Spain’s Deflationary Quagmire

Spain’s deflationary quagmire now lies well beyond remedy, dooming Europe’s bold but ill-conceived attempt to forge a political and economic union under a single currency.  That Spain’s collapse is imminent should be obvious to all by now, as the country attempts to borrow its way back to prosperity amidst 25% unemployment, savage budget cuts and a flight of capital to banks in England, Germany and elsewhere.  Recall that it was just two weeks ago that the world’s bourses wildly celebrated a German constitutional court’s decision to uphold the latest bailout facility, the European Stability Mechanism (ESM).  Stocks and bullion rallied sharply on the news, acting as though yet more monetary pump-priming would somehow surmount the irresistible deflationary drag of the world’s imploding, quadrillion dollar derivatives edifice.  In fact, the supposedly all-knowing, all-seeing stock markets showed themselves to be deaf, dumb and blind to fact and reality, since the court’s decision actually raised more obstacles to a bailout than it eliminated. (Traders have since repented, having given up nearly all of their earlier price gains.)

Concerning the legal ruling, “the establishment of the ESM is about the only thing that the German court did say yes to,” our Australian colleague Bill Buckler noted in the mid-September edition of The Privateer.  “The rest of its ruling is a litany of the word NO!”  We quote the Privateer at length here, since Buckler appears to have been alone in describing what actually went down:  “In the first place, the court insisted that the German parliament must have a veto over any increase in Berlin’s Euro 190 Billion contribution to the ESM. Any increase in that amount would require the prior approval of both houses of the German parliament.

Oh, That EU Treaty…

“Much more important,” continued Buckler, “the court effectively vetoed any move to give the ESM a banking license by saying that any borrowing by the ESM from the ECB would be incompatible with the prohibition of monetary financing contained in the current EU treaty. The court also stated that: ‘An acquisition of government bonds on the secondary market by the ECB aiming at financing the Members’ budgets independently of the capital markets is prohibited.’ This clearly bans Eurobonds, although it seemingly does not ban the ECB’s purchase of existing government bonds on the secondary market – which is in effect the capital market.

“The German constitutional court clearly does not want the kind of open ended QE that the US Fed announced on September 13. Nor does it want ANY more German participation in potential European bailouts without the PRIOR consent of the German government. Finally, it says in effect that if Europe wants to go whole hog into money printing, they are going to have to change their treaty once again. And any treaty change requires unanimous consent from the EU. The German court – and the Bundesbank – still cling to the idea that a central banking system and sound money are not incompatible.”

Europe’s Day-to-Day Bills

Just so.  Anyone who thinks Germany is “on board” for open-ended loans to Spain – and also, by implication, to Italy, Greece and Portugal – needs to re-read the analysis above.  The same goes for those who believe an outbreak of inflation is imminent merely because Europe appears ready to try hairy-knuckled, US-style monetization.  As bankers, politicians, economists and news editors should have learned by now, to attempt to inflate is not necessarily to succeed at it.  At this point it is all dead money velocity-wise, and more and more trillions of it have become necessary to induce even the faintest blip of inflation, let alone a sustainable improvement in employment and housing.  For sure, a hyperinflationary thunderclap must eventually result from printing so much valueless money backed only be debt. In the meantime, however, we should expect debt deflation to continue to asphyxiate Spain et al. as the dying welfare state that is Europe struggles to pay its routine bills.

***

[For further details concerning the Hidden Pivot Method, click here for a free trial subscription that includes access to Rick’s Picks 24/7 chat room and the just-launched ‘Harry’s Place’.]

  • MEGA-BEAR October 1, 2012, 9:40 pm

    rick,
    you asked me if I could write an article under 650 words…
    &&&&&

    mega: You’ll need to furnish a proper e-mail address if you want to communicate about such things.

    RA

  • gary leibowitz October 1, 2012, 7:49 pm

    For what it is worth, the 4 year policy has not resulted in inflation, stabilized the banking system when most needed, allowed the dollar to stay low against other currencies, and didn’t create run-a-way commodity prices.

    There are always consequences to trying to hold the financial system intact. If we hadn’t exported our mortgage debacle overseas Ben might have actually succeeded. The backlash from his QE policy will come from overseas since it will negatively affect them the most.

