Spain’s Agony Is Just the Thing to Buoy Stocks

Index futures were wafting higher Tuesday night, presumably made buoyant by the absence of volume and an apparent dearth of sellers. For DaBoyz who run this nightly carny game, such rallies present an opportunity to induce a short-covering panic — just the thing to distribute shares to widows and pensioners who still don’t suspect stocks may have entered a bear market. At the moment, however, the missing ingredient to produce the wished-for buying panic is some mote of news that might support Wall Street’s cherished mirage of a world in which troubles melt like lemon drops.

Not in Europe, though, and not tonight. Usually, when we see the Mini-S&Ps up more than 10 points late at night, as is currently the case, it means that delusions about Europe getting its financial act together are waxing rather than waning. This evening, however, we are seeing a bizarre inversion of the usual dynamic:  Stocks are rising in Asia not on speculation that Europe has resolved some aspect of its dilemma, but because it can’t, and won’t. Specifically, it is Spain that is getting pummeled today, shunned by the credit markets and worried that it won’t be able to meet payroll if it doesn’t receive a fresh infusion of credit, pronto.

Years of Claptrap

In a financial world not run by crooks, sociopaths and imbeciles, this would be taken for bad news. But the markets are in fact controlled by such types and worse, and so we see shares rallying tonight on hopes that Spain’s increasingly dire plight will call forth yet new and vast sums of stimulus money – and not just for Spain, but for all of Europe. It is an affront to civilization itself that this kind of thinking should rule global markets and therefore, in some fashion, our daily lives. Even though it has been going on for years, it beggars believe to think that anyone even remotely believes such claptrap.  Certainly not the crooks and imbeciles who gamble with Other People’s Money (OPM) as though it were…other people’s money. Not a one of them could possibly expect a happy outcome for Greece, Spain, Italy et al. But when it comes time to place their bets, they toss their chips onto the “pass “ line, sticking to their story.  For its part, the news media, ignorant and complicit, claps with the dim enthusiasm of a trained seal. For seven days’ free access to all of our services, including detailed daily trading recommendations and a 24/7 chat room that draws traders from around the world, click here.

  • Chris T. June 7, 2012, 6:24 pm

    then there is

    ensure vs. insure!

  • roger erickson June 6, 2012, 10:43 pm

    No well-read person can be faulted for being cautious, pessimistic & even cynical through out this entire past decade, or going forward from here.

    These 4 articles directly support Rick’s views, for different but inter-dependent reasons.

    Paul Volcker has Policy Exactly “Banckwards”
    http://mikenormaneconomics.blogspot.com/2012/06/paul-volcker-has-policy-exactly.html

    Eurozone: “the architects of the euro have created a doomsday machine and a gift for speculative capital”
    http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2012/06/eurozone-doomsday-machine.html

    Western Banks ‘Laundering Billions from Colonial Drug Trades’ [& demand no laundering by client-state banks] http://mikenormaneconomics.blogspot.com/2012/06/what-if-bank-managers-did-know-what.html

    Václav Klaus explains European Realities
    http://mikenormaneconomics.blogspot.com/2012/06/vaclav-klaus-explains-european.html

  • Chris T. June 6, 2012, 10:33 pm

    fallingman:

    you might be right about the evaluation of sp. mistakes, but in this case the substance matters, not the form.
    We are not dealing here with long planned, then carefully proof-read essays, where indeed, those sins are excusable.

    But here, its something else, and you should overlook it.
    After hitting send on a blog post, if I do see a stupid error on my part like that, I go red, but tend to excuse other’s for the same reason

    ( 🙂 just kidding with the apostrophes)

    • Chris T. June 6, 2012, 10:34 pm

      INexcusable, duh!

    • fallingman June 6, 2012, 11:46 pm

      Yeah, I get that. You’re exactly correct.

      I don’t like Gary, even when I find myself in agreement with what he’s saying, so I thought I’d needle him. It was pretty unfair. I’ll grant you that. And still, I did it. And it worked. I provoked him. He responded to me when he wouldn’t last year when I was politely asking for a serious, substantive response to my questions. That stuck in my craw. Struck me as cowardly. That’s probably an unfair characterization too. Personally, I thought his response to my post today was kinda bizarre. Jeez, I was just jerking his chain.

