A Painless Way to Buy Plummeting Mining Shares

Without intending it, Rick’s Picks may have become an oasis for gold and silver bulls who are at the point of despair over the mining sector’s relentless, and presumably unjust, plunge. We have good news for you:  Using technical tools to tweak your timing and risk management, it’s possible to buy “crap” stocks all the way down without getting hurt if you’re early. We use the word “crap” ironically, of course, since it is only when stocks have been beaten down as badly as those in the mining sector that they become screaming bargains. And that pretty much sums up the situation as far as we’re concerned. Not that the blighters who have been doing the selling couldn’t bludgeon bullion shares even lower before they relent. In the meantime, wouldn’t it be lovely to take all that stock from their undeserving hands — and to do so without penalty or punishment if we are premature?

On the subject of mining-sector “crap,” a perfect example is the execrated and abhorred GDXJ, an Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) that tracks the shares of junior gold mining companies.  Although it has an ardent following among Rick’s Picks subscribers, GDXJ has unfortunately proven treacherous to the financial health of long-term investors. Some of them may have thought GDXJ looked like a great bargain a couple of months ago when it was trading for around $30 a share, down from a high of $43 in 2011. We told subscribers to hold off on buying, however, warning that the stock could eventually fall to $20 or even lower. That is still a possibility. Nonetheless, to avoid missing a possible long-term bottom, we started nibbling at 23.93, a “Hidden Pivot” target first advertised in the newsletter when GDXJ was still above $26.  The buy at 23.93 proved timely when the stock, having gone no lower than 23.90 that day, surged to 25.79 – a 7 percent rally. With the stock steeply on the rise, we further advised subscribers to take partial profits to reduce position risk. And then we sat back and waited for GDXJ’s fabulous bull market to unfold.

It was not to be, however, and when GDXJ fell anew, we recommended exiting the position, still profitable on paper, at 23.59.  And then we did it all over again, buying August 23 calls when the stock was hitting a new, targeted low at 22.74.  The options cost us $1.80 apiece, but we were able to reduce their effective cost to 1.45 by selling half of them for a profit when GDXJ rallied to 23.85. Thereafter, it was “rinse and repeat”:  With GDXJ shares getting schmeissed yet again yesterday, we exited the options on the opening for 1.50, booking a small profit on paper.  And now, we plan to try again if and when the stock falls to our next downside target, 20.72.

Worth All the Work?

By now, you’re probably thinking this sounds very labor-intensive.  It is, but it is still the best way we’ve found to take the sting – and most of the risk – out of buying assets that look like bargains on paper but which are nevertheless continuing to get savaged on a regular basis, however unjustified. This would be true of  Silver Wheaton as well, another mining stock with which Rick’s Picks subscribers have had a longstanding love-hate relationship. We like the stock ourselves as a long-term play, but our enthusiasm will always be tempered by the coldly technical analysis for which Rick’s Picks is known. It led us to buy June 40-42 calls spreads a couple of months ago when the stock was carving out a promising bottom. Immediately thereafter, when SLW rallied as expected, we took sufficient partial profits to reduce the cost basis of our vertical bull spreads to zero. And a good thing, too; for despite Silver Wheaton’s atrocious performance ever since, we continue to hold a riskless, bullish position that causes us no concern.  That’s not to say our spreads will produce a profit, however. That would require SLW to rally above $40 between now and mid-June, when the options expire.  Most Silver bulls would have taken that bet back in early March, when we got on board near $34. But with the stock currently trading for around 28.34, it has become a 50-to-1 horse.

For the record, we told subscribers to buy more Silver Wheaton shares yesterday at 27.97, a Hidden Pivot correction target. Lo, the stock bottomed at exactly 27.96 (see chart above) after plummeting $1.38, or nearly 5 percent, in the first hour of the session. The trampoline bounce from within a penny of the target took SLW to 28.76 intraday. We were well on top of the move with an intraday bulletin telling subscribers to take a partial profit at around 28.66.  This effectively reduced our cost basis for the shares to 27.47 – 50 cents beneath the pit-of-despair bottom achieved at the low. How can we lose, right?

