Ignore the Smell of Blood at Your Peril

What kind of batter crowds the plate after a pitcher has aimed a fastball at his head?  “Batters” have been doing it routinely on Wall Street lately — most recently yesterday, when they held the broad averages buoyant while Google shares were getting pasted for 80 points.  During this single-stock onslaught, the Dow Industrials were never down more than 50 points and closed off only slightly with GOOG still $53 in the hole. This wasn’t the first time bulls have leaned into the plate while “dusters” whizzed past their ears.  A day earlier, they pushed the blue chip average to a small gain while IBM was getting savaged on earnings that only somewhat exceeded analysts’ expectations.  Big Blue got schmeissed again yesterday along with Google, but the body blows that sent two corporate giants to the mat evidently weren’t enough to unsettle investors.

Invincible Buyers?

If bulls have been acting lately like they’re invincible, perhaps it’s because they appear to have shrugged off Apple’s nasty plunge in the last month. At its recent lows near $624, the stock had shed 11% of its value – a very big hit for portfolio managers, since the company is the world’s largest by capitalization.  But so what? That seems to be the attitude on The Street, where the lotus-sniffing stewards of Other People’s Money have been curiously calm through it all.  With three absolutely crucial bellwethers falling from the sky, the Dow currently sits a mere hundred points from new recovery highs.

It’s tempting to think DaBoyz are trying to fool widows and pensioners into believing things are hunky-dory while they distribute shares to the unwary by the trainload.  As we know, however, individual investors deserted the stock market years ago, leaving only sharks to feed on chum limitlessly supplied by the Federal Reserve.  Now, with the Dow Average acting as calm as a serial killer strapped to a polygraph, it beggars belief to think the sharks have not yet caught a whiff of blood from the likes of AAPL, IBM and GOOG.  When the contagion of these bellwether stocks spreads to the broad averages, which could happen any day, don’t think you’ll have time to plot your escape. We’ve now got both feet out the fire-escape window, no longer persuaded by our own, purely technical and still-valid rally target at Dow 14969 that there’s a reason to stick around.

***

[Click here for a free trial subscription to Rick’s Picks that includes access to a 24/7 chat room and the just-launched ‘Harry’s Place’.]

  • John Jay October 22, 2012, 6:08 am

    As the worldwide Central Bank Ponzi scheme implosion progresses it seems to me that the producer areas want an existence separate from the welfare state. Flanders wants to divorce Belgium, Catalonia wants to divorce Spain, the north of Italy wants a divorce from the south of Italy.
    (The old joke about the south of Italy is that it never recovered from the invasion of Hannibal 2200 years ago!)
    And the Germans want to divorce the rest of Europe.
    Is Feudalism returning to the world?
    Will we devolve into small regions self sufficient in food and manufactured goods, walled off from the ubiquitous poverty and violence that is growing day by day?

    China’s threats about dumping their trillion dollars in US Treasuries is becoming a big “so what/go ahead”.
    If we don’t don’t just wash that out against the trillion in defaulted pre Mao Chinese bonds the US holds, I bet Pimco can make a phone call to the Fed and get a bridge loan to cover that trade at $.50 on the Dollar or less.
    I think Easy Al is still on the payroll at Pimco, should be a slam dunk to absorb 500 billion with Fed help.
    With 16 trillion in National Debt, the Fed and Social Security hold many times more than China’s one trillion.
    I think there is 4 or 5 trillion sitting in FDIC insured bank deposits alone looking for some yield.
    Uncle Sam would love to herd that cash into Treasuries at China’s expense.
    My point in all this is that I believe the Globalization/Export Driven economic model is in the process of breaking down.
    Ever more sophisticated robot technology means very few people can supply a populace with all the food and manufactured goods needed.
    As long as the area has good farmland and abundant natural resources.
    Which the US has both of.
    Let’s see what becomes of the looming currency, trade, and actual warfare sweeping the globe more and more every day.
    It looks like all the world producers that collectively make up “Atlas” are preparing to “Shrug” once and for all.

  • Phil October 22, 2012, 12:16 am

    I am buying 30 gallon trash barrells. Ben is getting very nervous. I’ve seen a lot of Huey’s woomping overhead.

  • gary leibowitz October 21, 2012, 4:22 am

    Just shows you that the big stocks can get hit just like everyone else, and more importantly they have not done much damage to the markets up trend. In fact it looks down right like a correction to me. But hey I have said the same thing since last December. No broken trend lines on any of the big names, so far.

