 in 2009, it is 3.16 today.
    Has what you pay for Health Insurance, Property Taxes, Electricity, Car Repairs etc. gone up or down since 2006?

    “Fed money printing, 5 years and counting, have gone against the natural forces of deflation. the trend is long enough for you to notice this is the case.”

    Gary, Fed money printing has been going on for 50 years, not 5 years.
    And inflation has been the Trend sine the LBJ Administration.
    As I have posted before, when I was a kid a house in CT was 20k, gasoline was 20 cents a gallon, a new car was 2k, and a postage stamp was 3 cents!
    Gary, inflation has been non stop for 50 years and counting, and it is not just myself that has noticed it!
    Deflation will never happen Gary, never.
    Because it would mean the TPTB would face a Romanov Moment, and they will never let that happen, never.

    In summing up, if the Federal Government had not added 70 or 80 million un-needed immigrants since 1965, had not shipped millions of jobs out of the country, had not fought non-stop foreign wars since 1945, had not stopped minting silver coins and a gold backed currency, would we be in this sad situation of ruin today?
    I submit there is plenty of evidence that we would not!

    • redwilldanaher May 16, 2014, 4:54 pm

      JJ thanks for slapping Gary around. Reminds of the fall of Cobby in the Asphalt Jungle…

    • gary leibowitz May 16, 2014, 8:16 pm

      Not sure what you are arguing for or against. Government subsidies has helped the poor. You want to argue this point? Soc. Sec. and Medicare alone prevent a 5 fold increase of the poor. I thought everyone here was against these handouts? Now you think it’s not enough?

      As for commodity prices they are no different than the stock market, it is cyclical. The fact that CHINA has to import a lot of their commodities has produced a growing demand. Technology now allows for smaller acreage to supply the same output, along with ways to prevent disease from destroying crop.

      I agree that inflation has to increase in a capitalist society. I absolutely agree. You simply ignore the fact that wages, housing assets, and savings also went up. To compare how much a car costs in 1930 to today is ludicrous. what was the standard of living? How much of a persons wages was needed to purchase these products. In the last 5 years we had massive money pumping yet deflation forces are winning out. How do you explain the fact that real inflation hasn’t taken off? The amount of debt is hindering real growth today. Sorry but the last 5 years should have produced massive hyper-inflation worldwide if the printing press was the only source for this action to occur. Obviously it is not.

      You complain that once the dam broke things are lousy? Well I agree. To blame immigration and outsourcing on the government is not a good argument. Corporations benefit from this, not the government. In fact they lose money in revenue. They were bought off, but that has been going on for a long time with no citizen outcry. Guess what. If the masses get angry over a united cause they vote in their person to represent them. It hasn’t happened yet simply because we haven’t gotten angry enough. Do you really believe our government can’t be replaced with opposing minds overnight? The vote is still the most important tool to counter abuses. We always seem to stay complacent until it affects everyone.

      • John Jay May 17, 2014, 5:11 am

        Well Gary, we agree on some points, we disagree on some others.
        It’s fun to argue back and forth, but I am always reminded of a great Smashing Pumpkins refrain:

        “Despite all my rage,
        I’m still just a rat in a cage!”

        Because that is where we are all truly positioned now!
        Make some money, it’s all we have left to us now!

      • gary leibowitz May 17, 2014, 5:57 pm

        Thank you for the nice discourse. I apologize for my temper. It does get the bets of me. I am the rat that is content to be in that cage. I do not spend my time contemplating what if. You can enjoy life that is given or chase windmills in the hope of some fantasy utopian scenario which will never happen. On the very rare occasions it does come true, it is always less satisfying than imagined. There is no perfect world, and never will be. To proclaim life today is a struggle begs the question just how intolerable life was in the past. Is there any disagreement that it was much worse? We complain all the time and never step back and enjoy what we do have. When it does change we inevitably change our view of the past with rose colored glasses. In spite of all the doomsday proclamations we are living in a world that has given us such luxuries and contemplative time to voice out complaints. In the past we were too busy just trying to survive.

  • Rich May 15, 2014, 10:52 pm

    Another overnight trade:

    QQQ MAY 17 2014 87.50 C – 11:30:44
    Bought to Open @ $0.13

    PS:

    Vlad Dracul’s castle for sale ~

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2014/05/14/draculas-castle-is-now-for-sale-in-romania/

  • Rich May 15, 2014, 4:52 pm

    Thanks Gary
    QQQ MAY 17 2014 88.00 P – 10:43:46
    Sold to Close @ $0.97
    Left a lot in the market for present company.

    • gary leibowitz May 15, 2014, 5:48 pm

      What tipped you off? Purely technical I suspect. Not Ricks system by itself.

      • Rich May 15, 2014, 10:55 pm

        Rick’s Hidden Pivots rule

        &&&&

        Not today, though, I must report. See my DJIA tout. RA

      • Rich May 15, 2014, 11:49 pm

        Saw it and still think Dow up a good call.
        Mr $3.5 B year spoke and the market swooned.
        In fact he bot FB, GOOG, PCLN, QQQ.
        Tomorrow’s another day.
        We are less than -2% from All-Time Highs and sentiment stinks.
        $INDU target +7% to 17,600
        IWM target +50% to 163.
        $SPX target +10% to 2040.

      • mario May 18, 2014, 2:06 am

        If sentiment stinks now, which it does, no way this downdraft continues……ha:) the market is predictable, I’ll soon be a filthy rich trader in no time at all….

  • Rich May 14, 2014, 8:27 pm

    Bought QQQ March 17 2014 88 puts @ 33 cents for an overnight trade

    • gary leibowitz May 15, 2014, 4:46 pm

      Great call. The support could be tested today. NASDAQ of 4,000 is just around the corner. The 10 year bond is telegraphing that economic rebound from the winter doldrums is not going to happen.

      Odds now favor a 20 week correction of some 10 to 20 percent drop.

      • Oregon May 15, 2014, 5:14 pm

        Pardon, gary, I know you are focused like a laser on the market right now, but when you said,

        “Analyze and make conclusions on all verified data. That’s all I ever ask. Discuss those conclusions and keep an open mind.”

