The Exhaustion of Post-Modern Excess

[What themes will drive investment in the next decade? In the essay below, ‘Mercurious,’ a frequent contributor to the Rick’s Picks forum, sees the ebullient U.S. consumer as a dying breed. Even so, for investors who understand that consumption itself is not going to die but merely change, there is money to be made. RA]

As investors, we should be keen to discern changes in large-scale behaviors that will affect the what and when of our buys. The market ideally is a barometer of where we are in an increasingly interconnected world, and even factors like high frequency trading are usually just amplifiers of what is, rather than total distortions of it. When we survey the effects of ongoing world-wide financial and political distress, can we begin to see changes in the contours of how we think and what we buy? If we do, it would be prudent to take them into consideration and invest accordingly.

To begin, this is fundamentally a U.S.-centric analysis. While other areas of the world are rising fast in overall consumption spending and investing, the U.S. still leads that metric, and for the time being remains the dominant arbiter of popular culture. I think the feedback mechanism of instant communications is supporting the emergence of a world-wide cultural norm, so this is not just about the U.S. in the long run, but I’ll confine myself to the U.S. for now.

Some themes we would want to be aware of in orienting ourselves to the current domestic landscape would be: a flood of technological innovation, much of it focused on and available to the masses; a retreat/collapse in widespread employment of a level consistent with a middle-class lifestyle as we’ve come to know it; tremendous political ferment on both the left and the right; unprecedented levels of distrust in the large institutions of our culture such as corporations, government and religion; a rising tide of privacy invasion by government and business, with the concomitant problems of identity theft and sense of violation; a medical care model that offers mind-numbing costs married to patently inferior outcomes; numerous examples of small-scale innovation that outperforms lumbering corporate fixes; rage against the injustice and inequality of a system that richly rewards elite failure and hands the bill to the average American; a non-stop torrent of messages, advertising, propaganda, spin and entertainment/diversions to a nerve shattering level; a near-universal belief that the game is rigged in the markets and political arena such that true competition has been throttled and “you can’t win” against entrenched interests. There are subtexts to these ideas that are important, but this is a start.

The Post-Modern Consumer

If we were modeling a U.S. consumer under these conditions, what would we come up with? Someone in a state of high agitation with less and less commitment to all present large systems, struggling to make ends meet with no relief in site, lacking the characteristic American optimism of the past, more trusting of decentralized and small-scale approaches, and less able to withstand further financial shocks yet more vulnerable than ever to experiencing them. And then there’s the bad news.

Given these and similar underlying variables, is it reasonable to expect consumption patterns, political alignments and lifestyle choices to reflect the past? Hardly…but that’s not the question. Rather, how will these behaviors reshape themselves over time and how can we as investors arrive early and reap the benefits?

As a starting point, I would suggest we can look forward to increasing tension between what we want and what we have to pay for it, in both real and intangible terms. Americans are in the middle of a largely unconscious process of seeing the world reordered and our place in it diminished. Easy money is being replaced by tougher times with little relief in sight. We’re making choices, clipping coupons, cutting back, cutting out, rethinking the need for the many unnecessary “essentials” of textbook American life. This will have a profound effect not just on consumption patterns but on our national psyche, with consequences that are difficult to predict. But I think one outcome that’s assured is more of us will be voluntarily dropping out, in a consumptive and political sense.

Train to Nowheresville

There comes a time when the sheer overload of keeping up with it all becomes so unmanageable that we lose the desire to continue. Whether it’s the academic over-training that prepares master’s degree holders for a job as a rental car desk clerk, or the product cycle of many contemporary goodies rivaling the life of a mayfly, at some point many more will discover the value of not jumping aboard this train to Nowheresville. Even sheep eventually figure out when they’re in danger and will act accordingly. And we will, too.

Recent calls for closing accounts with large banks have resonated strongly, with credit union bank membership soaring. Open source computer applications are being offered to thwart the business models of megacorps that threaten our online privacy. Popular forms of shunning such as Change.org petitions can marshal hundreds of thousands of the like-minded in a matter of days, and have been instrumental in quickly melting adamantine positions that offended the popular sensibility. (When was the last time constituent letters to Congress had that effect?) Numerous alternative sources of information are being utilized with great effect as people learn there’s “the story” and there’s the truth. Hidden pivots or EF Hutton…your choice.

Big Change=Big Adaptation

As we scan the horizon, we might want to be especially aware of trends that are counter to the strongest dynamics we see today: conspicuous consumption, mass anything, lack of regard for basic goods/services that we take for granted. All it will take is a large enough subset of our culture to willingly adapt to our changed circumstances and de rigueur will morph to rigor mortis. It’s happening already. When I was twenty-something, living at home would have been my cohort’s second choice after entering a Cambodian re-education camp. But that same demographic today views it as a smart alternative, enabling them to maximize smaller discretionary incomes. Which brings me to my final point.