    It was never intended to spur growth, just buy time. It has done that, but since the rest of the world is embroiled in the debt debacle we could see a short term detachment between us and the rest of the world. I still say domestic economic growth will surprise on the upside and perhaps create animosity from overseas.

    The big winners in the next few quaters will be financials.

    • RickJ October 2, 2012, 2:33 pm

      QE was intended to bail out the banks by indebting the public. Mission accomplished. Return missions planned.

  • RickJ October 1, 2012, 6:43 pm

    About the ESM………being denied a banking license.
    Let us think back to the founding of the Federal Reserve Bank. The initial powers of the the Fed were minor compared to today and the founders of the Fed freely admitted that they knew that by the politics of gradualism they would get their way.
    This time the plan seems more in order with the Beast of Brussels type solution with NWO Bankers in charge, beyond legal or political accountability. The European Parliament will have all the powers of a debating club.
    Welcome to the NWO.

  • BigTom October 1, 2012, 6:21 pm

    “The ECB buying member-nation bonds directly…. All it does is simplify the process of regulating commerce, and force attention to reducing systemic fraud and improving the quality of fiscal policy.”

    You can’t be serious….this is a joke, right?

  • roger erickson October 1, 2012, 4:07 pm

    The Fed, from 1933 to around 1950, bought T-bonds directly. That’s what a fiat currency system is. Then we went back to Primary Dealers by law or Fed mandate being required to buy any & all T-bonds. It’s all just a charade to drain banking reserves from the Fed’s double-entry accounting system. Bottom line is still just to not let unlimited swings in currency supply help trigger either inflation or deflation.

    The ECB buying member-nation bonds directly would be like our Fed buying our member state bonds directly. California would love that, as would all other 50 states. All it does is simplify the process of regulating commerce, and force attention to reducing systemic fraud and improving the quality of fiscal policy.

    The German courts & parliament don’t seem to understand much about currency operations at all.

  • roger erickson October 1, 2012, 4:02 pm

    “does not ban the ECB’s purchase of existing government bonds on the secondary market”

    “The German constitutional court clearly does not want the kind of open ended QE that the US Fed announced”

    ?? what part of QE DO they understand? 🙁
    this is really confusing

    QE is exactly “purchase of existing government bonds on the secondary market” … and that’s all it is!

    All QE does is push bond holders back & forth along the yield curve, since the Fed, each time, buys back T-bonds from specific segments of the yield curve (and either holds ’em, or sells them again later).

    That’s rather like a water cycle of drinking rain water, then wetting your pants to let the water evaporate? Net effect is functionally zero, despite what various people believe. No change in net financial assets. Just a slowly accumulating bad smell despite all the distraction?

    QE dynamics one more time- it’s about price, not quantity
    http://moslereconomics.com/2010/11/17/qe-dynamics-one-more-time-its-about-price-not-quantity/

    see also
    QE2 Two: Equivalent to Issuing Bills in the First Place
    http://www.benzinga.com/life/politics/10/11/623461/qe2-two-equivalent-to-issuing-bills-in-the-first-place

    and
    “QE in the US has again done what it’s always done- frighten investors and portfolio managers ‘out of the dollar’ and into the likes of gold and other commodities.”
    http://moslereconomics.com/2012/09/14/qe/

    and
    QE and the dollar
    http://moslereconomics.com/2011/08/12/qe-and-the-dollar/

    and
    PIMCO admits Fed’s QE2 Failed to Boost U.S. Spending
    http://moslereconomics.com/2011/06/02/duh/

    and
    QE2: Captain, your ship is sinking
    http://moslereconomics.com/2011/05/12/qe2-captblogain-your-ship-is-sinking/

    and
    QE and the term structure of rates
    http://moslereconomics.com/2011/03/10/qe-and-the-term-structure-of-rates/

    and
    Central Bankers comment on QE
    http://moslereconomics.com/2011/02/28/central-bankers-comment-on-qe/

    and … (the list could go on, but that should suffice for anyone willing to read any of these posts anyway).

  • gary leibowitz October 1, 2012, 3:56 pm

    In regards to Spain, I find it hard to believe imminent disaster is about to befall us. Spains austerity decision means that they flinched first. They no longer want to revert back to the old ways, nor can they. Their cut backs on goverment jobs obviously has a greater impact than in the States. There is no real solution to this problem other than trying to mitigate the collateral damage. They must try and straddle between deep cuts and a deep depression or “corrective” measures to slowly bring their financial house in order. Not sure if it is even possible. The EU impact on our domestic economy doesn’t seem to be all that great. The last 4 months seem to bear that out. Our concern should be China. Wiht no debt they can easily revamp their economy by spending, as they already announced that intention.