        I thought you meant it. I did the work you asked, it’s almost all Dept. of Education data, just the kind you like, but you kind of left me hanging up there on the whole ‘state of teachers’ thing.

      • gary leibowitz May 15, 2014, 5:42 pm

        You skirted the question. 50 percent attrition in 5 years? Why? No answer. You claim its only 4 percent higher than all other jobs, yet we are ONLY talking about the very high salary and retirement perks given to teachers in government situation. Do these other jobs have the pay scale and perks the teachers do? Education level? Responsibility? Forced clients (students) you have to perform for, regardless of social class, manners, mental capacity?

        So the reason teachers leave their jobs is because nationally all jobs have similar attrition. Really? Do people leave their job or profession? An accountant leaves that profession, or a tech person? Jumping from job to job is NOT the same as switching professions.

        Just tell me why anyone with such a great package would leave, let alone 50 percent. Common sense dictates that something is amiss with that job.

      • Oregon May 16, 2014, 7:12 am

        Oh gary, so many slippery slopes and so few facts. Your one sided (teachers union) assumptions are looking worse. After more research it turns out that 50% includes teachers who move to a different school. The real number for teachers leaving teaching within 5 years is 30%. Even the 4% higher turnover for teachers compared to other fields was revised down and is somewhere between even, to 4% less leavers than other fields.

        You are shooting from the hip and acting very cocky for someone without data.

        Skirting the question? I don’t think so. My answer remains the same as it was a week ago; HUMAN NATURE. People leave teaching for many reasons, BECAUSE THEY CAN AND/OR WANT TO, same as switching majors, or getting divorced, or switching genders, or changing churches, etc.

        “…yet we are ONLY talking about the very high salary and retirement perks given to teachers in government situation. Do these other jobs have the pay scale and perks the teachers do?”

        I thought you said teachers were underpaid? Now you are saying they receive a “very high salary” and other jobs don’t have the “pay scale and perks”

        I do not think teachers are overpaid, nor do I think they are underpaid. I think the pension system may be unsustainable, but they get what the market will bear. When there is a shortage of teachers the salary will increase. States can demand a Masters (33 do) because there are enough people who will get it. If students collectively refused to get a Master’s the states would accept a Bachelor’s or pay more for the Master’s.

        “Do people leave their job or profession? An accountant leaves that profession, or a tech person? Jumping from job to job is NOT the same as switching professions.”

        Yes, other professionals leave that field, at the same or up to a 4% higher rate than teachers.

        “Just tell me why anyone with such a great package would leave, let alone 50 percent. Common sense dictates that something is amiss with that job.”

        It is a fair package, and it’s 30% that leave, and 20% that move. Common sense dictates there is something amiss with EVERY job.

        gary, I have answered every question honestly and openly. I have done far more research than you and I say that teaching is a difficult job, it is not for everyone, and many will leave, but that doesn’t mean teachers have it any worse than any other working class stiff. I am done with this subject.

      • gary leibowitz May 16, 2014, 9:24 pm

        Oregon, you seem to miss the point. Teachers and the Union were considered to be extreme examples of government excesses. You just stated that’s not the case. Well than I agree. If it was such a good package you would have to be nuts to turn it down.

        http://www.learningspy.co.uk/education/why-do-so-many-teachers-leave-teaching/

        The article questions why with no answers other than to state something must be wrong and fixed. This bunch think it is the greatest job in the world. Now you tell me which side are you on?

        I love it when people like to twist the argument away from the main theme. To repeat: If this is an example of government excesses why aren’t the people enjoying that excess taking advantage of it?

      • gary leibowitz May 16, 2014, 9:32 pm

        Oregon, did you really mentioned that every job is the same as teachers? I get no pension, and guaranteed pay scale. I get no guaranteed job protection from a union. I get no medical package after I retire.

        You argue my point by reinforcing it? Are you stating all jobs get the same treatment with pensions and perks? You can’t have it both ways. Try and follow this simple logic. If teachers do get more pay and perks why would they leave in droves. How about, why wouldn’t they do everything possible to stay if it is so good? Obtuse? You bet!

      • Oregon May 17, 2014, 12:40 am

        “Oregon, did you really mentioned that every job is the same as teachers?”

        gary, stop drinking your bath water.

        I have said all I am going to say on this subject. I have been very clear on how I feel about the subject, and if you can’t figure it out than you are as dumb as I thought you were.

  • D.B. May 14, 2014, 5:22 pm

    Got a gut feeling. In New York, DJIA at 17209.
    🙂

  • John Jay May 14, 2014, 6:49 am

    Mario,
    At least the old time Oligarchs like Carnegie and Ford actually produced things and created jobs for the masses.
    And they gave back to society in general.
    As a young boy I spent many happy hours in a Carnegie built library.

    The 21st century Oligarchs are closer to the Japanese Yakuza than they are to Ford and Carnegie.
    Nowhere to run, nowhere to hide for the proles! And
    we are increasingly at their mercy, and they are unsympathetic, and not merciful at all.

  • Redwilldanaher May 14, 2014, 4:35 am
    • Oregon May 14, 2014, 7:33 am

      “Imagine the equivalent of the lives of 2.7 million children snuffed out to serve the whims of the third richest man in the world. Most people would say that’s a story, most likely several.”

      Wow, so dramatic! 2.7 million snuffed out? That’s nothing compared to the shower drain when I was a teenager!

    • mario cavolo May 15, 2014, 2:47 am

      Wow, this is nasty and sad stuff about Buffet…

      • Oregon May 15, 2014, 6:22 am

        Why? Is there anything better for the planet than to support the abortion of human spawn?

  • dk May 13, 2014, 4:58 pm

    Sorry for the off-topic posts, Rick. Just received this email –

    “A conundrum….very strange

    The definition of the word Conundrum is: something that is puzzling or confusing.

    Here are six Conundrums of socialism in the United States of America:

    1. America is capitalist and greedy – yet half of the population is subsidized.

    2. Half of the population is subsidized – yet they think they are victims.

    3. They think they are victims – yet their representatives run the government.

    4. Their representatives run the government – yet the poor keep getting poorer.

    5. The poor keep getting poorer – yet they have things that people in other countries only dream about.

    6. They have things that people in other countries only dream about – yet they want America to be more like those other countries.

