Pumped Stocks Take Bad News in Stride

How’s the U.S. economy doing?  Although you couldn’t tell from the muted reaction of the stock market, yesterday’s headlines were as discouraging as we’ve seen in a while. For starters, the supposed recovery generated a feeble 119,000 private-sector jobs in April — less than half the number required to recoup positions lost during the worst years of the still-potent Great Recession. The usual bunch of “experts” had “expected” 175,000 new jobs, but even with seasonal adjustments and some other statistical hocus-pocus, the Guvvamint’s able spinmeisters failed to deliver the kind of numbers that get incumbents re-elected. There was also news that factory orders in March fell 1.5% from February. Although this datum reportedly was in line with expectations, it hardly supports the Recovery drumbeat that has been growing louder and louder with each passing week.

So loud, in fact, that it has prompted speculation that the Fed might raise interest rates in, um…2014. This is the kind of idiotic blather that gives the mainstream media its comic appeal. We can understand why Bernanke and the White House would want to put the story in play, and why a lazy, economically ignorant press would eagerly swallow it like a fish tossed to a trained seal.  The story is intended to make all of us rubes think the Fed actually believes its own story that the economy is recovering. If this were true, however, why would They wait until 2014 to put a lid on inflation?  Managing expectations is all the bankers are trying to do, of course, but sometimes the way in which they do it feels so clumsy that we can be forgiven for thinking that Bernanke and The Powers That Be take us all for fools.  As for the notion that the Fed is planning to raise interest rates:  Yeah, sure.  The idea that the Guvvamint would subject a bazillion dollars of debt (and growing) owed by all of us — and by itself — to higher interest charges is so outlandish it doesn’t even warrant discussion.  As Bernanke surely understands, a mere 25-basis-point tightening now, or in two years, could trigger a deflationary collapse that would leave the financial system and global economy in ruins for a generation.

Europe in the News!

Meanwhile, the stock market only wants to go higher, and damn-the-torpedoes.  Weighing on the broad averages yesterday — although not on the U.S. dollar — were a slew of despairing dispatches on Europe’s slow-motion crack-up.  There are now seven countries officially in recession, and unemployment throughout the region has risen to a post-euro high of 10.9%.  Unemployment is rising even in Germany, which will find it increasingly difficult to avoid recession with its main trading partners sinking into an economic quagmire. Needless to say, anyone who began the day worried that such concerns might knock Wall Street for a loop must have felt relieved by the close, since the stock market took the news easily in stride. The Dow Industrials settled just 10.75 points lower and were never down more than 75 points. One might infer that investors are confident that the U.S. economy will keep chugging along even as all of Europe and a growing swath of Asia slip into recession. In actual fact, with the most spectacular credit expansion in the history of the world still in high gear, stocks are unable to go down more than momentarily, so pumped are they with the gaseous exhalations of the central banks. For all of you permabears whose hopes spring eternal, however, here’s our rally target for the E-Mini S&P futures: 1439.50. Although we can’t guarantee that’s where the Mother of All Bear Rallies will end, we’ll be shorting there aggressively ourselves — albeit with very tight stops  – if the opportunity should present itself.

***

Win a Subscription Worth $106!

If you aren’t already receiving these commentaries by e-mail, sign up now and you’ll be automatically entered in a weekly drawing to win a three-month Rick’s Picks subscription worth $106.  Click here to register. What do paying subscribers get that lurkers don’t?  Plenty, including detailed daily trading “touts” and access to a 24/7 chat room that draws traders from around the world.

  • isjosa May 4, 2012, 10:21 am

    sara
    wow ! it seems so easy , thanks for the advice,

  • gary leibowitz May 4, 2012, 3:54 am

    I find it interesting that a failed measure of how the market should do is still being used today. We have had four years of sub-par employment and earnings have gone threw the roof. Wouldn’t you conclude that low employment means higher earnings. If it caused spending and savings to be down I would agree, but just the opposite is happening.

    You really must place yourself as a CEO of a big company. Will hiring more workers mean a better bottom line? Will low growth wages be good for earnings?

    Mortgage rates have never been lower. That is the one segment that must stabilize and it looks like it is doing just that. Low interest rates, whether orchestrated by governments or not is exactly the formula for higher earnings and a bank recovery. Does anyone question this argument?

