Using ‘Camouflage’ to Trade the E-Mini S&P

Stocks broke out of a two-day holding pattern yesterday morning and then stalled, presumably to wait for that mote of benign economic news that can be relied on to stir up some short-covering. There wasn’t enough news on the tape yesterday to stir up much of anything, even by Wall Street’s liberal standards. Just an item suggesting that manufacturing in the New York region had “unexpectedly” increased, and another item that had the U.S. and Britain thinking about tapping the ol’ strategic oil reserves to help “calm” energy markets. Fortunately, however, from a trading standpoint, the day was hardly a wash for Rick’s Picks subscribers who attended the tutorial session that we give every Wednesday morning for graduates of the Hidden Pivot Webinar. (Click here for details concerning the  upcoming class, and get a $50 discount.) Students are advised to come to these classes ready to trade, and although we don’t always have an opportunity to pull the trigger during the sessions, a moderate breakout in the E-Mini S&P Thursday morning gave us good reason to act.

The pattern we used to initiate a long position is highlighted in the chart above, and the means that we employed to leverage it is called “camouflage” trading. Essentially, this technique entails identifying very subtle breakouts that are likely to go unnoticed by conventional support-and-resistance traders. In this case, we had to zoom in on the 5-minute chart to find a precise “camo” rationale for getting long. Typically, we risk no more than five ticks theoretical, or $62.50, when we get long or short in the E-Mini S&P.  This trade called for a bit more — $87.50, to be precise – and so we initiated the trade on one contract rather than the usual four. Because one student had purchased five contracts on the entry signal, however, our follow-up guidance for the trade contained risk-management strategies for a single-contract and a five-contract position. Both positions were still “live” as we went to press Thursday night.  For your interest, here is the “tracking update” that went out to subscribers intraday. It is still in effect: “We got long at 1391.25 (June contract) during this morning’s tutorial session, so I am establishing a tracking position.  Although one person in the room bought five contracts on the entry signal, I had cautiously advised a single-contract trade. Accordingly, and because we are swinging for the fences on this one, I will suggest a trailing stop that effects a 1:3 risk/reward.  Our target is 1412.75 (Daily chart, A=1291.25 on January 30, B=1371.25 on February 29), and so, with the futures currently trading at 1396.00, the trailing stop is 5.75 points.”

Please note that the “fence” here is the 1412.75 target noted above. A single contract exited there than had been purchased for 1391.25 would produce a trading profit of $1075. That number is a Hidden Pivot, and we expect it to be  tradable from the short side if and when it is reached. If you’re interested in following along, or in hearing more about “camouflage,” you can ask subscribers about such things yourself. Click here for a free trial subscription to Rick’s Picks that will give you access to our 24/7 chat room, as well as to Rick’s detailed daily trading recommendations.

***

(If you’d like to have these commentaries delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)

  • Cam Fitzgerald March 19, 2012, 4:05 am

    Yaaay SD1. And I would but it seems everyone here is so exhausted (or disgusted) by politics they didn’t want to engage this weekend. My big plan was just to fire up the commentary by starting an argument. That did not work. It just seemed too quiet around here but then again the nice weather is getting people out of the house for a change. Calling Ron Paul a nut is much more controversial at the Picks. Even dissing Gold gets the troops fired up and mad but I can’t go there since I think it is preparing for a launch. I might even join the Gold Huggers this year!

    So yeah….I got nuthin else.

  • roger erickson March 16, 2012, 7:20 pm

    Who says incumbents don’t have monopoly power?

    “Britain is poised to cooperate with the United States on a release of strategic oil stocks that is expected within months, two British sources said, in a bid to prevent fuel prices choking economic growth IN A US ELECTION YEAR.”
    http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/15/us-oil-reserves-idUSBRE82E0UM20120315

    • roger erickson March 16, 2012, 7:23 pm

      oops; triggered that comment before finished;
      “expected within months” = at Obama’s discretion 🙁

      point is that outside surprises have to be tracked too;

      If you sample the full press/blogs, not just the owned media, you can get a sense of political hidden pivots about to alter the course of manipulated mkt hidden pivots. It’s all about early detection & early response.

    • gary leibowitz March 16, 2012, 9:35 pm

      The doubling of the stock market in his term must also be manipulation. Oil prices haven’t exactly fallen following this news. In fact it is higher. I guess Obama hasn’t gotten to the big hedge firms yet.

      I suspect it is good PR if nothing else.

    • Larry D March 17, 2012, 6:04 pm

      Of course, the housing market hasn’t exactly doubled during BHO’s reign. I think Gary is right.

      Psst – Gar – maybe he has a little deal going on with the big hedge firms right now. That greenlighting of the Buffett deal for BOC gives pause. Sort of like the no-strike agreement Roosevelt had with labor during the war.

    • Cam Fitzgerald March 18, 2012, 4:46 am

      Come off it Larry. You should (presumably) know better than that. No force can stop a housing bubble from bursting. No president is capable of reversing a reversion to the mean either. Are you so foolish a person to presume that somehow it is the fault of the current administration that they cannot do what has NEVER been done before? Honestly, I can’t stand reading some comments like yours that are so obviously partisan. Sadly, yours smacks more of dishonesty if not simple ignorance of both politics and economics.

      Which is it Larry?

    • SD1 March 19, 2012, 3:53 am

      Go get ’em Cam! I am tired of people blaming Obama for previous administrations screw-ups!