    Think about it! And that, my friends, pretty much sums up the USA in the 21st Century.

    Makes you wonder who is doing the math.

    These three, short sentences tell you a lot about the direction of our current government and cultural environment:

    1. We are advised to NOT judge ALL Muslims by the actions of a few lunatics, but we are encouraged to judge ALL gun owners by the actions of a few lunatics. Funny how that works.

    And here’s another one worth considering…

    2. Seems we constantly hear about how Social Security is going to run out of money. How come we never hear about welfare or food stamps running out of money? What’s interesting is the first group “worked for” their money, but the second didn’t. Think about it…..

    3. Why are we cutting benefits for our veterans, no pay raises for our military and cutting our army to a level lower than before WWII, but we are not stopping the payments or benefits to illegal aliens.

    Am I the only one missing something?”

    • dk May 13, 2014, 5:02 pm

      And no, Gary (and others), my personal views are not reflected in the above.

    • John Jay May 13, 2014, 6:50 pm

      dk,

      That is a great summation of our situation.

      Why do we find ourselves in this position in America?
      Because it is Government Policy to enrich a few thousand Oligarchs who have effectively seized power here.
      And if America is destroyed in the process, and her population impoverished, not only does it not concern the Oligarchs, it is an endless source of amusement to them.

      Why hasn’t there been a Popular Revolt in response?
      Well, there was a nascent Popular Revolt back in the 1960s, but a strange sequence of political assassinations left the various reactionary movements leaderless.

      Think about it.
      After JFK, from the far left, to the far right, from George Wallace, to Malcolm X, RFK, and MLK, leaders seeking change were gunned down by “Lone Gunmen”.
      And once this threat to the Oligarchs was strangled in the crib, miraculously, all the Political Assassinations ceased, just like that.
      Ceased, just like that!
      Amazing!

      After that, the Horatio Alger myth sufficed as a set of virtual shackles to keep the proles blaming themselves for their stagnant wages and increasing use of debt to survive.
      So Open Borders and Free Trade were right there for them to see, and they just went back to College to train for jobs that immediately went to H1B workers.
      The Fed/Government helped out with various Bubbles in Dot Com, Real Estate, Student Loans, etc.,
      to maintain the illusion that anyone can be a millionaire if you just try hard.
      And as each Bubble popped, the level of debt increased, and the poverty worked it’s way through another demographic level.
      In my view, here is where America is headed:
      http://tinyurl.com/mfjfnbp

      And here is my prediction for the Governments response as food price inflation grows to the point where it can’t be ignored:

      “The increase in food prices is strictly a consequence of Climate Change, something your Government has warned about for years.
      It is not an effect of Fed money printing, not at all.
      It is, once again, your fault, so, consequently, we need to impose a special tax on you to punish you for your intransigence regarding this matter”.

      Wait and see.
      Wait and see.

      • mario cavolo May 14, 2014, 3:58 am

        Indeed JJ! The oligarchs have impoverished the nation in the name of their pursuits… That’s a perfect and unfortunate description of the clearly evident reality.

        We have a serious problem note the leaders. What shall we then do with $80 billion per month over five years for the sake of our country America, its society and economic system?

        Funnel all of it to the “society” or funnel it to the rich bankers? Yes, at first, let’s funnel all of it to the bankers.

        Ahh, we have now impoverished 100 million lower/middle class citizens. Now we must support them. More and more on food stamps, benefits, Obamacare.

        Well I happen to think that after ruining them, you SHOULD support them. No no!, It is every man for himself in America, we oligarchs are individually legally FREE to do as we wish! And so are you little guy, so go build yourself a business! You have no excuses! Oh really? You take away my opportunities, make yourself rich in the process and now you tell me “I have no excuses and you shouldn’t help me because you’re against entitlements? Cute.

        Guess what?….since you have been allowed to become filthy rich and have your tens and hundred of millions and billions, you can easily afford to support them. However, it doesn’t work that simply, does it? We give you Obamacare subsidies to help you, the rich pay for your subsidy. GOOD, but its so poorly and unfairly implemented, the corruption in the healthcare/insurance system untouched before it was implemented, that everyone who is paying is getting screwed by outrageous rates. While the rich just keep getting richer, while the citizens’ wages remain flat for fifteen years now, while corporate earning, cash on hand and executive pay skyrocket to record levels.

        Pfft!!

        Cheers, Mario

      • Redwilldanaher May 14, 2014, 4:34 am

        JJ, I find it curious that Garo hasn’t opposed your commentary.

      • gary leibowitz May 15, 2014, 6:08 pm

        JJ, here goes. First off Government policy has not JUST enriched the elite. The majority of complaints right here is that government social programs are strangling us. So which is it? I will reiterate my position. BOTH. Politicians know how to get re-elected. is this concept so hard to understand? Just look at our ever increased policy of favoritism to elite and increased social entitlements. Both are happening together. the difference today is that the public is angry, the solution seems to be to attack the weakest group. Why would anyone cut food stamps? That goes directly into feeding people. Abuses? More so that other programs? Make government subsidies more accountable with verifiable need. The lowest of the low is food stamps.

        As for commodity prices the facts go against your assumptions. Increased population has produced greater demand, but technology has countered this with scientific advances on production capability. It is cyclical. In fact I find it miraculous that CHINA’s growth hasn’t caused world wide spike. The climate havoc is a problem. Population growth and viable land for growth is always a concern. I suspect we will get hit with another dust-bowl situation ala 1930’s.

        Fed money printing, 5 years and counting, have gone against the natural forces of deflation. the trend is long enough for you to notice this is the case. Which will win out? My money is on a nasty bout of deflation before we revert back to inflation worries.

