It’s Taps for Europe’s ‘Last Honest Men’

Mario Draghi, feather merchant to northern Europe, is once again plying his dubious trade, this time with a slick sales pitch designed to persuade Germany that he can “save” Europe with a financial scheme that makes alchemy look respectable. The challenge he faces is more ambitious than merely putting another dab of lipstick on the PIIGS.  Rather, it is like asking the Germans to press their noses to a sardine’s armpit and have them come away reassured they’ve smelled fine perfume.  In Berlin to deliver a tightly scripted speech that was intended to give Germany’s parliament political cover for doing the wrong thing, Draghi told members he was “here to listen to your views on the ECB, on the euro-area economy and on the longer vision for Europe.” Translation: “This is a stickup. Give me the money now and don’t try anything foolish, because I am desperate.”  True enough.  But will German bankers simply roll over?  In all probability yes, given Merkel’s damn-the-torpedoes determination to do what every politician must these days in order to survive – i.e., kick the can down the road for as long as possible.

If and when they run up the white flag, the bankers will be surrendering more than just German treasure. For in the by-now terminally ethereal world of global finance, they are the last honest men, steeped in the agonizing lessons of the Weimar hyperinflation of 1921-23.  Now they are being asked to sanction a deal that would give Draghi the ability to create unlimited sums of digital money so that the central bank can buy the bonds of countries no longer able to pay even the interest on those bonds.  Such measures will of course have no impact on the EU’s moribund economy, especially with Germany’s unexpectedly steep slowdown threatening to push all of Europe into a death spiral. This new crisis, manifestly unthinkable to economists just six months ago, will make it even harder for the German people to allow Merkel to issue Draghi a blank check. But it must and will be done, since there are no economic solutions at this point, only politically expedient ones.

‘Bernankean’ Aspirations

Merkel’s most reliable ally in bringing Germany’s recalcitrant, quaintly old-school bankers to heel is a news media that has sunk to the level of shameless complicity in propagating a quack Theory of Quantitative Easing that is absurd on its face and easily falsified.  Here’s how the Wall Street Journal attempted to tiptoe past the implication that Draghi is seeking nothing less than Bernankean powers to gin up unlimited sums of debt-based money: “Unlike a previous limited plan that failed to stem the crisis, the ECB can now undertake open-ended purchases.”  How very nice for the ECB.  But we won’t hold our breath waiting for the Journal’s op-ed page to explain what the euphemism “open-ended” actually means. Nor do we expect any journalist to challenge Draghi’s meaningless promise to “remain permanently alert to risks to price stability.”  If enabling the printing of a trillion more euros is compatible with price stability, then issuing wampum as legal tender is the path back to global prosperity.

Most challenging of all for Draghi will be surmounting the legal hurdle of an EU constitution that clearly and explicitly forbids the purchase of sovereign debt by the ECB. Although Draghi insists that his bond program won’t violate ECB rules against financing governments, there is no legally getting around the fact that it will.  Assuming Europe follows America’s promiscuous example when it comes time to expediently misinterpret the ECB’s charter, what hope is there that mere laws will ultimately stand in the way of economically suicidal folly?

***

[Click here for a free trial subscription to Rick’s Picks that includes access to a 24/7 chat room and the recently launched ‘Harry’s Place’.]

  • Marc Authier October 27, 2012, 9:01 pm

    Europe today is just a glamorized and glossy version of the ex USSR. The EU will finish the same way as the ex USSR and it will be indeed a very good thing. I hate federalists (US and Canadian federalists included). They are dumb, corrupt and parasitic. Brussels is a lot like Washington DC or Ottawa. Both are cancers that deserve to be downsized dramatically or even wiped out from our lives. Federal governments are cancers.

    &&&&&&

    Jack Wheeler, who climbed the Matterhorn at 14 and advised Reagan at 16, once posed the question, “Do you know who the President of Switzerland is?” Of course not. His point was that that’s the way a good central government should work: in the background, so quietly and with such little impact on shaping the news that few outside of the country would even recognize the name of its top political leader.

    Barack who? Would that it were so. RA

  • John Jay October 27, 2012, 6:09 pm

    Funny comment from ZH that perfectly sums up the US Corporate priorities vs Russian power plays.
    This is regarding the BP/Rosneft deal.