    It’s all about the EU. I suspect many countries will moderate their austerity to allow themselves to survive. As Klugman stated you can’t expect growth and payment on debt if countries fall into a deep recession. Not the time for deep cuts in programs and spending. Moderation is the key. There is no hurry to reverse a socialist mindset in a couple of years. Let the balance sheet slowly recover and change the expectations of citizens in an orderly fashion.

    • gary leibowitz May 4, 2012, 3:58 am

      Mean to say Krugman, not Klugman.

    • redwilldanaher May 4, 2012, 4:59 am

      Krugman? George Will cleans his clock nearly every Sunday on TV and he’s a historian/writer. Pretty bad when you get sliced and diced by someone that’s not even in your line of work yet the discussion is of your line of work. Your Krugman reference has sealed it for me Gary. You deserve your fate.

    • mario cavolo May 4, 2012, 5:48 am

      I’ll say it again….”overall” spending isn’t down so far because the top 30% in the U.S. are richer than ever, while the bottom 40% are royally f*&^%d over, which indeed does explain the conundrum of spending with higher unemployment. The folks WITH money have much more of it, more than compensating for those that no longer do. This explanation is easy as pie as far as I can see.

      Meanwhile, on the point of changing the expectations of citizens in an orderly fashion, that’s an incredibly nice way of saying that those in power will quietly brainwash them and screw them over while making them feel like its, well, something they just sort of kind of can accept and rationalize while the monetary base continues to get sucked upward into the top percentages of the population. Good grief! THAT”S the problem!

      Cheers, Mario

  • Sara May 4, 2012, 12:43 am

    I’ve made well over 100k BUYING stocks for the last few years and holding. Currently still long a few nice stocks, while the doom-n-gloomers continue to talk negative. Wake up, get super long, and put down your internet picket signs (nobody listens, anyhow). The plan is to make money, and you can do that just like the government. Obama and Ben will be making millions as the sheep cry to sleep.

    • Mario cavolo May 4, 2012, 2:11 am

      Hi Sara, Wow quite the optimist, which is ok by me. But if you had started that lovely plan ten years ago instead of four, where would your portfolio be? FLAT…..which means lost money. Oversimplifying makes it sound easier than it is Sara and easier than “go super long” as advice. There are plenty of variables to mess-up a pretty plan including the one I,m pointing out here which is timing. Should we have told the people who entered the market in ’08 to go super
      long…?

      That said, I do also tend to believe that a rising inflationary expansion will, somehow, continue in all it’s corrupt glory…

      Cheers, Mario

    • Robert May 4, 2012, 8:56 pm

      Hi Sara-

      Doom and Gloom sells just as well as lemonade and apple pie… They simply appeal to separate market segments.

      Good luck with your ultra long positions.

  • Jill May 3, 2012, 11:20 pm

    The pizza joint doesn’t need to make propaganda, only pizzas. The government wants to propagandize citizens into believing that the Bernank’s primary role is to be a government employee, fixing anything that goes wrong with the economy for us, LOL. Lots of people actually believe that, and paying him a government salary helps to create that fiction for people.

  • redwilldanaher May 3, 2012, 5:40 pm

    After observing the gambling tables at Rick’s:

    Customer: Are you sure this place is honest?

    Carl: Honest? As honest as the day is long…

    It’s an illusion show through and through so anything is possible. To me a day like yesterday, as Rick has highlighted, and there have been many of them since 2009, attests to the fact that there is a permanent and unnatural bid that is maintained nearly at all times. ZH chronicles the absurdity of the releases that are used for propulsion. There have been > 5 sigma events too many times to count. The number are devised to be misleading to begin with and then we get to see the cheating done by government employee puppets that are told to “print the legend”. We live in an elaborate cage my friends.

    • Robert May 3, 2012, 5:53 pm

      Does anyone find it odd that Ben Bernanke has to “earn” a government salary…?

      Isn’t that like the owner of the Pizza place having to pay to make his own pie?

    • Steve May 4, 2012, 12:36 am

      Red, not if the game is control and justification in support of a doctorate theory that is just early spring smiling on the back of my yearling bull in the pasture.

      For those who don’t know the back side of an animal. Every spring the grass gets watery and a big green smile appears from hip to hip as the beefs tail swings through the squirting green.