    • mario cavolo May 14, 2014, 3:44 am

      Brilliant dk, thanks for posting this. I only want to comment on “America is capitalist…”

      No, in fact, starting fifteen years ago, it has steadily moved toward socialism, but the politicians/Mad Men ad industry/media continually work together to brainwash the sheep. That’s the problem with America, its in fact one way while the oligarchs continually stream out their on the surface fluff messages that it is another way. That’s also a key difference between China and America. The Chinese govt makes no bones that “the harmony of society comes before your “individual” rights. No, you CAN’T be an intimidating gang hanging out on the street corner with guns BECAUSE that is not good for the local community, for grandma and grandchild who need to feel safe. THAT is far more important than your individual rights. Hence, no loitering on the grass, and while it might sound oppressive at first, it in fact makes sense, serves an important purpose. ALL streets in China are lined with radar photo cameras and car count cameras. People still drive like idiots but that’s besides the point. No one cares, no one protests that a camera violates their individual Constitutional rights. No one tells the all male Toastmasters Club or Boy Scouts that because it is discrimination they MUST allow Susanna to join. The community of Toastmasters and Boy Scouts is MORE important than the individual’s rights. There is NO confusion about such things among the citizenry of China, such fiascos would never even come up and in fact are most laughed at by people outside of America. While that whole system of a more centrally planned socialist govt surely does have its own set of problems and weaknesses too, at least they’re not trying to pull the wool over their citizen’s eyes.

      Cheers, Mario

      • mario cavolo May 15, 2014, 2:43 am

        For Christs sake Gary they ARE victims! That’s why they’re in a position to have to even consider being on on subsidies in the first place!

        I of course will give plenty of weight to the idea that a man must make it happen himself. I am an entrepreneur all my life, every dollar I’ve ever earned has been a dollar I truly earned.

        BUT all of that happens WITHIN context. Put me on a deserted island with oligarchs in charge hoarding all the money and opportunities, making rules and creating situations that favor themselves and make it extremely difficult for me to climb the ladder and I am a victim of them, of the circumstance they created to serve themselves first. Then they feel sorry for me and throw me a bone so I can feed my family.

        Come on man, this is reality.

    • gary leibowitz May 14, 2014, 5:58 pm

      Well it’s easy to loom at it that way if you keep to the black/white theme.
      1. America is capitalist and greedy – yet half of the population is subsidized. No contradiction there. In order to be successful you must create losers. The higher the greed the more disenfranchised the losers. Capitalism and greed translates to the people that can affect this process the best.
      2. Half the population is subsidized – yet they think themselves victims. Cutting food stamps, keeping min. wages at 1960’s levels, and treating all people on government assistance as lazy will create a policy that ignores or marginalizes them.
      3. They think they are victims – yet their representatives run the government.
      4. Their representatives run the government – yet the poor keep getting poorer. Only partially true. While the masses are placated somewhat with social programs and the like, the politicians get most of their money endorsement from the big fat players. See how politicians can work both ends. Higher deficit, higher spending, lower taxes for the elite. States like NJ have a tax cut policy and their revenue is steadily decreasing and in the hole for millions. Moody’s cut their rating 6 times since the tax cuts. And so it goes…
      5. The poor keep getting poorer – yet they have things that people in other countries only dream about. True. Human nature. we always complain on what we don’t have.
      6. They have things that people in other countries only dream about – yet they want America to be more like those other countries. Used to be true. We used to crave for the EU standard of living until they went bankrupt. We never saw the third world as something to emulate.

      Your reference to Muslims and guns is bizarre. We are a Christian society and will never accept other religions as a model for our way of life. Muslims are today what Christians were a couple of hundred years ago. Correct me if I am wrong but Christian society RULED whole governments, suppressed math and science and literature, forced God and his teachings on everyone, was the cause of more wars and death than any other reason. As for guns, we do have a slew of real verifiable evidence that their is more accidents, death and violence than if we had not wrapped ourselves in the second amendment.

      2. Seems we constantly hear about how Social Security is going to run out of money. How come we never hear about welfare or food stamps running out of money? What’s interesting is the first group “worked for” their money, but the second didn’t. Think about it….. I have. We are already extending the social security age, cutting food stamps today, and reducing welfare benefits in states. Do you really think only lazy dead beats get these benefits? Look up the facts before you declare these statements as true.

      http://www.statisticbrain.com/welfare-statistics/

      • mario cavolo May 15, 2014, 2:56 am

        Actually Gary I do pay attention to what you write and am more tolerant of your thoughts than most here, but I can’t figure out whether you’re agreeing or disagreeing or what?

        Their representatives run the govt yet they keep getting poorer.

        “Only partially true. While the masses are placated somewhat with social programs and the like, the politicians get most of their money endorsement from the big fat players. See how politicians can work both ends. Higher deficit, higher spending, lower taxes for the elite. States like NJ have a tax cut policy and their revenue is steadily decreasing and in the hole for millions. Moody’s cut their rating 6 times since the tax cuts. And so it goes…”

        How does this explain that the poorer aren’t getting poorer? I’m confused…

        “We used to crave for the EU standard of living until they went bankrupt…”

        I don’t get it. WE are more bankrupt than EU. They have always enjoyed a much sweeter standard of living with longer vacation and more social programs. Nice if you can afford it of course and there’s the rub. But you can’t tell me that America workers WANT the crappy high pressure short holiday lifestyle they are in.

        My brother can’t imagine what a 2 weeks vacation is, let alone do it. That’s not a good thing.

        Cheers, Mario

      • gary leibowitz May 15, 2014, 4:39 pm

        Mario, the poor are getting poorer BUT the slippery slope has been tempered with government handouts to all. Imagine if our government only catered to their real constituents; the ones that help elect them. the trend would be much more dramatic.

        EU. Are we more bankrupt than them? Not by a long shot. In fact the chance that they remain a unified multi-country trading partner is 50/50 at this stage. Our single country still dominates over them in almost all categories when it comes to economic strength. While they DID have a very socialist attitude with their workers that is changing. They are emulating the “free trade” US policy. I expect their way of life to be gone in 20 to 30 years. Their tax structure is already at a much higher rate, so their ability to grow enough revenue in bad times is much harder to do. I do agree that the socialist EU philosophy is much to my liking, but I am not of the mainstream opinion. Just ask your fellow bloggers.

      • redwilldanaher May 15, 2014, 7:50 pm

        Another replay of the unbearable nothingness of El Garo. Rick has you pegged. More words than anyone with less and less impact. Sort of like every new dollar of debt and the “growth” it produces. Oh right, forgot, you’re still cheering the great global ponzi on…carry on….reflexively…

      • dk May 15, 2014, 10:00 pm

        Gary, I SPECIFICALLY followed up that post with another post, did you even bother to read it????? Obviously not. Those do not reflect my views (at least not in total).