      What does that say about me? Who knows? I suppose it’s not exactly a charming trait.

      Okay, I feel bad now. I should be more polite and respectful. Apologies to all. I did degrade the level of dialogue here for petty reasons. My bad.

      By the way, my stuff is loaded with careless typing mistakes and idiosyncratic punctuation, but at least I know the difference between rein and reign and effect and affect. I take a certain pride in using language correctly.

  • Chris T. June 6, 2012, 10:26 pm

    “yields can always go further negative, resulting in a large capital gain.”

    We are already paying ficticous capital gains, with positive nominal, but negative real yields.
    Great for government.

    Even better for them when the nominal yield too is negative.

    But again, with a negative yield, why not just stay in cash?

    It’s issued by (just about the same) entity (the fiat state) and has a higher yield than the bond
    (0 > -x.xx%), even without the cap. gains issue.

    And all those acting here are the types that will denounce gold for “having no yield”.

    What scenario could be extant where neg. yield bonds, converting into “cash” at 0% yield at some point anyway, are still preferrable to cash?

    I could think of only one:

    such an utter mistrust in ANY non-state financial institution (which would be needed to hold that cash, as these people can’t move digits to real paper) and a belief that even too-big-to-fail will not result in a bail out of that institution, that the “money” must be left to the government to hold instead, no matter what the cost.

    But if anyone did believe that scenario, and they STILL did not go into real money, gold, then they are idiots, period.

    • Mark Uzick June 7, 2012, 6:52 am

      Chris, your logic is predicated on the premise that the Treasury bond market isn’t manipulated by the fed – that it responds to solely to market forces that would be driven by your logic alone.

      This is clearly not the case. You can think of treasuries with little or even negative yield as a hedge against the early stages of quantitative easing. In the long run, the capital gains will not offset the destruction of the FRN’s buying power.

      A well hedged portfolio needs, not only precious metals, but stocks, treasuries and cash (Not that I ever take my own advise!, but most people couldn’t sleep if they acted like I do.).

  • bc June 6, 2012, 7:52 pm

    Really. Don’t they know that we can see them? One last try at suckering the guppies to take the financials, the small caps, and the emerging markets off their hands.
    Who are “They”? Why, our too clever by half financial elites. How’s that playbook working out for ya this time fellas? Not so much this time I suspect. Retail investors are pretty long gone now. “They” are trapped like roaches in a motel of their own creation. Great post Rick. Not a rant, the truth IMO.

  • Rich June 6, 2012, 6:44 pm

    Time out from the Campaign 12 June 2012 Primary to thank Rick for yet another prescient call re this perfect storm rip your bear face off rally, as well as ABCD annotations of the Dividend Value Buy List.

    That so many are thinking about fading this rally suggests it may go longer than most lend credence, with SPY Point and Figure targeting an unimaginable 170.

    One of our favourite tools for sighting bottoms and tops is this one:

    http://stockcharts.com/freecharts/gallery.html?s=%24SPX%3A%24VIX

    Meanwhile, as Walter Brennan warned in Meet John Doe: Beware the helots…

  • John Jay June 6, 2012, 6:31 pm

    Benjamin,
    In addition, next year starts the resets for about 12 million HELOC, interest only loans. They will turn into fully amortizing mortgages I believe. Slowly at first in 2013, then more each year that passes. More bailouts for you and I to take care of!

    • Benjamin June 6, 2012, 10:42 pm

      Well, look on the bright side, John Jay… It’s a nice, big number which ensures that even a 10% default will cause some big waves.

  • fallingman June 6, 2012, 5:20 pm

    It’s “rein” and “effects” Gary. You consistently spell words incorrectly.

    It may be unfair, but in my book, carelessness with spelling and language says a lot about a person’s ability to think clearly. In your case, that connection certainly holds.

    By the way, commas don’t cost anything. You might throw in a few.

    Excellent commentary Rick

    • gary leibowitz June 6, 2012, 7:09 pm

      How has the “sky is falling” betting scenario worked out for you these past 3 years? I suspect you bought gold. Doing well but I can assure you not for the reasons you suspect.

      I guess the market must be very stupid since you have determined it’s value is basically worthless.