    Comment by: malikai

    “So this deal with Rosneft will make it worth ~$50billion..
    Facebook is valued at ~$47billion..
    Rosneft will be producing 4Mbbl/day of crude.
    Facebook produces what?”

    Now that is a very good question, isn’t it?
    Theatre of the Absurd?
    Maybe.
    Looks like a good plot for a “South Park” episode to me!
    Are you out there, Matt and Trey?

    • Rick Ackerman October 28, 2012, 3:30 am

      It shames America that a company like Facebook, which produces absolutely nothing and adds little to the economy save advertising revenues, has captured the fancy of Wall Street’s hubris-mongers. These days, an entrepreneur or investor would have to be crazy to sink time or money into a company that troubles itself to actually make stuff.

    • mario cavolo October 28, 2012, 7:50 am

      Ditto China central govt planning, quietly getting the job done. While on the surface, the U.S. Sino relations drama continues with the drama of the best TV soap operas, and the MSM and Washington feed the frenzy from the political, and not to minimize China’s serious issues, modern China’s series of 5 year plans are a clear, steady picture that is quietly and steadily getting the job done, to say the least. Ultimately, their policies, strategies and actions are self-serving, however I suppose that’s true for just about every country.

  • BigTom October 27, 2012, 12:37 am

    As for Judge Roberts, I think his decision was political, not constitutional, though those scholars seemed to have well found the authority here to do such a thing. Dismantling Obama care by the courts would dump the onus onto the conservative ‘ethos’ – thus the dark hearted conservative republicans, as portrayed by MSM, would be uncaring ‘ogres’ for working class Americans. All this just prior to national elections. That I believe would provide never ending fodder for MSM et. al. Nope, I believed he dumped it back into the laps of Congressional worthless do nothings. Your never ending congressional lack of spinal fortitude caved as usual and made this mess then dumped it on me to take your hit. Now here it is back in your face. You fix it, get it right and face the music yourselves….You yellow belly ______!(insert word/words of your choice here)

  • BigTom October 27, 2012, 12:14 am

    LOL – Rick – quick and to the point as always. great job today! “Most challenging of all for Draghi will be surmounting the legal hurdle of an EU constitution that clearly and explicitly forbids the purchase of sovereign debt by the ECB.” Hell, a constitution is a living, breathing document well flexible in the modern world. With the right personage, which always seem to politically materialize when needed in todays world, one can change it to be anything one wants it to be. See, ‘America,’ though putting on a splendid show of upholding somewhat in the main, the flanks are folding.

  • Chris T. October 27, 2012, 12:10 am

    “As much as I hate what Roberts did in regard to Obama Care, he was correct because all activity of a federal corporate person under the 14th amendment is subject to Article I, sec. 8, cls. 1 excise taxation. That authority is against the states, and federal legislative creations.”

    As far as I know, Roberts agreed that if the “fines” were not a tax, then the system would be unconstitutional. But because he read them as a tax, he held them as constitutional under the fed. govt’s right to tax in general.

    This despite the fact, that the administration, congress, and everyone went to great lengths to point out that this is not a tax. So, in effect, what Roberts did was look for the the one way that permitted him to uphold this law no matter how tenuous.

    It is exactly that which is the mark of judicial activism, something on principle supposedly anathema to people like Roberts. It is not their job to parse words, to ultimately find the one meaning that will let them uphold, when many other readings would not permit to do so.

    As for the incorporation doctrine, its broad scope viz fed. v. state is not uncontroversial. Even if that is the correct interpretation, the ratification itself is highly questionable, and the Amendment may actually not be constitutional for lack of proper ratification process.

    But such details don’t matter, the ends always justifies the means.

    Pat Buchanan has probably provided the best explanation as to why Roberts ruled as he did: for posterity, meaning his own, The Roberts Court!

    &&&&&&

    Justice Roberts may have sullied his reputation for all time if Obamacare — The Worst Bill Ever, as the WSJ has aptly described it — survives. No one could believe Roberts capable of taking a bribe, of course, but I keep thinking nonetheless of the denouement of the “The Other Side of Midnight,” a terrific film adapted from Sidney Shelton’s novel. In the story, a Greek billionaire has hired the most celebrated lawyer in Europe, one Napoleon Hortus, to defend the wife who had cuckolded him against charges of first-degree murder. But the lawyer, evidently paid an enormous sum by the billionaire to take a dive by mis-advising the wife, tricks her and her lover into pleading guilty without explaining to them that such a plea carried a mandatory death sentence. If a lawyer with a stellar reputation earned over the course of a lifetime — a man christened “Napoleon,” no less — could be bought off, if only in fiction, then who knows? RA

  • John Jay October 26, 2012, 11:03 pm

    Rick,
    As far as the CHF and the DM are concerned, I guess the US Dollar is living proof that bad money does indeed drive good money out of circulation!
    Cancel that “Mythbusters” episode!