        People here call you obtuse, you DEFINE obtuse. Your cranium must be made of Osmium.
        1) There need not be “losers,” as you put them, in a system that isn’t completely rigged the way this one is. Have you read the Creature from Jekyll Island? Do you know what the Fed does? Do you know the history of it’s owners and their influence on world history? Do you understand the cause/effect of this? Do you understand the where this path leads, where it came from, and who and how it affects people? Do you understand the topics we discuss on this board and how interrelated they ALL are? This “theory” or that, blah blah blah. Your light bulb needs changing, the filament is wearing thin.
        Do you understand the meaning of “probability?” It is amazing how you cannot seem to grasp these scenarios.
        2) The very PURPOSE of food stamps is dependency, social engineering, control; it is purely psychological. Path of least resistance, in fact, actively encouraged, then used as a ploy/tool.

        4) Not partially true, COMPLETELY true and as everyone knows, logically, in the back of their minds, there is no purpose in an elected official actually following through in their so-called “promises” to change any system, or go back to the fundamentals, that got that individual elected in the first place. Counterintuitive, but it sounds good enough to get votes with a tag line – “no new taxes,” “yes we can!” 😉
        This is ALL a game that you evidently do not understand, and that you will lose in the end.
        We still do crave what other countries have, ask around, but “wants” change with the tides. Give it up buddy, you can argue as much as you want, you’re wrong up and down on this yet you’re the only one who doesn’t see that.
        All of these dots point back to the same things.

        THAT reference to Muslims was one of the things I was talking about being not one of my views (but you conveniently went right past that). I’m with Mario in that we are NOT Capitalist, nor are we a Democracy/Constitutional Republic.

        You also missed the very first thing I wrote, “just received this email.” In other words, I did not generate this.

        Why do you think I put that addendum specifically with YOUR name mentioned? Typical of you, and typical of a Lib.

        You have always been and apparently will always be brainwashed, pure and simple. Talking to a brick wall.

        2) Again, I didn’t declare these things, it was an email. One system is purely a ponzi scheme, another is a social tool and both are a house of cards. Both are a reflection of this whole damn charade – look at who runs it, look at who it applies to, look at how it is funded (look at the damn Accounting behind it!), look at how unsustainable it is. Pretty simple.

        I am blessed not to be pigeon holed into your way of thinking, that’s got to suck. I hope, some day, you “get it.”

      • gary leibowitz May 16, 2014, 9:00 pm

        DK, sorry but your rants are just that. Food stamps are dependency like social security and Medicare. I agree. If you want all people to have the same physical and mental capacity that you do, with your moral background than you win. People are not all alike. People, thru circumstance or upbringing or genetic deficiencies have differing needs. have you actually looked at the stats on who gets food stamps and their circumstances? You love to bring up ONE case for your argument, but stop short to see if that represents a majority or not. in your head you can’t envision people ever needing these supports. I was brought up in a normal household with a father that was a WWII vet, carried two jobs when I was growing up, had 3 kids. My father moved into a government subsidized housing after the war. My mother worked till she got sick. She got very sick and even with government assistance spent all his money to help her. He was 62 when he got laid off of work permanently. he worked odd jobs after to make ends meet. he currently receives two pensions, both that got cut in half because his profession died out and the pool of expected money wasn’t there. He has spent all his savings and is getting help from the veterans administration. So PLEASE don’t talk to ME about welfare, deadbeats, and the dependency it causes. You are an IDIOT! If YOU were to fall into similar circumstances I am 100 percent sure you would be railing about the lack of help. Not only do you not have empathy, you refuse to look at the actual research that shows just where the bulk of the money goes.

        BTW, you posted someone else’s views that weren’t your own? You did this to show how wrong that view was? You did it as an experiment? Am I really that stupid? Perhaps I am. You re-post something you don’t agree because you thought it important for others to see? I

        Sorry, but I am a creature of logic. My profession was chosen because of my obsessive need to allow logic to control my life. I deconstruct everything. Throwing out one liners and conspiracy theories without taking in all components that make it whole, is dishonest. you make statement that have no connection to reality. You assume everyone is in your shoes.

        You have never heard me, and will continue to shut me out. I get it and can accept it. That still doesn’t mean I will stop adding my views. You demonize me and ignore the fact that I agree that this government is corrupt. I just am not as angry that the world should suffer and be punished for it. I also don’t believe history today is any different then it was centuries ago. Human nature is a mix of logic and emotions. They don’t always follow in the same path. Over the course of our history however you just can’t deny that we have advanced leaps and bounds in every way from the past. Is this time “different”? Logic dictates it is a normal flow of capitalism and emotional excesses. Sorry I don’t believe in the evil doomsday scenario. We are a self centered lot that always places OUR time as more important than any time in the past.

        I would love to hear from a constant contributor to the blog that agreed with Rick’s cheerleading pack, but no longer does so, due to new circumstance.

        The reason governments get away with these excesses is that they know as long as it affects only some people the others will ignore it. Apathy is a great device that helps these excesses go to extremes. They also know that the most likely victim to these outcries is the group that is even weaker than them.

        In the debt debacle of unprecedented proportions, the government has managed to save money on food stamps. Now tell me with a straight face that was your choice to right the wrongs. Am I missing something? To feel better about it you can always find the abusers and justify this act. The Reagan trickle down theory in reverse. Start cutting the bottom feeders and perhaps in a thousand years we will get to the real problem.

        Every single disastrous period in our short history was followed by major political change. It’s called the vote. While it doesn’t seem to be working in the time frame you would like, I can assure you it does work.

        Me, I worry about technology advancing beyond our emotional advancement. Emotional distrust and fear created the bomb and spy toys that could eventually destroy our freedoms. I hope this goes in cycles as well.