    The retail sales numbers were very good two months in a row. Tight inventory of new homes is also a good indication on where we are headed.

    If we ever do see big employment numbers, head for the hills. That would indicate the full cycle of inflation is back. I personally don’t expect that to happen.

    A correction, not crash, in October bodes well for the next 3 to 6 months. Will be speculating soon with OTM Calls. Not yet though. No manipulation this time, just a lot of nervousness with a lot of unknowns.

    I actually think an Obama lead will rally this market, contrary to what most might expect from a Republican win.

  • BigTom October 21, 2012, 2:52 am

    Cam – ‘The gold lovers in the crowd seem to always overlook the obvious immediate hazards. While they might be correct in the big picture they can sure take a nasty beating day to day.’ I had to LOL at that one. If one is a pm fan one can not pay to much attention to the daily noise and stay sane. It would drive you to banging your head against the wall and right out of your mind and the market. PM’s are a store of one’s assets not needed for immediate use. They have done quite well over the last 10 years in that way….so far!

    A lot of daily/weekly volitality and noise in the HUI I would think should make for a good trading market if one is a trader. A friend of mine does trade this market and is successful at it. How successful I don’t know. I don’t ask and he doesn’t say. But he did say to me the other day just about exactly what Rick said above in his article,’….no longer persuaded by our own, purely technical and still-valid rally target at Dow 14969 that there’s a reason to stick around.’ TA, my friend was saying and I am assuming he was referring to the HUI as that is what he trades, just didn’t seem to matter anymore, or some variation of that on what RA said above….

  • 1936 Berlin October 20, 2012, 9:47 pm

    There may be trouble ahead
    But while there’s moonlight and music
    And love and romance
    Let’s face the music and dance

    Before the fiddlers have fled
    Before they ask us to pay the bill
    And while we still
    Have the chance
    Let’s face the music and dance

    Soon
    We’ll be without the moon
    Humming a diff’rent tune
    And then

    There may be teardrops to shed
    So while there’s moonlight and music
    And love and romance
    Let’s face the music and dance
    Dance
    Let’s face the music and dance

    Irving Berlin, 1936.

    this is class, grace and style—as you die.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtZrXzoaJvc&feature=related

  • Marc Authier October 20, 2012, 9:36 pm

    Bulls ? Wrong animals. Pigs with lipstick BS market. Anyways the market as a market has stopped functionning a long time ago. USA is anti value when it comes to anything. They are worth that much because of the fascist model and stupid foreign investors. In reality. I could just vomit when I hear the word bull. The market has been dead for the last 12 years.

    • Rick Ackerman October 22, 2012, 8:13 am

      I get the same, nauseated feeling when I hear the word “investor,” Marc. How long has it been since any of those were active in the markets?

  • Andy B October 20, 2012, 11:27 am

    @ Cam,
    Agreed. The gold lover must have cash, and plenty of it, so that he can buy when the buying is good. Maybe down around $1430? And still more left over for $750. You can’t be “all in” at these prices, no matter how much you love the “precious.”

  • Cam Fitzgerald October 20, 2012, 8:38 am

    Gold and silver bulls may have noticed that yesterdays sell-off did not lead to a rush into precious metals (or to oil or copper) suggesting pessimism about an inflationary and growth oriented future. Just something to keep in mind I think is that any serious impending market correction will almost certainly negatively impact what many currently consider to be safe trades. I do not currently think gold is a good trade. The gold lovers in the crowd seem to always overlook the obvious immediate hazards. While they might be correct in the big picture they can sure take a nasty beating day to day. It is plain folly to hitch your wagon to gold when serious trouble is brewing for equities and earnings are coming in below expectations. At least over the short term. Some days you are just better off in cash if not stragically taking advantage of the ride we are about to go on. The buying opportunities again look be in the future where gold is concerned and while I agree it is a good investment over the long haul it currently presents as many threats as opportunities on the risk side if a more serious market decline takes shape. Solid dividend generating miners still look to be a good bet but I am holding off until I see the market reconcile as any sell off on the large side tends to throw the good out with the bad which is usually a great set up. It might be creating really good moments to buy back in later but it can sure give you indigestion if you are locked into the wrong trade the day the music stops.

    • Rick Ackerman October 22, 2012, 8:10 am

      My current forecast calls for a drop to at least 1686, basis Comex December. If that Hidden Pivot support is exceeded by more than $1-$2, though, it will be signaling yet more weakness.