      People like Ben are smarter, quicker, and far better than the masses. Ben believes he needs federal power to control the equation to make the end meet Ben’s justifications in theory in regard to never ending and ever greater debt that will never need to be paid back.

  • Bradley May 3, 2012, 4:12 pm

    Hmmm…gold goes down when stocks go up.
    Gold goes down when stocks go down.

    I wouldn’t imagine that whomever said they were having a hard time putting money to work in gold related things is having just as hard a time today…

    • mario cavolo May 3, 2012, 4:32 pm

      yea this past week or so, we see the correlations changed…. stocks and USD going up together responding to the idea that the U.S. economy shows strength. The EURO goes down with a bad European economy, and ergo gold goes down too as the USD goes up…ahh yes yes I’ve got it all figured out, I’m the next billionaire from trading…

  • gary leibowitz May 3, 2012, 3:44 pm

    You declare AAPL’s ability to skirt taxes as a positive yet when viewing Corporate America’s ability to reap huge profits with less workers you see that as a negative.

    Low wage and employment growth, combined with accelerated manufacturing, spending, and savings is a formula for higher earnings.

    Your reference to the EU is the sole concern we currently have that could put a wrench in the projected 16 percent earnings growth over the next 2 quarters. That is where I would focus my attention when deciding to enter or exit this market. If the EU, thanks to Germany’s insistence, continues to put heavy restrictions on budget spending than a recession could easily turn into a depression. I believe even if the EU goes the extreme route it will take time to hit the U.S. companies bottom line. Any news from large multinational companies concerning the EU slowdown will be front and center in my mind.

    The notion that low wages will plunge us into a recession has not happened. In fact after almost 4 years of low wages we have higher spending, higher saving, and higher earnings. The latest quarterly earnings figures did not alter this view. The wealth affect from a doubling of the stock market should not be underestimated. In fact the last gasp rally this market will enjoy should show accelearted employment and wages. Corporations compete against its workers. When its workers get the upper hand they suffer in form of lower earnings.

    For now the problems will come from overseas. SP500 derive 40 percent of its earnings from overseas. If they announce a slowdown that will impact (offset US gains) their bottom line than I would listen.

    • fallingman May 3, 2012, 5:14 pm

      Fewer…not “less” workers.

      &&&&&&

      A heroic last stand, fallingman…

      RA

    • redwilldanaher May 3, 2012, 5:42 pm

      Point Blank: Gary, are you a paid government schill?

    • gary leibowitz May 3, 2012, 7:24 pm

      I have been touting the doom and gloom scenario years before the housing bubble burst. I have of late realized that macro views and making money in the market are two very distinct from each other.

      Using a numbers crunching approach, as Mr. Buffett does, is far more lucrative. I came to realize that everything discussed on a macro level will be realized in the quarterly numbers, or with company news relating to their earnings. Timing is everything. To guess the end is around the corner is a futile approach. Barring any catastrophic event such as Spain rejecting the EU or the EU falling into a deep recession becuase of these auster measures I will stay the course.

      Knowing the end result but not knowing when is a hard play. I hope the market will telegraph such news and allow me to get out unscathed.

      BTW, my stop loss has taken me out of the market for now. I will most probably get back in within 4 weeks time, assuming current economic conditions don’t change much. I also wait to bet the Gold ETF since I believe it should hold up fairly well no matter what economic scenario plays out.

    • Steve May 4, 2012, 12:28 am

      Actually Gary, the U.S. is up 76.4890 percent for the currernt period in comparative contrasting with the majority putting saving in allodium at unheard of rates of 14.666 percent top tier caste d.C. This among immigrants based upon their ability to extract good by inauthentic means. Values based upon refractional fractionaries is looking extremely good with congressional value established via sec. 8, and 5 @ 49.333 x 00.00. Individually, based in future projections unrealized I will see a 875 percent gain the first week of July when I sell my assets for benefits.

    • mario cavolo May 4, 2012, 5:43 am

      Such fabulous sticklers on grammar.

      That’s very unique.

      Just kidding guys…:) M

  • Benjamin May 3, 2012, 12:39 pm

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/may/1/atf-will-investigate-plant-fire-in-illinois/

    Looks like the cost of galvanized will be going up.