  • Robert May 13, 2014, 1:05 am

    I am not a horse betting man. However, a few years ago my wife’s father was running a horse in the Queen’s Plate which is the Canadian equivalent of the Kentucky Derby. The horse was a 16-1 long-shot. My father-in-law flew all of his children to the race including my wife. Before leaving my wife asked me if I would like her to make a bet for me. I gave her $20.00 and, as neither her nor I know anything about horse racing, implicit instructions to only bet after consulting with her father. Of course she didn’t follow my instructions and bet the full $20.00 plus $50.00 of her own money on the horse to win. Low and behold the horse won the Queen’s Plate. I had to chuckle when she gave me my $300+ winning dollars. This was my first and last horse racing bet.

    • Oregon May 13, 2014, 5:40 am

      Better to be lucky than good Robert. Glad to see you’re still around.

  • gary leibowitz May 12, 2014, 5:02 pm

    Hot tips rarely turn out so. It was unfortunate that my mindset of disbelieving hot tips worked exactly against me. It was in the early 80’s that I happened to read an obscure article in a local paper about a small public company that received a government order worth millions. I looked up this stock and saw there was no movement on its price, which was under 1 dollar. I went to my dad and asked him if he thought it was a good bet to gamble on this stock. His response, and my thinking, was that if it was in print the brokerage houses must already know about it. Turns out that wasn’t the case. One month later the news broke and it went up 25 fold. This was perhaps my single worse episode. It wasn’t the fact that I could have made money in a big way, but rather the idea crept in that there were indeed more hot tips to cash in on. Boy was I taken to the cleaners in those early days.

    I do however listen to peoples advice that have a proven record. Reggie Middleton was one such person. His bias was to look for over hyped over priced stocks. He hit some homeruns on that score. He was an accountant by trade and extrapolated trends, competition, and intrinsic value. He also had some gems that he thought was extremely under valued. His number one bet for many years was GOOGLE. I guess if you do your homework you can catch those long term huge winners. Facebook VS. Twitter are great examples. One had a very proven loyal base, with proven untapped earnings potential, while the other had no plan or vision. In all high-tech or web based businesses it is a gamble they are smart enough to stay ahead of the advances. The other person I use is Buffett when it comes to free advice. He is not a market timer, and never professes to be one. He does however do a great job in analyzing dominant companies in a growing business and picking those that are way under priced to its potential.

    So in the end it’s not the “hit tip” that works so much as the smart number crunchers who understand the business and trend. In essence they work well when the emotional bets cause a bargain entry point. Number crunchers stay razor focused when either “hot tips” or “bad news” cross the wire. They usually go against the emotional trend.

    • gary leibowitz May 13, 2014, 12:38 am

      Recent breakout or fakeout. Should be decided this week. Watch business inventory levels. It usually spikes higher in anticipation of expected sales. 10 year finally looks like it is starting on upward path. If I am right we should see that rate go another 75 to 100 basis points before the next decisive correction. Getting ever closer to a sizeable correction. No final top seen yet.

      • gary leibowitz May 14, 2014, 5:22 pm

        Oh well. Now the sales picture is clearer and bonds once again faltered, it looks like we are very close to a correcting phase. The 20 week cycle of headwinds are right around the corner. It usually indicates a low in October. Not seeing much more upside this month.

  • Carol May 12, 2014, 1:47 pm

    Funny. In the late 70s I was working my way through college and one summer I happened upon a waitressing job in the club house of a race track in Laurel Maryland (trotters). Our Maître d’ was a doctor at Johns Hopkins during the day but at night he worked the front of the club house so as to make his gambling obsession “seem” legitimate. Well this one night the Maître d’ comes to me and says “Carol I know you are working hard to put yourself through college so I am going to give you some good advice. Put everything you have on horses 1,2,3 – Trifecta (don’t remember the exact numbers of the horses) in the third race”. Well any bettor knows that picking a Trifecta is very hard but also pays off very well. So being the idiot I was, I didn’t have much money on me except what I had from tips at that point in time. So I had planned on wagering a “respectable” $20 dollar bet. BUT THEN I got really busy and missed the betting deadline. Wouldn’t cha know it but that damned Trifecta came in as told to me and my $20 dollar bet (had I actually placed it) would have paid my tuition and books for my remaining years of school!!!! sheeeeezzz what a dummy I was…..

  • John Jay May 12, 2014, 5:47 am

    I will tell a Cosa Nostra story that I posted once before concerning “Fixed” horse races.
    Joe Valachi, the first Made Man to turn informant I do believe, was a big horse race fan and Thoroughbred owner in his day.
    In the book about his life, “The Valachi Papers” he told the following tale.
    All the Wise Guys were lined up to bet on a fixed race where all the jockeys, trainers, etc. were taken care of, so it was a lead pipe cinch for this ringer to win.
    So, all the bets are placed, the gate opens at the start, and the ringer takes three strides…………. and breaks a leg!
    So, as the saying goes, you never know how it will work out.

    Bonus: Robots killing jobs report!

    As I was driving down Valley Blvd. in the City of Industry, I saw a sign twirler on the sidewalk, spinning an arrow shaped advertisement sign.
    As I took a closer look, it was actually a manikin rigged with an electric motor that was twirling the sign!
    First one I’ve ever seen.
    More bad news for the unskilled labor market!

    • mario May 12, 2014, 8:56 am

      Great book JJ…a mafia classic…

      • John Jay May 12, 2014, 2:45 pm

        Mario,
        I’ll always remember one of the gangsters in that book.
        Buster from Chicago, who carried, in the grand tradition, a machine gun in a violin case!

        In my more cynical mood, I’ve always thought the Federal Government destroyed the Mafia to clear the decks for themselves to takeover the drug rackets etc.
        Mike Levine at expertwitnessradio.com said that as a DEA agent when he he did too good a job stopping drug deals, he was told to “knock it off” by higher ups, because he was “hurting our case load”.
        Interesting podcasts and books on his adventures as an undercover agent for the Feds at that website.

  • Redwilldanaher May 12, 2014, 4:56 am

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-05-11/paul-craig-roberts-warns-us-economy-house-cards

    Off topic Rick but I really want to see how and to what lengths Garo will seek to impugn PCR, a former high-level insider.