We’ll see. In the meantime, Rick’s Picks will continue to do its utmost to help long-term bullion bulls precisely time mining-share purchases so as to avoid the pain and misery of buy-and-hold strategies.  You can follow the process, and perhaps join in the fun, by taking a free subscription to Rick’s Picks with just a click of the mouse.

***

Win a Subscription Worth $106!

If you aren’t already receiving these commentaries by e-mail, sign up now and you’ll be automatically entered in a weekly drawing to win a three-month Rick’s Picks subscription worth $106.  Click here to register. What do paying subscribers get that lurkers don’t?  Plenty, including detailed daily trading “touts” and access to a 24/7 chat room that draws traders from around the world.

  • Rick Ackerman April 24, 2012, 10:17 pm

    I’ve been seeing many of the same things, Robert, but over a period of years, not just recently. Mainly, it’s a case of large, phantom bids and offers fading even the smallest genuine bids and offers. This is not so much a function of high-speed (“algo”) trading, where bids and offers aren’t even displayed, but of neural-net arbing and hedge-trading by firms. Large bids or offers will usually trade only if an advantageous offset comes in serendipitously. “Size” bids and offers will occasionally be crossed, but I gather this is mostly firm traders front-running their own customers. That was one of the biggest sources of risk-free profits when I was an option market maker in the 1970s/80s, and I doubt the game has changed since.

    The regulators are “looking into” high-speed trading, but merely doing so may obligate them to shut the whole business down, since there is no legitimate or even redeeming rationale for the practice.

    • FranSix April 25, 2012, 3:40 pm

      Just wanted to point out that HFT “churn” is a sign of delta hedging strategies based on the Black Scholes options pricing model.

      All asset classes are now subject to these hedging strategies which parry the money gained from stock sales into the rising trend of treasury prices. Gold mining stocks are the quintessential hole in the ground with a liar up top, so they make excellent vehicles for a risk free return.

      Unless, of course you show a profit and pay out dividends.

      I don’t pretend to know the depth of delta hedging strategies in the markets, but they certainly are pervasive and in use across the entire commercial banking sector.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_Hedging

  • Robert April 24, 2012, 9:01 pm

    Ok, here’s my question for anybody trading the mining shares:

    How many of you are having your orders filled in size?

    up until about 6 months ago I always did. – Bid on 5000, and I’d get 5000, or maybe 2500 here and 2500 there.

    Today, EVERY single order goes in 100 share blocks.

    HFT has pervaded this sector more heavily than any other.

    I hear all about howthe machines just churn the market trading with each other, but that is not true – the machines churn the market by front running every legitimate order.

    I like what Jesse had to say about it in his blog:

    “I am not trading nearly as frequently or aggressively as in the past because a) I am getting older b) these markets are almost ridiculous. Its like playing cards with the little girls.

    If I put in a order for a few thousand shares, the liquidity from a large offered set of multiple positions evaporates instantly and I close on maybe 100 shares. If I offer to buy above market but below ask I get ten ‘friends’ appearing instantly along with my bid.

    There is little genuine liquidity in the equity market. It is mostly a sham, a flash crash waiting to happen unless the ESF intervenes which I am sure they will. At the first sign of real trouble it will collapse like a house of cards.

    As for gold and silver, price discovery is buried under a mountain of paper and faux trades. With 100:1 leverage and naked positions dominating the trade, its a bit of game in the short term at best, and not a particularly honest one at that.

    Don’t exhaust yourself chasing rainbows here. Sometimes the best trade is to stay out of the short term scrums, the wash and rinse cycles, and just ride the macro trends, ignoring the day to day noise. And judging by the shrinking volumes and low open interest, quite a few people are fine with that decision.

    The pit crawlers had best start studying origami and advanced airplane design to while away their empy hours, with only phony computer generated order flows and Fed buying programs to light up their screens.”