  • fallingman October 26, 2012, 6:43 pm

    Brilliant article…so well written.

    But dude, you’re scarin’ the hell out of me with that picture of Goldman ghoul, Mario Draghi, And it isn’t even Halloween.

    • Rick Ackerman October 26, 2012, 7:57 pm

      Thanks for the kind words, Fallingman. Concerning Draghi, my choice of pictures was editorially unkind; the man actually has a nice smile.

    • Buster October 26, 2012, 8:22 pm

      Yes, it’s got me half believing in all this ‘retillean’ stuff I’ve heard of. Very scary!

  • nonplused October 26, 2012, 5:13 pm

    What was it called again? The Mark? There is more than one way out of this for Germany. For Greece, no.

    I also take exception to calling the purchases by the ECB of Greek or Spanish bonds the creation of “debt based currency”. It’s only debt based currency if the bonds have some reasonable expectation of repayment or future value in real terms. Since they don’t, this is “Ponzi based currency”.

    This is truly getting ugly. I can’t believe we are far now from the complete collapse of the Euro and everyone must be aware of that. I mean, everyone knows the Greeks will not ever repay their bonds. They can’t. Not even after a hyperinflation. Probably not the Spanish either. In fact, I don’t think there is one western country that has any hope of doing so. The debt must always increase

    I guess it’s too early to think about such things, but what happens if the Euro does collapse? I can’t see how governments could continue to function, or if they did the benefits and wages they pay out would be worthless in real terms. What would become of the demonstrations in Greece then? Those rioters aren’t of the mindset to believe their expectations are unreasonable now, so why would they later? And a quick return to the Drachma wouldn’t fool anyone. It would immediately begin trading with a value of zero. The political implications are very uncertain.

    It’s good to remind ourselves now and again that the Euro is only just over a decade old. Easy come, easy go. It’s about as permanent and enduring as a marriage contract (i.e. permanent and forever and unchangeable and holy except that both parties can sever the contract on 1 year’s notice with effective severance taking place immediately.)

    I suppose the US dollar could be used to temporarily fill the void in European commerce. Hmmm. Temporarily. Like in Zimbabwe.

    I think I’ll go watch “Eyes Wide Shut” again. (NWO joke. Only incompetence and the deeply rooted human belief that there is a way to get something for nothing if you think about it hard enough could produce such a calamity as we are seeing, so I don’t believe it could be a conspiracy.)

    • John Jay October 26, 2012, 5:58 pm

      nonplussed,

      It is not only Greece that will never repay her loans.
      For the most part, no one on the planet will.
      Not Uncle Sam, not the Student Loan kids, not the debt fueled mega corporations.
      Nor will all the pension obligations payoff, pensions already vastly underfunded even with magic 8% returns used to mask insolvency.
      Not the Municipal Bonds that have reached uber Ponzi status in Poway California USD.
      They borrowed 105 million in Capital Appreciation Bonds to be paid back as 1 billion 35 to 40 years down the can kicking road.
      The Treasury bonds that the Social Security surplus is invested in are fiction, as are all the FDIC insured savings accounts, that money is god knows where.
      But is not in the vault at the bank.
      The numbers are too big, which is why ZIRP was invented, to hold the system together until they can figure a way to screw us once and for all.
      There is probably a tipping point to be reached when enough Americans have zero savings, are on the dole,
      etc. that will enable TPTB to confiscate the savings/investments of the frugal few without consequence.
      But for now, the Dollar, sad as it is, is still sought out in some countries. Argentina comes to mind, as their currency is even worse than ours, and their government even more repressive than ours.
      It is all relative for now.
      Crazy rules!

    • Rick Ackerman October 26, 2012, 7:49 pm

      ‘Ponzi’ comes pretty close to describing what’s going on, I agree, although Ponzi pigeons are typically enticed with promises of getting dollars back for dimes.