      I am on record as declaring this year as being in a “sweet spot” for investing. Am also calling for a nasty bout of deflation next year which will cause all the gold fanatics to question their decision. In the end though inflationists win out and a massive hyper-inflation period will cause all assets to rise. I make this absurd argument based on all historic data points going back centuries. Will this time be different? On a risk/reward basis I stay with the odds maker.

    • Buster June 6, 2012, 7:55 pm

      That’s a bit of a low blow, Gary. Making money or being right about the markets is not actually the issue being raised. There are plenty of reasons why the worse things get for the masses the higher the markets may well go. It’s your understanding of what’s really going on that is not coming across very well. It often sounds like you’ve been watching the mainstream media channels too long.
      I would suggest you watch the documentary ‘Capitalism-A love story’ by Michael Moore for a different perspective on rising stock markets. Though I would argue that it’s not Capitalism but Corporate Fascism that is being referred to, it is still a great documentary as there are some real gems that demonstrate how low things have already gone.

    • gary leibowitz June 6, 2012, 8:20 pm

      Buster,
      Just responding to fallingman’s assertion that I have a mental defect. You might consider it a “low blow”, but had I not responded the way I did, I would be in fact declared an idiot.

      As for the market’s rise, I never confuse the difference between the state of the economy and the market’s ability to levitate. It might seem to be at odds but in fact it makes perfect sense. Until we have a major collapse, earnings alone drive the market. With labor costs extremely low, lean employment, and the consumer continuing to buy into the service sector all is well. In fact corporations have never seen such huge capital reserves. We are not talking about an unusual spike in the market before the “big fall”. In three plus years earnings and stock prices have doubled. Surely you must admit your theory on an immediate, any day now, crash scenario is wrong. I did and have adjusted to the new reality. I don’t ignore the mounting pressures of debt implosion but I believe it is very transparent. In fact too transparent. Any hint of news breaking events are pounced on by the press. It is very rare that a crash happens with no warnings.

      &&&&&&

      Concerning that huge corporate surplus, let me repeat this: They will never, ever get to use it because there is no place $2 trillion can sit these days that will escape the deflationary Day of Reckoning that is coming. Meanwhile, cash-hoarding companies can do with their money what the rest of us are doing — i.e., earn “safe” yields that have been manipulated to the vanishing point. Just wait till short-term rates go negative and it costs the companies 25 (or more) basis points merely to leave all that money sitting somewhere. Europe is already at that point. RA

    • Buster June 6, 2012, 8:29 pm

      Point taken, Gary.
      Actually, I expect a rising market as you do. It’s just that the benefits of it, just as that of trillions in bailouts will barely be enjoyed by the sheeple of the world. The corporate fascist utopia is well on top now & they want it all to themselves.

    • gary leibowitz June 6, 2012, 11:01 pm

      Rick,
      I didn’t make the point about corporate surplus to suggest that will help the economy. It just goes to show how individuals are struggling to hold onto surplus cash while corporate america has never been more flush. It also shows how corporations survive and thrive in bad times. They will not get hit as bad as the rest of us, nor will they stay under as long.

    • fallingman June 6, 2012, 11:20 pm

      Gary,

      I was commenting on your inability to spell and punctuate, which betrays a disorganized mind to my way of thinking. Maybe that’s an unreasonable and indefensible bias.

      I assume English is your native tongue. If not, I take it all back.

      It strikes me as odd you would launch into a tirade about the markets. I said nothing about the markets. It also strikes me as odd that you would respond to this post when you dodged the pointed, but respectful, questions I posed to you last year.

      Frankly, when you didn’t respond, I wrote you off as a blowhard, who takes himself very seriously, yet won’t defend his positions. I mostly skip over your comments or just quickly scan them. I read this one. My mistake. I was struck by the carelessness. That’s all.

      As for your goofy reply, let me make this clear. I don’t give a hoot what you’re on record as declaring. It makes no difference to me. Declare away.

      Lastly, not that it’s any of your damn business, but yes, I bought gold. I bought a fairly large stash of British Sovereigns in the early 70’s when I was just a kid. They were selling for very little back then. I bought more gold in 2001 (and doubled up by going long Polish Zloty, Hungarian Forint, and Czech Koruna), and a little more in 2004 and 2005. None since. I’ve concentrated on silver. Physical and silver stocks. First bag of junk bought for $1,290 waaaaay back in the day. Bought more at $4.50, $7ish and $11+ oz in the wake of the Morgan takedown in 2008. But those are insurance positions, which I have sequestered in various locations for safety.