    • gary leibowitz May 12, 2014, 4:34 pm

      Your silly assumptions go out the window with the following statement. All activity is recorded. Sales, manufacturing, borrowing, jobs etc…. You can’t get earnings from thin air. Just because the game was changed doesn’t mean you should ignore it. In fact, you should have doubles down when you knew the government would support this economy with trillions. As in this article about horse rigging, if you know there is a device that gives the rider an advantage, take it.

      My 4,000 word response from last article got 2 responses to my ONE question.
      Why would 50 percent of teachers leave such a great job with great perks in less than 5 years?

      Answers: OREGON Fact: I would not be a teacher for $100,000.00/year. Does that mean it’s not enough money, or that I don’t want to be a teacher?
      MAVA They make so much money, after 5 years they are set! Too much money!

      So I guess that was settled.

      • Oregon May 12, 2014, 4:56 pm

        gary,
        This is what you took from the above article?
        You took that as my answer to your question?

        You make obtuse an art form.
        I have been thinking that you must be very young and very naive when it comes to understanding human nature. I was very wrong.

        You are an imbecile.

      • gary leibowitz May 12, 2014, 6:07 pm

        Yet another real discussion on Union perks and how it just didn’t seem to be enough to entice half of those teachers to stay and enjoy it. In that 5 year period you receive NADA pension benefits. OUCH!

        A biased NEA retort to your assumptions. http://www.nea.org/home/12661.htm

        Masters degree is needed? Pay scale is comparable for that education level? Working conditions are just too good to be true?

        Your one-sided assumptions are EXACTLY why you believe the market had to have crashed already but not for the “faked” data. Try taking away your obvious bias and use real data without regard to cherry picking. Analyze and make conclusions on all verified data. That’s all I ever ask. Discuss those conclusions and keep an open mind. Now I know I lost everyone here.

      • Oregon May 13, 2014, 8:09 am

        gary, while a study of teachers, by teachers, clearly galvanized your assumptions that teachers in the US have it worse than ever, I was not convinced.

        What I found…

        Pupil/Teacher Ratio:
        During the 1970s and early 1980s, public school enrollment decreased, while the number of teachers generally increased. For public schools, the number of pupils per teacher—that is, the pupil/teacher ratio—declined from 22.3 in 1970 to 17.9 in 1985. After enrollment started increasing in 1985, the public school pupil/teacher ratio continued to decline, reaching 17.2 in 1989. After a period of relative stability during the late 1980s through the mid-1990s, the ratio declined from 17.3 in 1995 to 15.4 in 2009. The public school pupil/teacher ratio increased to 16.0 in 2010. By comparison, the pupil/teacher ratio for private schools was estimated at 12.2 in 2010. The average class size in 2007–08 was 20.0 pupils for public elementary schools and 23.4 pupils for public secondary schools.
        The number of public school teachers has increased by a larger percentage than the number of public school students over the past 10 years, resulting in declines in the pupil/teacher ratio. In fall 2002, the number of public school pupils per teacher was 15.9, compared with a projected number of 15.2 public school pupils per teacher in fall 2012.

        Salary:
        The average salary for public school teachers in 2011–12 was $56,643 in current dollars (i.e., dollars that are not adjusted for inflation). In constant (i.e., inflation-adjusted) dollars, the average salary was about 1 percent higher in 2011–12 than in 1990–91.

        Annual mean wages for teachers ($56,000) is higher than firefighters ($48,000), and the same as police officers ($56,000). (data may be a bit dated, but should be close)

        Annual turnover rates for teachers are about 4% higher than all other fields.

        Page 162 of the OECD 2013 ‘education at a glance’ shows that out of the 32 OECD countries listed (all the majors), the US has the highest expenditure per student for primary through tertiary schooling, which covers all expenditures on teachers, facilities, materials, administration, etc.

        Add it all up. What I see is that there are less students per teacher than the historic average, teacher salaries (inflation adjusted) are slightly higher than 20 years ago, turnover for teachers is 4% higher than other fields, and the US spends more per student than any country in the world. Would you like to discuss my conclusions with an open mind?

        And, gary, even if teachers don’t really have it worse than they have historically, there is nothing that says that you can’t personally give teachers a bonus, from your personal wealth. And nothing says that you can’t form a non-profit, with the sole function to collect private funding to give teachers bonuses. Incidentally, how are the homeless folks you took in getting along? Swimmingly?

      • VILE VLAD May 13, 2014, 3:02 pm

        Why do 1/2 of teachers,quit, forever teaching, after 5th year?

        fear of injury. fear of death.
        from their 21st century, zombified students.

        today’s kids are so wild, so stupid, so rampant, that they’ll blow away any teacher, for any reason, whatsoever, or for no reason at all. since most of them, are armed. and don’t care about anything. for it ain’t just drugs. it’s the empty, dead, non-culture.

        non-culture which obviously, was engendered, by the elite. so, no future. so, who cares. way of the world. for those whom are trained early, follow forever, trained parameters. and human kids are so easy to indoctrinate. amen. ‘and that’s the name of that tune.’

      • Oregon May 13, 2014, 4:43 pm

        Now you are on to something Vlad…

        Salary ranks third for reasons teachers leave, lack of administrative support ranks first. The most difficult part of my kids’ teachers job is dealing with unfocused, unruly students; and sometimes the parents are worse. Some of us are old enough to remember the paddle at school; it was a tool, and it set me straight a couple of times. Now teachers cannot touch a student, literally, and even harsh words are enough to get a teacher into trouble. My wife volunteers a couple days a week in the classroom and she sees kids that are often very bright, but have no focus, and disrupt the entire class while the teacher attempts to handle the situation without crossing the line, and very little support up the chain, or from the parents. And often there are two or three of these kids in one class.

        You are correct Vlad, teachers hung out to dry in a society that lacks parenting and discipline is the problem, and higher salaries, or better benefits will not fix this problem.

        My apologies for hijacking the thread a week late, but this has been a hot topic locally with some teacher strikes, and gary’s naivety forced me to take a closer look. I should thank you, gary, your teaching techniques are annoying and unconventional, but effective.

      • dk May 13, 2014, 4:46 pm

        Vlad, couldn’t agree more. I know of too many incidents and I know too many teachers. I’ve seen standardized testing results that are just sad, at the 8th grade level.
        I know of many teachers who “had to get out of there.”