    In other news, I thought yesterday was Sunday because when I picked the newspaper up off the porch, I noticed that it was as thick as the Sunday edition. As it turned out, the Wednesday paper was just considerably beefed up with the listings of county property tax defaults. There’s about 100 pages, with 100 listings per page! That is on top of the steady increase in those listings that have been taking place since 2007.

    But hey, if they can’t afford the property tax, then they don’t need new appliances. So ya see, the Joliet plant fire certainly won’t be of any consequence to the ongoing recovery (by 2014 or otherwise)!

  • Mark Uzick May 3, 2012, 12:29 pm

    Rick: As Bernanke surely understands, a mere 25-basis-point tightening now, or in two years, could trigger a deflationary collapse that would leave the financial system and global economy in ruins for a generation.

    A deflationary collapse is precisely the medicine that’s needed to prevent this outcome for the global economy. As for the “financial system”: it’s a fraudulent scheme that won’t be missed.

    • Robert May 3, 2012, 5:49 pm

      “Deflationary collapse” simply sounds TOOO scary.

      What we need is a “Global Icelandic-style moment of clarity”

      🙂

    • Mark Uzick May 4, 2012, 2:25 am

      Robert, just look at Rick’s sentence: He says that in a “deflationary collapse” the “global economy [will be] in ruins for a generation.”

      Those are his words – not mine. I’m only pointing out that it’s not true; that in fact, a deflationary collapse is just what the world needs for healthy economic growth. Let’s call it a “healthy deflationary cleansing of financial corruption and disease.”

  • mac May 3, 2012, 11:06 am

    Hi,
    100 million yanks “doing better than ever” is very doubtful in these times….sounds like mope via MSM, eh?
    The economic press is not necessarily “ignorant”, but they are the “bought press” of today.
    I see propaganda 24/7 on cnn, cbc,bbc, cnbc, bloomberg, and in almost every newspaper…there is the enemy, the real enemy, and the power tool of the monsters in control of this smoke and mirrors society.
    My advice is move to another country.

    • mario cavolo May 3, 2012, 11:30 am

      Hi Mac….done. Been based in Shanghai for over ten years. And while I agree with your idea that moving to another country is a viable consideration, expat life is fraught with a different set of challenges. For one thing, job security is job security wherever you go, and overseas, the “job” market isn’t really much better right now if you don’t have the particular set of skills and qualifications needed, very tough, competitive and soft executive recruiting market right now in Asia. And yes, one of the reasons is that more and more expats are flowing in. Indeed…

      Cheers, Mario

  • isjosa May 3, 2012, 9:02 am

    pat , the big problem in your post, as long as corporate earnings reamain strong. what makes you think that will be the case ?

    • Rick Ackerman May 3, 2012, 10:47 am

      How long can corporate earnings improve if workers’ paychecks don’t? Henry Ford understood this.

    • Pat May 3, 2012, 3:03 pm

      Corporate earnings are continuing to go up, not down and the economy is slowly improving. Actually, as long as Bernanke continues to print money, corporate earnings might not even be all that important, as long as they don’t fall off a cliff, which is unlikely.

  • mario cavolo May 3, 2012, 8:46 am

    I’m only pasting this in because it seems a quite meaningful economic indicator as part of our forum discussions here…of course the healthiest gains are in Asia…Cheers, Mario

    “Global air passenger traffic climbed 7.6% in March 2012, according to the latest data from the International Air Transport Association (IATA).

    Global air traffic climbed 7.6% in March 2012
    Comparisons with March 2011 are affected however, by the Arab Spring and Japanese disasters, which impacted air travel across North Africa, the Middle East and Asia Pacific. IATA estimated that without these events, passenger traffic would be up 5-6% year-on-year.
    “If we discount the industry’s growth by two percentage points as a result of the extraordinary events in 2011, airlines still managed an expansion in the range of 5-6%. Given the prevailing economic conditions with some European states returning to recession, passenger demand is holding up well. But this is bringing little relief to the bottom line because yields are not keeping pace with the continued very high price of oil,” said Tony Tyler, IATA’s Director General & CEO.

    Total passenger capacity rose 4.4% compared to March 2011, resulting in a load factor of 78.3%, up 2.4 percentage points over the same month last year.
    International air travel rose 9.6% year-on-year in March, while capacity climbed 5%, resulting in a load factor of 77.7%, up 3.2 percentage points from March 2011.