      Mostly what I do is trade option spreads. I’ve done about 190 over the last 7-8 years or so, (used to do covered calls) and I’ve had one losing trade. That’s a bit misleading in that I swing for single and doubles, not homeruns, and I build in a pretty good cushion of safety. So, what I gain in terms of percentage wins, I give up in terms of raw percentage gains. Still, it’s paid off well for me. I just consistently rake chips. I’m willing to be patient and let time value erode.

      I also trade mining, royalty, and commodity related stocks and well as some techs like AAPL and VMWare. I typically buy into oversold conditions where the MACD, RSI, STO, OBV are in oversold territory (and starting to turn up) and sell when stuff gets overbought. Nothing too fancy. I sell cash secured puts too.

      I’ve been light on the mining stocks since we got to $1,650 on the way up to $1,920 during the great ramp last year. I’m almost always a little early on the sell side and often a little early on the buy side. I just closed out of some SSO puts “too early” about a week ago.

      Anyway, that’s what I do. So, how does any of that relate to the nonsense you were spewing in your post? You have no idea whatsover how I’m positioned or how I trade. And yet, you went off like you have it all figured out.

      I don’t see the market as “basically worthless.” If I did, I wouldn’t be in it. I’m also not a gold fanatic. What ever gave you these impressions? I’ve been long the dollar for a couple months now. I call the dollar the clownbuck. I think it’s a piece of crap. I really like gold long term, but even crap can get oversold and the best assets overbought.

      I’m a trader Gary. I don’t really care what the vehicle is. If it’s cheap, I buy it. If it’s expensive, I sell it.

      So, next time you want to presume you know something, think again. Or rather, think for the first time.

      Now here’s the irony. I’m looking for a bout of deflation, followed by a massive money conjuring campaign. In short, I agree with you! Good god almighty, how did that happen?

      Of course, I’m not as smart as you Gary. I really don’t KNOW when that might occur. I can only guess. Of course, I realize I’m guessing. You don’t seem to.

      So far your sweet spot is a flat spot, but I have no doubt you’ll make lots of money with your confident predictions. I’m sure Yogi had no idea what he was talking about on that score.

  • Buster June 6, 2012, 5:07 pm

    We’re still waiting for the bailout money to trickle down to this end of the woods, Gary! In fact the only sniff of it around here is in the inflationary effects of our own financial geniuses having bet most of it on necessities of life, ie. commodities. These same great austerity-dodgers have been reveling in the looting made on the back of these bets here in London, to the tune of quite a few billion just in bonuses each year ever since they got the taxpayers’ money off him to save him, somehow???

    Of course, we’d all be losing our homes if it wasn’t for the bailouts, wouldn’t we? But hang on a minute. We have still been losing our homes!! It couldn’t all be a case of ‘double speak’ could it. Surely not…our polititions really sound like they’re looking out for our interests. And Obama’s got to be one of ‘us’, for god’s sake. I know he may well have surrounded himself with some of the most corrupt men Goldman Sachs could hire, but he says all the right things….??

    No! Let’s just get this straight. The bailouts were not, never were & never will be meant for the man on the street. He’s far more likely to be paying out more for something because of it than he is likely getting some of that money, believe me!

    And just to add to the clear case, has anyone noticed what Iceland did to remedy their debt crisis & how it’s working out, conspicuously unreported! They haven’t ‘punished’ their Banksters with free money deposited into their accounts earning interest to just sit there as our great orators have here, all obviously for the purpose of helping the peasants somehow?? No, they’ve done something really novel. Believe it or not, they’ve saved the man on the street not by giving the Banksters wads of money with which to beat the people with even more. Wait for it, they’ve actually sort of bailed out the people directly. Fancy that, hey! Actually cutting out the Goldman Sachs middle man!

    How on Earth are there still people talking as if everything’s all above board???
    Proof, surely that we all need another good beating from TPTB, just to clear the question up for everyone still confused about who owns whom.

    Put quite simply, I don’t ‘get’ how the “how bad it could have been” excuse is a good reason to make it even worse for us with every double handed solution that’s forced upon us??