        Trouble is, it isn’t just the “USSA,” it’s everywhere (although from what I’ve gathered there’s a concentration of it here).

        My better half stopped substitute teaching as a part time job out of college because of said behavior.

        Someone close to us has been treated twice in the last year for broken ribs being kicked in by a 5th grader and subsequently stabbed in the shoulder with scissors. No doubt that kid now a case study for the APA/AMA.

        When I was much younger, we had a “family” friend who ran an Army/Navy surplus store (of which few still exist) who stopped selling certain knives because of reports he’d received from youth attacking teachers with them and laughing.

        School house Skinner boxes, Iserbyt laid it all out in her awesome work:
        http://www.deliberatedumbingdown.com/MomsPDFs/DDDoA.sml.pdf

        Page 41 and on is for you Vlad.

      • dk May 13, 2014, 4:52 pm

        blah… “reports he’d received ABOUT youth attacking teachers with them and laughing.”

      • mario cavolo May 14, 2014, 3:31 am

        Hi Oregon, V…

        I’ve often sadly mused on the declining state of U.S. culture and society, noting that the disrespectful, snide, in your face behavior of its young people is the defacto indicator of its decline. Being quite traditional in my view, I don’t hesitate it is the destruction of the marriage/family bond, declining lack of respect and regard for the marriage/family bond which is clearly at the root of this evil. Even worse is that we can easily see how the society in general, led by an army of vindictive, divorced women, encourages the neutering of men, that “individualism” is far more important, that not having a father is no big deal, all rationalized away into a delusional, sad never never land. I am one of the men and fathers who is very much a victim of what I have described, but that does not bias my view, it only causes me to clearly see what the reality is in that country. Filial piety and respect for elders and parents…good grief, it is still present in pockets and communities in America but it is no longer the mainstream thinking.

        When my wife and I pondered “Where do we want our son educated and raised from age 3 to 10, the primary answer was “not in America” and we are no surprised at how many people agreed with our view. Mainly because of how it will impact our child to sit in a classroom in which 50% of the kids in the room are emotionally damaged, even disruptive because they are the victims of a typical American style divorce and within a society on which TV shows proudly display all such things as “normal.” So little is written about how much they are damaged, nah, they need to learn to be good “individuals” and if they are not, they have ADD, let’s put ’em on Ritalin.

        Who then are first in line to face these young, emotionally damaged, neglected, abused, unloved monsters on a daily basis at 8:30 am five days a week?….indeed, the teachers, who want very much to care and to help but are spitting into the wind of the community in which they hope to do their job well.

        I’ll skip the word “Cheers” on this one.

        Mario

      • gary leibowitz May 15, 2014, 5:28 pm

        Oregon, I commend you for “looking it up”. No mention of the 50 percent turnover rate, other than saying it is 4 percent higher than all other types of trade. not comparing apples to apples. They have a mandatory college degree. Most states require a Masters within that 5 year period. All studies I read said they are way underpaid compared to education skill. As for “having it so good” with Union perks, no one has explained why they leave? If they receive an inordinate good pay and perk privileges, why would they leave? Teachers have to “control” a classroom with children that are forced on them. They have to perform to tests and measures regardless of the child’s emotional or mental state, and family situation. Now tell me, which other profession has these conditions?

        In ALL studies on government jobs, be it sanitation, fire, police, teachers, the pay scale is commensurate with ability to fill those positions. The reward of staying in a UNION is that longevity pays off. It’s the study on longevity that seems to indicate that the time it takes to reach the good reward is offset by some difficult working conditions. Please answer me why they leave if they know they will have a great retirement? The burden is on YOU to show me why teachers have it so good. No person in their right mind would leave a great job with great pay and retirement perks. NO ONE.

      • dk May 15, 2014, 9:23 pm

        First, I never said YOU said that and I think that is debatable. We are the petri dish, the concepts, I think, originated elsewhere.

        “thus, destroying natural order of the human family– dad provides, while mom subsides”

        WE don’t disagree that this has been going on forever, including the constant promotions of other family disintegrating practices (at least in my opinion – but I’ll keep those to myself so as not to stir others, i.e. Gary and his Libs, et al)
        However, (clue) I don’t think (my opinion) there is a precedent for that “family order,” “family” yes, but not specifically that (or any) order, it’s just what most are accustomed to. Just a thought.

  • Rich May 12, 2014, 2:37 am

    On the subject of inside information Keynes said: “the dealers on Wall Street could make huge fortunes if only they had no inside information.”

    As Bursar, his Kings College Chest’s initial capital was £30,000. By the time Keynes died in 1946 the fund had grown to £380,000 – an annual compounding rate of just over 12 per cent. This might not seem very remarkable but for the fact that in the same period of time, the British stock market fell 15 per cent.

    http://www.maynardkeynes.org/keynes-the-investor.html

  • Andy Gutterman May 12, 2014, 1:58 am

    In 1990/1991 I was in Tampa, Florida visiting my father. He had cancer and we all knew he was going to die. He did, on February 2, 1991. I knew then and there that my Mom could not handle this so I took seven months out of my life to stay with her until she could deal with life on her own. Part of that was cleaning out the house in Massachusetts, later that year.

    So one day in 1991 some friends who lived in Tampa suggested we go to Tampa Bay Downs to watch the horse races. I knew next to nothing about the betting side, so for the first 3 races I bet on the horse to win, and lost all three times.

    But having a mathematical mind I quickly realized that if I could bet on the 1st, 2nd or 3rd horse to win I would do OK. Win, place or show. I made money for the next 7 races, making an average of 7% per race in profit.

    Win, place or show is the most common bet made at horse races, but I didn’t know that at the time. I just didn’t want to lose money on each bet.

    Very similar to trading stocks. Too bad I can’t seem to follow that scenario today. I bet the farm on one or two tiny stocks, hoping for the big payoff.

    I’ve often wondered whether or not I could make a decent living betting on horses. Seems like a 7% return per race should work, but for some reason I didn’t end up where the horse racing was so never followed up on it.

    Oh well. Bookselling is more fun anyway, even if I don’t make much on it.

    Andy