    Our economy is recovering despite all the news to the contrary. The bailouts were obviously necessary to bring stability to the financial community and to assure all lenders and borrowers they will not be abandoned. You can’t expect an “eye of an eye” type retribution. With any monopoly style industry, the choices are limited. I do however find it disconcerting that there is no legislation to break up this monopoly.

    As for why we are slowly moving forward, that too is simply because banks have a fiduciary responsibility to its shareholders. They have gone from wild abandonment of rules and regulations to one of extreme caution. It is a natural response, in which only time can heal. It seems to be healing given the fact that the housing data shows solid stability and recovery. You can’t have a surge in home prices across the board if this was not so.

    I know not one person here would have thought we could survive 4 years after the crisis, but we have. You can’t force the world to accept your notion that the end game will be disaster and fold up immediately. Markets and peoples don’t behave based on logic alone. They always cling to hope that we can somehow survive this crisis. 4 years later that hope is still alive and well.

    I still maintain that earnings, not the economy, will do very well in the immediate future. Any domestic improvement from here will be seen on companies bottom line.

    To deny that companies have profited handsomely from this crisis you would have to stick to a fuzzy ideology while ignoring the purely mathematical reasons. The assumption that productivity increased are short lived has already been proven wrong over the last 4 years. The numbers on current productivity do not indicate any change in direction yet.

    Stop rushing your conclusions onto the market. You might be right, but in this business timing is everything. Human behavior does not react immediately to logic. There is immediate results from corporate profits and until they can actually see a dramatic trend reversal the market will make no other conclusions, even if it obvious to you that there is no happy ending.

  • Bobby October 1, 2012, 3:42 pm
    • John Jay October 1, 2012, 4:31 pm

      Bobby,
      You are missing my point.
      I do not think the point is did this guy actually “conspire” to import the endangered orchids or not.
      I do not think the point is did this guy just plead guilty without going to court out of fear or for some other reason.
      The point is does it make sense to have Federal agents wasting time on trivial pursuits that should get the guy a warning letter at most?
      A mom and pop business that maybe cut some corners selling $30 orchids?
      When guys that steal trillions of Dollars in MBS fraud that scream RICO action laugh all the way to the bank?
      Jon C, Angelo M, Lloyd B get a small fine or nothing at all?
      When Obama came right out in a 2009 White House summit with finance titans, to tell them that only he was standing “between you and the pitchforks”
      The Fast and Furious investigation gets stone walled?
      When the government routinely expends huge amounts of time and money on prosecuting defenseless citizens for vague violations of the thousands of sections of the criminal code, none of us are safe.
      Except for the Oligarchs, they are “Untouchable”.
      That is the point.

    • BigTom October 1, 2012, 7:47 pm

      JJ – I recall within the last year or so some organic egg farm or organic something in california was busted for not following some letter of some law. Yet chinese fish raised in sewer ponds abroad is allowed to be sold in americas super markets. Also recall some lone day trader working out of his house, also in california, was busted for insider trading. What a joke, and it was seriously reported by MSM as a war on illegal financial activity! And we all know about the real perps going free on insider trading. Heck, I have even read of instances of SEC officials involved in insider trading laughing about it over expensive lunches on wall street. And were not members of congress until just recently exempt from insider trading laws? Also in california I believe they are making it illegal for the poor ‘ol ‘main street’ guy to pan for gold, while those familiar well know how ‘da boyz’ blatantly manipulate the PM market in front of us all while the CFTC/SEC et al do nothing. Yep, and the TSA….well I could go on but you know the point. It is all about stepping on middle america…

  • Jill October 1, 2012, 4:35 am

    There must be some way to eliminate these unneeded & parasitic big banks. To just let them all go bankrupt? Can anyone think of a way that would work out okay for non-bankers?

    E.g. maybe we could all keep our money in our mattresses, or in local credit unions, which would then lend money to businesses. There has got to be some way out of this Central-banks-give-all-our-money-to-big-banks-which-then-do-not-lend-it-out-over & over–again hamster wheel. No one except the big bankers is getting anything from this. Why are we putting up with it?