    • Benjamin June 6, 2012, 6:00 pm

      Nice, Buster. And don’t forget all the property tax defaults. In my area, about 10,000 houses made that list earlier this year. That’s on top of the past decade or so of mounting defaults…

    • gary leibowitz June 6, 2012, 6:48 pm

      I agree that Iceland got it right but can it be done on a much larger scale? I would also remind you that all crisis events in the United States favored the money lenders. The theory goes that if you punish them you bite off your own foot. Whether that is the case hasn’t been determined since it has always been done one way.

      Can you imagine where we would be if the banks were allowed to take control of property and expect their loan to be paid in full?

      BTW, I agree that I am sloppy with my spelling and syntax. I don’t always have the time to “concentrate” my efforts. It is a struggle for me. If the sentence structure bothers you beyond my attempted discourse on a particular topic, than by all means ignore it. If my ideas are naïve or too simple for discussion, you again have the right to dismiss me. As for my logic and mental capabilities I can assure you I do have one. In fact you would be better off calling me an idiot savant. That might fit better than to dismiss me altogether. I currently work for a company that was taken over 3 years ago. They dismissed 6 co-workers, application and system programmers, and an IT manager, and left me to run the whole operation. Not the smartest decision, but one that was made by a new head of operations person that came from a web based system. If I can hold this company together with such lunatic decisions I certainly can claim some semblance of intelligence. Not however claiming to have a proper understanding of the english language. To conclude: Live with my idiosyncrasies or not, but I will not be able to change from being a toad even if kissed.

    • BigTom June 6, 2012, 8:03 pm

      Buster – your’e right. QE money is just sloshing around between financial institutions buying up soverign bonds while perpetuating a facade of governments functioning, personal gains pocketed by the money changers while papering over their misdeeds with congressional collusion here in this country. Money ain’t getting down to the end user, us! That is a bad scenario and the whole thing is imploding fast. Higher prices on everything while fewer things become available and in a society where the cash is drying up! This ugly is happening in Greece right now and soon to be spreading if massive QE is not quickly installed to lubricate this corrupt mess they have created. I don’t see how it can ever be fixed, only slow death by a thousand cuts…..
      Rick – great post today!

  • gary leibowitz June 6, 2012, 3:48 pm

    I don’t see that scenario at all. In fact the threat of loans being taken away will create a political reality that they must reign in excess spending. The people in Spain, Portugal, and Greece are already experiencing the affects of change in a big way. Govenment payrolls and promises are being taken away. They are already in a recession. If they are not careful a depression is right around the corner.

    Do you really think this deficit debacle hasn’t already affected millions? You can’t expect a dramatic reversal overnight. In fact had we done so 3 years ago we would already be in the deepest depression we ever were in. While most here would have liked us to cut the spending programs to the bone and let the survival of the fittest mentality rule, we have decided to soften the blow by spending in the hopes of stimulating the economy in a sustainable fashion. In the past spending our way out of a recession worked. This time however the world is awash in debt and the prognosis isn’t good.

    BTW, in Spain, a very socialist country, a house that is taken back by the banks does not relieve the borrower of his/her oligation to pay back the loan. Imagine what would have happened here if people couldn’t walk away from their debt.

    • D. Barber June 6, 2012, 7:42 pm

      “BTW, in Spain, a very socialist country, a house that is taken back by the banks does not relieve the borrower of his/her oligation to pay back the loan.”

      gary,
      View from here:
      Perhaps that’s why Europian countries are now discussing, and setting in place, border controls? Not welcome for some, and Not Welcome to Leave, with your capitol, for others?
      LTRO purchased one months worth of respite?
      Germany now offering them paper for their gold?
      Clever? Cleaver? Or both?

  • Oliver June 6, 2012, 3:15 pm

    Beautiful rant! “It is an affront to civilization itself that this kind of thinking should rule global markets…”
    What kind of thinking is that? Maybe we can come up with a good word….

  • John Jay June 6, 2012, 12:44 pm

    The populace in Europe does not seem to be as easily cowed as they are here in the States. I just read an article about the Greek governments troubles in collecting taxes owed to it. The banks are not cooperating with information requests for one thing. A pair of tax collectors that approached a gas station owner who was only taking cash for purchases were driven off by him with a bull whip and curses! Can you imagine what would happen to that guy here if he attacked IRS agents with a bull whip? Instant execution, very likely.
    Part of the problem here is that a some of our population will cheerfully play Gestapo as soon as they get in a position of authority at any level. From dog catcher to Attorney General. The saga continues!