      I have written here before about why Germany’s return to the D-mark is most unlikely. In short, being priced in a hard currency would kill their exports. The last thing Germany wants is to be perceived by investors as the only truly safe haven for money. Concerning Switzerland, which stuck with a currency that has always been ‘hard,’ the reason their export economy hasn’t collapsed is that, uncharacteristically, they took heroic steps to trash the Swiss franc.

  • tom paine October 26, 2012, 3:30 pm

    Rick,

    Are you suggesting that a “technocrat” doesn’t know what he is doing? Come on! TECHNO surely means they have the technology. The can rebuild the economy, make it faster, stronger. Maybe we can call Draghi the Six Trillion Euro Man? Or is six trillion too little? Surely we could get someone like Paul Krugman to make that argument for us.

  • gary leibowitz October 26, 2012, 3:11 pm

    FYI, my market bets for last 12 months:

    From last December till summer – used ETF 3x SP500 (SPXL). Pulled out in summer. Now back in. I also love short/fast action. Can’t get away from these bets. If 1396 on SPX holds in next few days I will also make a Nov 1450 SPX Call bet. My mad money.

    I use automatic technical rules to exit. If hit I am out of the market. If convinced we are back in a bear I will reverse my bet. For now expecting another leg up. All domestic numbers are pointing to a rise from the EU crisis of 3 months ago, that will gain steam.

    • Rick Ackerman October 26, 2012, 4:28 pm

      Good enough, Gary, but if any of these trades work, you’ll be the first person I’ve met in 40 years of option trading to have consistently made money on directional plays using call options. This is true in spades for those playing 2x and 3x vehicles, since these sucker bets were created by thieves (I was an options market maker for 12 years) for the explicit purpose of selling option premium to rubes dumb enough to believe they can beat the house. If you do buy those Nov 1450s, or any other derivative of the SPX, I hope you’ll let us know the price(s) you paid and your exit strategy.

      To repeat: As a former professional option trader with 40 years of experience, I am extremely skeptical of your claim to have made money with a buy-and-hold, long-premium bet on direction. To be frank, I don’t believe it’s possible. Your odds of making a good living betting on horses are better.

    • gary leibowitz October 26, 2012, 5:38 pm

      Directional plays during directional market trends doen’t work? I expect to eventually reverse that bet with 3X puts. On the other hand my play money is for fast action, expecting a big gain or total loss, using small bets.

      My best ever action was during a nasty bear drop. I started out with 2K, got real lucky and timed the 5 wave moves, with only 5 bets, 3 puts and 2 calls. Ended up with 170K. I rolled over my winnings. I will say that my emotional bearish obstinacy gradually lost all that money back into the system.

      I know the odds very well. For me it is an emotional high, with no downside. I go in expecting a total loss.

      The ETF’s started with 200K. Since I believed (and still do) that we will see a blow off top before it ends I have struck to my plan for the last 10 months. I set up strict rules that take my emotional expectations out of the game if wrong. Nothing is infaliable. I know the risks. Buffett made his fortune this way. He did not buy and hold when he knew that a major trend change was happening. He was ridiculed for geting out early with a huge cash reserve.

      &&&&&&

      Fine, although I don’t believe the above account of your experience and am guessing you have ‘forgotten’ some losing trades.

      And now, at least as regards you, no more posts that are unrelated to today’s commentary, okay? RA

  • Chris t. October 26, 2012, 10:00 am

    e.no doubt that it will play out as you sketch it. after all the german BVerfG has kowtowed a bunch of times already, just like Roberts did with obamacare. the eco will do same, and all the pols., certainly including “ex”-commie Angela, will do anything to save their one world pre-run e.u never mind the damage.

    • Rick Ackerman October 26, 2012, 4:18 pm

      Speaking of Roberts, I received an interesting note from Steven Fair that in the eyes of some might exonerate the Chief Justice from charges of bias or ignorance in his judicial ratification of Obamacare. Regulars in this forum will remember Steve as, informally, our Constitutionalist. He writes as follows:

      “As much as I hate what Roberts did in regard to Obama Care, he was correct because all activity of a federal corporate person under the 14th amendment is subject to Article I, sec. 8, cls. 1 excise taxation. That authority is against the states, and federal legislative creations.”