    Since most folks here seem to be libertarian, I can only imagine that, if this causes governments to collapse, that folks here would not consider this a problem.

    • John Jay October 1, 2012, 6:13 am

      Jill,
      There are a lot of ways to get rid of the TBTF banks.
      None of them have any chance of ever happening, the banks own the Federal government.
      They break the laws with impunity everyday.
      And that is that.
      The latest evidence of who the Feds think is worthy of criminal prosecution is as follows.
      I saw a segment on TV about a sweet little couple in their early 70s that had a small home based mail order flower business.
      One of their stock items was orchids from Peru or someplace. Some import paperwork was not perfect and wham!
      Four truckloads of Feds in riot gear stormed the house of the little old man and lady and dragged him off to jail on an “Endangered Species Act” violation over the orchids he sold.
      The indictment stated he was selling the illegal orchids “for exorbitant prices to high end buyers.”
      He was selling them for $30!
      The orchids were not poached from the forest, they were grown in a greenhouse.
      No judge threw this out of court, this nice old man mortgaged his house for 100k to pay legal fees and had to plead out to a 17 month prison sentence!
      Nice, huh!
      I did not vet this story, but it rings true to me.
      As I told someone on this forum, do not challenge or provoke the authorities, due process and the rule of law are history now.
      We are all seen as criminals now.
      And that is that.

      Rick,
      I have changed my mind about Social Securities solvency after looking at the numbers some more.
      You were right, it looks terrible, my mistake.
      It seems thanks to ZIRP, the low paying jobs, the falling labor force participation rate, the suicidal payroll tax cut, etc., etc. the end is near.
      The law that pertains to SS and SSDI seems to mandate that once the surplus for either fund is exhausted benefit cuts of 25% for SS, and 21% for SSDI are to take place.
      The SSDI fund is expected to be exhausted as soon as 2016 or earlier. That’s only 3 years away.
      ZIRP and the other factors are going to implode all of the retirement plans, not just SS and SSDI.
      I will be a cynic and argue that is exactly what TPTB want to happen.
      If there is anyway out of all this mess, I can’t see it.
      Que sera, sera!

  • BigTom October 1, 2012, 1:19 am

    All this money printing. digital entries on ledgers to clear out the mega holders book value debt that is in fact much nearer to worthless than it is marked to fantasy (dreambook valuation). Print here, print there, hell, just print everywhere. It seems hyperinflation would be the obvious choice but the $$ are not getting out into circulation it seems, but rather log jamned on book entry in the digital world. This appears to be leading to a slow down of the actual velocity of money on main street as you say, Rick. I personally know of real estate deals that will not move simply because qualified people are not able to get a loan. Heck the modern world began on credit with the Florentine bankers in 15th century Italy. Now, in this ever increasing mega-credit world, a choke down of available credit =’s a slow collapse of commerce…..And the European drama? It seems to me the minute they do turn off the money spigot to the banks the whole thing collapses. The people can’t pay and the bankers are stuck owing each other the money from complex loan structures and governments collapse when the money circle jerk stops moving ’round n’ ’round and on an on an on ad nauseum. It’s everywhere…..Sinclair seems to be right. ‘Quantative easing to infinity’ or everything just vanishes….sheesh, think I’ll just go tip a few and watch the game tonight!

    • RickJ October 1, 2012, 6:56 pm

      Velocity of money will pick up a bit as people buy things instead of saving or investing. Some people understand that return of capital is important.
      But of course the majority of people do not have any free cash, just debt and declining ability to borrow. This should not be a surprise as elimination of Glass Steagel meant that Banks no longer need Americans to do well in order for the banks to do well. The banks since the late 90s could simply trade their way to prosperity, make $ exporting American industry to foreign lands and invent toxic derivatives. Hold both sides of a derivative transaction, decide in advance which will be the loser side; sell it, cash in the winner side of the bet, buy back the loser side at pennies, then get the guv to buy it back. Brilliant. Almost plausibly legal unless fraud can be proven in court, but hey wait, maybe a legal settlement and then the problem is gone with no guilt.
      Sound Familiar?
      So the guv is going to buy up mortgage backs as part of QE3……….Hmmmm.

      &&&&&&

      Wall Street would appear to be focused on QE4 and QE5, Rick, having already worried aloud that the planned $40B worth of mortgage ‘purchases’ per month won’t be enough. RA