    • Buster June 6, 2012, 3:02 pm

      Apparently, in order to prevent crocodiles attacking humans in some places it is necessary to shoot one every now & again. This is found to keep the crocs predatory instinct in check & allow for peaceful co-existence.
      Human beings, being predatory & posessing an unhealthy tendancy to push things to the extreme particularly when it comes to issues of greed & power, seem to need similar ‘prodding’ to keep the balance of power within acceptable limits for society to function in it’s present, effectively lawless other than that of the jungle, ‘order’ of things.
      There have been many publicised suicides in Greece lately as a result of overzelous tax inspectors, & this has led to some quite violent retalliation.
      If the austerity (just on the part of those outside the club, that is) is somehow prevented by the peasants then the Banksters will take their money back through devaluation & inflation. Just like when a large union wins a wage battle….the currency drops to allow for the extra expense to the corporatists. The markets may well rally on the back of this inflationary alternative solution.

  • Chris T. June 6, 2012, 9:04 am

    so rational that the 2 year german bond has a negative yield?
    I’ll pay you to loan you money….

    • Mark Uzick June 6, 2012, 9:29 am

      I was referring to stocks, but yes, even treasury bonds pay low to negative yields could be considered to be a hedge against some future scenarios: yields can always go further negative, resulting in a large capital gain.

      Robert even wrote an essay a little while back about how the fed may be planning to bid treasury bonds up into negative yield territory. I even made a little money, partially inspired by that essay, by buying puts on TBT. I may even buy those puts again if treasuries correct a bit more.

    • Alvaro de Orleans-B. June 6, 2012, 4:44 pm

      Yes, that’s exactly as you say and, believe it or not, it is rational.

      In other words, I pay you to loan my money to you because you are one of the very few counterparties likely to give 99% of my money back.

      Other loan counterparties promise to give me 102 – 106% of my money back, but there is a sizable risk that their promise will not be fulfilled.

      The more money a central bank issues to “solve the liquidity problem”, the more it will end up in insolvent pockets, putting the whole financial framework more and more in jeopardy.

      Let’s call back Paul Erdman to write about a plausible endgame scenario… meanwhile in Europe we are all holding our breaths trying to figure out what will actually happen and when.

    • Rich June 6, 2012, 6:47 pm

      Pity AdOB PE died near a Healdsburg Vineyard in 2007…

  • Mark Uzick June 6, 2012, 8:15 am

    With the looming prospect of massive money printing by the EU, the world’s largest economic block, and the situation in the USA, the presumptive “safe haven” even worse (The USA only appears to be better because of greater centralized control, giving it superior ability to manipulate the debt crisis by worsening it for the future the way a drunk might forestall a hangover by extending his drinking binge.), then why wouldn’t a rational investor move money into stocks, even if he thinks businesses are facing a dim economic environment, as both a hedge and a safe haven from fiat money?

    He’s got to figure that at least they’ll have some value, even if they represent less purchasing power than they do now, after the financial whirlwind destroys so many other asset classes.

    • Mark Uzick June 6, 2012, 9:11 am

      You might ask, “If they’re so worried, why they don’t just buy gold?”

      That would be a good point: gold is also a good hedge against financial turmoil, but where stocks are fairly priced in terms of earnings, they are overpriced in terms of their likely future prospects, so gold is overpriced by nearly 3 to 1 in current purchasing power, but is probably under-priced in terms of the prospect of fiat money’s future buying power.

      Each hedge has its advantages and disadvantages and there’s no way to predict with certainty which will perform best to preserve wealth. Even cash and treasury bonds can be considered hedges against possible scenarios.

      Wealth managers buying any of these asset classes are not, thereby, proving themselves to be idiots or criminals (though some may well be); they could be anyone – even someone as rational as yourself.

      Your angry tirades are fun to read though; but I would suggest that they be aimed at the idiotic and- or self serving crooked support by these captains of finance for state economic and financial interventions – not necessarily for their investment/speculative decisions.