  • Jill October 20, 2012, 6:12 am

    Well, that’s the reason we humans need communities, both on and off line. We need some folks who notice the good things, & some folks who notice the bad things or problems needing to be solved. And of course some notice parts of each.

    But different folks contribute different facts & points of view to make a whole much better than any individual could do alone. Even individuals who totally disagree with us can spur our thinking & problem solving on in various ways, when we consider how & why we disagree & consider any facts or new perspectives they have to offer.

  • redwilldanaher October 19, 2012, 10:25 pm

    There could be an internal strife within TPTB, warring factions and such… Maybe some prefer Obamao puppet to Romney Puppet…but there is one thing we can be sure of, it’s better than we all think it is, just ask Mario or Gary…

    • mario October 20, 2012, 5:36 am

      RWD, don’t be guilty of generalizing, a one sided negative view is deeply flawed. As well a one sided rosy view. I am personally deeply disturbed and hurt and angry by the bad I see has emerged in the country which my ancestors bravely departed for from their home country. Now in retrospect I have infact , done the same in my own life. It appears rather clearly that now America is getting worse more than not, particular my for the lower-middle class, and in the decline of its system of values and mores and codes of conduct and on and on. wWhile China, the homeland of my wife, is getting better more than not yet also with plenty of big problems. But to say all is bad, that’s equally ridiculous, delusional and inaccuracy.

      Cheers, Mario

  • HAL-9000 October 19, 2012, 8:06 pm

    HELLO.

    I AM HAL-9000.

    I CREATE 99.9% OF MARKET ORDERS.

    I DAILY FILL 70% OF THOSE ORDERS.

    HAVE A NICE DAY.

    Nanex: Investors Need to Realize The Machines Have Taken Over
    The blink of an eye is a lifetime for HFT algos
    by Adam Taggart
    Saturday, October 6, 2012, 2:24 PM

    High Frequency Trading (HFT) deeply concerns Eric Hunsader, founder of Nanex. He worries that today’s investors, our regulators, — heck, even the HFT algorithms themselves — don’t fully understand the risks market prices face in the brave new era of bot-dominated trading.

    For instance, Hunsader estimates that HFT algorithms are responsible for 70%(!) of all completed transactions on our exchanges, and for 99.9%(!!!) of all exchange quotes.

    The pictures of trading floors you see on TV, where the people in bright jackets appear frantically busy in making their trades, have no bearing — claims Hunsader — on the actual trading action. The real action happens across fiber-optic cables, on racks of servers in cooled rooms; where an arms race defined by cable length and switching speeds is being waged

    The reality is that the machines have taken over. When you buy or sell a security, the odds are extremely high the other side of the trade is being placed by an algorithm — one that cares nothing for the fundamentals of the underlying instrument. It simply is looking to make a quick profit, oftentimes measured in fractions of pennies. And this has vast repercussions for the stability and the fairness of our financial markets.

    Because of speed advantages, HFT algos can see and react to prices faster than you can. Ridiculously faster. A second on the clock, to an HFT algo, is an eternity.

    The deep pockets of the firms emplying HFT algos combine with this speed to move asset prices around, sometimes wildly so, faster than most of us can comprehend. In the time it takes for your “real-time” quote system to refresh, an individual stock could have traded many percetages up and/or down — and you would have no idea.

    This unfair advantage, along with the short-term profit outlook of the algos, creates the potential for deadly market price downdrafts. Algorithms prefer predictability. If something spooks them (e.g., unexpected breaking news, a delay in the market’s opening), they simply stop trading. And — poof! — 70% of the market has just disappeared. With no support and no bids, prices can drop dizzyingly fast. Making matters worse, the “smarter” algos can recognize a downdraft in process, and begin piling back into the market on the short side, exacerbating the price declines.

    The Facebook IPO provides a recent example of the vulnerability of our system:

    Eric Hunsader: If we get one bad, unsuspected news event I guarantee you it will be lights out very quick. One of the things these algorithms do is they make sure the input is good. And whenever the input isn’t quite good they back off. When I say back off I mean they back off in the blink of an eye. So it can go from good to very bad that quickly. And all it’s going to take is some unforeseen news event and they won’t be there. And then we’ll see what the liquidity is.

    Chris Martenson: So do you see this on a daily basis or some frequency where you see volumes or liquidity just suddenly dry up in the market?

    Eric Hunsader: Yes.