  • FranSix April 24, 2012, 4:44 pm

    I prefer to think that dynamic hedging strategies are weighing on the mining shares.

    Once yields decline below 3.15% on the long-dared treasury bond, you can be pretty sure that the sell-side has wrung out every last bitter drop from the mining sector.

  • Dale April 24, 2012, 4:29 pm

    Avocado

    I too am wary of E & M technical analysis. Gold is in a huge decending triangle that targets…… 1140! Ugh!

  • Avocado April 24, 2012, 2:46 pm

    I’m curious. Silver has the mother of all descending triangles in the making. Peaks at 50 a year ago followed by two successive lower peaks at 44, (two in Aug/Sep 2011) followed by another lower peak at just under 38, at the end of Mar 2012. A downslope trendline. The almost perfect horizontal support is at 26, first defined in Feb 2011, then again in Sep and at the end of last year.

    If the descending triangle plays out like many of them do then silver is set to go to next to nothing. Can this really happen? I’m no longer so sure about the reliability of classical technical analysis as outlined by Edwards & Magee, as I’ve seen too many such formations fail in the new market we are in.

    On the other hand SGR:TSX did produce a picture perfect H&S top from late 2009 to late 2010 that so far has played out as planned. Topped out at 5, the formation calls for a drop to 1, and so far its well on its way to 1. Management is helping it along with continuous helpings of newly issued shares and the inability of them to execute on there mining plans. They keep overestimating output and underestimating costs.

    So what’s the story with Silver? If it drops below 26 more than the 3% called for by E&M does it then go to zero? Or is it more likely to fail the formation and break out on the upside, and if its going to do that, then why? From a technical perspective, not too much money chasing too few ounces of silver.

    Andy

    • Rick Ackerman April 24, 2012, 4:10 pm

      Using Hidden Pivot analysis, my worst case for Silver, basis the May futures, is 20.520. This seems unlikely, though, because the futures have struggled so hard since September to go lower following the seemingly ominous breach of last January’s 26.593 low.

      The Hidden Pivot Midpoint ‘sibling’ of 20.520, and therefore a logical minimum downside objective for the near term, is 29.050. If and when the futures get there, I would encourage subscribers to buy aggressively at that price, albeit with very tight control of risk.

      Alternatively, on the 30-minute chart and as of today, the May contract would need to rally, merely, to 32.095 for bulls to regain the offensive.

  • John Jay April 24, 2012, 2:12 pm

    Speaking of gold mines.
    Here is a link to an article in Bloomberg today from a Business Week article.
    About how the super rich can pay no taxes, not even the 15% capital gains tax.
    Nice when you just make up the rules to suit you and get away with it.
    http://tinyurl.com/bqh6z93
    I saved a copy for myself, just in case I get that rich.
    You never know.

  • RidetheWave April 24, 2012, 7:04 am

    Rick,

    It’s worth the work to offset the pain. Having taken this route with you in earnest starting last week when I began my pre-work, ultimately taking the class, and then having spent countless hours of my own studying since, on the monthly to 1 minute charts on my favorite vehicles, there is no doubt in my mind that I moved from being a mining addict to an HP addict.

    Starting,2 weeks ago I have sold nearly all of my miners at losses that would have been worse had I not. With those funds, and your training, I put my bias aside, and continued to roll free cash into GDX puts of which I took 75% profits off today.

    Today I even successfully shorted SLW and then mechanically turned and went long it at your tout. I loved it. It felt like discipline and control amidst a storm in chaos. What’s not to like!?

    I am sure my new found discovery of being bearish on mining stocks when its the right trade was met with disgust and a sense of treachery among the gold and silver gang that inhabits these parts (your site) but as one of your converts (Edd) who completed a similar transformation said earlier, its much more comforting to exert small financial capital to make the right trade in miners, than to exert the mental capital and dwindling account, to only play the long and for the last 7 months – increasingly wrong side of the trade.

    Thanks for all that you do,

    Liberated Miner Long & Pure Trader

    Ride the Wave