    • mario cavolo May 3, 2012, 9:13 am

      Related to economic stats, let’s take a closer look across the globe at who has more money and who has less money and invite anyone here to dig deeper with me on this…

      1. We can say 150 million Americans are heading into decline, with less and less money and opportunity, and overloaded with debt, due to many factors…

      2. We can say that more than 300 million Asians/Chinese have more money than ever, and with very little debt.

      3. We can say that 150 million or more Europeans are in decline, with less and less money and overloaded with debt.

      4. 80% of the rest of the world’s population is relatively poor, as usual throughout history.

      And so, is it a wash in terms of business/consumer economics?…That’s a separate question from the issues of the global banking/debt crisis.

      So then, WHO is out there spending money and how many actual people is it and how much are they spending and in which region are they located?

      IATA’s 5-7% year on year increase of air passenger traffic tell us that there’s a bunch of people out there who are spending money, consuming things, doing business. And since the vast majority of those people are flying coach, not 1st class, we can assume its not only the superwealthy and corporate expense account folks who are doing all the flying.

      I keep saying that while 150 million American’s lives are screwed, the top 100 million are doing better than ever, and so the U.S. economy is hanging in there.

      We can safely say that Bernanke and the banksters are pumping the bankings, but they are not pumping airline seat traffic, so what gives?

      …As there is obvious ridiculous gaseous pumping going on, we need to do our best to figure out where it is showing up across the global economies and biz sectors…

      Cheers, Mario

  • Pat May 3, 2012, 3:58 am

    Remember what David Tepper said 2 years ago…that no matter what happens, stocks will go up. If the economy improves, stocks will go up. If the economy swoons, Bernanke will flood the market with free money, and stocks will go up. Until someone can stop Bernanke from printing money and pumping up stocks, they WILL keep going up, its as simple as that. As long as corporate earnings remain strong the rally will continue. And don’t think for one minute that the dreaded “fiscal cliff” is going to happen. All those tax cuts and unemployment benefits will be extended by our wimpy politicians. By year end the SPX will likely be at all-time highs, even if Europe falls off the face of the earth !

    • mario cavolo May 3, 2012, 8:17 am

      Hard to disagree…but I’m looking at longer than the next 1-2 years…where will the various regions of the global economies, commodity prices and equity market prices be in 5 – 10 – 15 – 20 years…?

  • John Jay May 3, 2012, 3:47 am

    Latest talk is about all the spending cuts and tax increases that will take effect at the end of the year, with apocolyptic comsequences!

    Remember the Super Committee that was going to come up with the tough love to cut and tax?
    Nichts zu machen!
    Remember the draconian cuts coming to the USPS?
    Nichts zu machen!
    Big cuts to the military?
    Nichts zu machen!
    TARP money being paid back?
    Nichts zu machen!
    ZIRP is a doomsday machine, there is no turning back now.
    To add to the reasons why BB can never raise rates (i.e. stop buying Treasuries) is the following.
    Mortgage rates are now at 2.75% for a ten year, 3.75% for a thirty year.
    If the cost of money goes back to support 5% for a one year CD, and longer maturities priced accordingly, we are right back to what brought down all the S+Ls back in the day of the Keating Five. Who were recruited by C. Keating’s lobbyist……….. Alan Greenspan!

    Yes, the S+P has doubled since the bottom in 2009, and so has gasoline, crude oil, candy bars, corn, coffee, oats, gold, silver, copper, wheat, pork, milk, etc.

  • Robert May 3, 2012, 12:53 am

    Ok let’s talk about interest rates for a moment, because the markets have gone completely catatonic due to the Fed’s published stance regarding low rates until 2014…

    So, ummmm, what’s gonna happen in 2014 to warrant higher rates, exactly?

    Are they expecting WWIII to be over and done by then? Perhaps a new post-war economic uphoria ala the 1950’s?

    Or, maybe Gold will be ending a stratespheric blow off around then, and higher rates will be necessary to draw savings away from Gold? Hmmm wait, no that won’t work because Gold’s bubble already popped in 2011.

    Oh, I know… The goverment’s earned income from taxes will be SOARING in 2014 and the Treasury will easily be able to fund its obligations.

    Yeah, that must be it.