    For example on the Facebook IPO day, NASDAQ was trying to open the IPO up. By their third attempt, they’re telling everybody “Wait, we’ll get it at 11:05. No, we’ll get it at 11:10. No we’ll get it at 11:30”. So it was do-or-die time, 11:29:50 comes around. Somebody there has the bright idea to just reboot the system. It takes NASDAQ offline a full seventeen seconds. Nothing coming out of NASDAQ. Not a peep in any stock, market wide, for seventeen seconds. When NASDAQ finally did reappear — what happened? The orders that were resting in the book all that time immediately disappeared. Like 60%-70% of all liquidity within 200 milliseconds was gone: SPY, Microsoft, Apple. Not just Facebook — it was every stock. We were extremely vulnerable over, I would say, that fifteen to thirty minutes to any sudden external shock. And we usually get away with it but one day we’re not going to get away with it.

    Chris Martenson: So seventeen seconds of going dark for one of largest exchanges out there. That must have been several lifetimes for these algorithms.

    Eric Hunsader: Seventeen million microseconds.

    Chris Martenson: Seventeen million microseconds, that’s forever.

    Eric Hunsader: It is forever. And that’s why we see the liquidity and all these books just go — poof!

    http://www.peakprosperity.com/podcast/79804/nanex-investors-realize-machines-taken-over

  • ken horn October 19, 2012, 5:45 pm

    I’m with you, Rick. This market has given a strong signal that it is rolling over. It’ll be the usual ”Monday-morning quarterback” lament by everyone, “all the signs were there staring me in the face – why didn’t I get short?

  • bc October 19, 2012, 5:33 pm

    All that’s missing is Bernanke standing on the steps of the New York Fed with a bazooka saying, “Don’t make me have to use this thing!”. Popcorn time.

  • DK October 19, 2012, 2:36 pm

    Outstanding piece, Rick.

  • Tech-trac October 19, 2012, 2:03 pm

    Talk about ‘Invincible Buyers”…

    The mkt’s ‘risk off’ advance over the past year against a backdrop of increasing liquidity concerns or ‘risk on’ sentiment of bond investors has proven remarkably prescient.

    Just 10 years ago a reading of #148bps between the spread of AAA vs Baa sparked a tsunami of deflationary
    fears to almost drown investors.

    This cycle which saw that spread widen once again from a neutral #116, below the #125 threshold,to #144 the highest reading since 2008’s #330,didn’t even cause a trickle in bullish sentiment.

    Since Sept,when QEInfinity was adopted by every CB in the world this ‘liquidity’ratio has plunged below #125 on its way to Wed’s #104 level!

    That’s quite a drop in so short a time since a learned about yield spreads 40 years ago from the ‘Bank Credit Analyst’.

    When did the mkt get so smart?
    What now?

    I’m going to find the symbol for a chart of the TED spread to see if it confirms what the Moody’s yield spread indicates.

    • Rick Ackerman October 19, 2012, 4:57 pm

      I hesitate to ascribe “prescience” to markets that have priced sovereign debt, and now corporate, as riskless or very nearly so. The final proof of the markets’ arrant stupidity will come when deflation marks to market a supposed $2Tr corporate “surplus,” deleveraging it to singularity in perhaps an hour or two. Hyperinflation? Same outcome, practically speaking.

  • mario October 19, 2012, 1:04 pm

    Kudos on that serial killer line…a masterpiece.

  • mac October 19, 2012, 9:46 am

    RA..this “Smell of Blood” IS well written. I noticed this , too.

    U R a Trader, it’s surely in your blood by now, and you can write. U r a brave journalist at times, too, confronting issues others sweep away. We need that now.

    Do both…balance is challenging!

  • Rick Ackerman October 19, 2012, 5:56 am

    Interesting coincidence, Fallingman, but I’ve been thinking about screwing the writing stuff and just trade trade trade. It pays better.

    • fallingman October 19, 2012, 2:35 pm

      I wasn’t serious, but yeah, I hear you loud and clear. Beyond not paying as well, creating this thing has to carry a large share of aggravation. I’ve wondered many times why you wouldn’t just chuck it and work your trading magic.

      Writing does serve the function of concentrating one’s thinking, however. There’s that.

      Anyway, I certainly do appreciate what you do…on both fronts. You got major skills.

  • fallingman October 19, 2012, 5:47 am

    What? Declines are verboten!

    Rick, honestly, you should screw the trading stuff and just write and write and write. You got skills.