Anyone who takes a simple-minded contrarian position going forward will be surprised, I believe. If you expect cash strapped youth to give up their expensive smart phones and the accounts to service them, you might not like your investment results. As humans, we require certain artifacts be kept nearby to constantly remind ourselves of how great it is to be here. Ice cream consumption went way up in the Great Depression and I would expect iPhone market penetration to mirror that in our second Great Depression, taking into account both cost of living and ego inflation. But that may not be where the real money is to be made.

Food, energy supplies, clean water, secure societies in every sense: I would be looking in this direction for investments that would provide outsized performance for many years to come. There are a number of exciting and well-developed decentralized technologies that could revolutionize any one of these areas. The problems are not technology and finance, it has been their application to the trivial and destructive. As we move further into a future that rediscovers the importance of getting the basics right, I think we’ll emerge battered but better for the journey.

And one last thought: Water is the new silver.

***

(Mercurious is a technical writer and consultant for a mid-sized entity that seems to be structured after the Daily Planet model. He lives along the sunny Gulf Coast, is represented by Congressman Ron Paul (may his tribe increase), and enjoys a short bike ride to the beach and good books, always non-fiction. He believes we are in a paradigmatic phase change of world-wide proportions and is not at all sure how it will turn out. He considers himself lucky to be old enough to remember when songs described now as classic rock were first released and to have discovered silver at $4.70.)

(If you’d like to have these commentaries delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)

  • mava March 12, 2012, 12:44 am

    It would appear, at first only, to speak of the same things you speak of. But not after a closer, more inquisitive look.

    In general, taking links from patrick (if this is where you saw it) should be done with a freight train load of salt. He was simply beautiful on “why you should not buy house”. I too, thought at that time, that he is actually smart guy. Nope. He turned out to be pretty dumb, as you can tell by an absolute dominance of socialist propaganda on his page today, he just happen to have a good view on housing, as applicable to 2006 -2009 period. It doesn’t look as this was the case of a broken clock being right twice a day, but sadly, he was not right on anything else ever since.

    • Mercurious March 14, 2012, 5:55 am

      Thanks for doing the leg work on that. Indeed, I came across it re the housing decline and not by way of the other avenues you mention. Nothing to get pissed off about in your comments, as far as I’m concerned, if presented in the spirit of open inquiry. Someone once said, ” There is no religion higher than truth.” The same could be said about nearly everything else, too.

  • mava March 11, 2012, 8:09 pm

    I had looked at the guy before, and looked at his writing again, to refresh my memory.

    He is an idiot. Let me bring up the reason why I think so, before I piss you off by being equally outrageous.

    He doesn’t understand economics. Watch these:

    “Unfortunately, the Efficient Market Hypothesis that dominates contemporary economic thought simply does not hold-up in the face of empirical reality. Even its weakest version is easily shown to be false. The reality is that stock prices, rather than following a random walk, swing up and down in somewhat regular wave-like patterns. On Wall street these swings are commonly referred to as “bull” and “bear” markets, where a bull market involves rising equity prices and a bear market entails falling prices. These patterns, in turn, are reflections of recurrent swings in the mood of both investors and society in general which precipitate the ups and downs in the economy known as “business cycles”.

    A business cycle, is precipitated by a violent intervention by the government, under a cooperation with equally dishonest economists as the author himself. Here, he lies outrageously. Allow me to produce a statement in analogy with his way of lying.

    “As Nazi execution officer’s observations reveal, when Jews are shot in the temple of their scull, they tent to die immediately due to huge emotional distress wave.”

    And again:
    “According to the EMH, stock investors think and behave rationally in seeking to buy and sell equities. In a nutshell, this means that individual and institutional investors will seek to buy shares of stocks at low prices and sell at higher prices such that their net gain is maximized.”

    Nope. This will ONLY happen if we are talking of speculators as a market participant class. If we are talking about investors, they would want to “invest” (hence, investor) into an enterprise in order to partake in business profit. Entrance and exit price is of little consequence to an investor.

    So, what I am trying to say is that this guy pontificates about things as complicated as EMH, and yet, doesn’t even understand the first and foremost about economy and markets.

  • Mercurious March 11, 2012, 3:27 pm

    As sometimes happens, I just came across a web page that treats on some of these topics and more in quite a bit of depth; there is even a substantial entry on Contrarianism & Irrational Exuberance…this from a 1994 master’s thesis! Sounds like we are channeling. For those with an interest: http://www.spiritoftruth.org/Thesis/

  • mava March 10, 2012, 8:33 pm

    Mercurious,

    Very good article, I enjoyed it,even if not necessarily agree with it.

    Few points, if I may:

    People choosing decentralized options vs, centralized ones, is actually a very bad sign. This is because they are not doing it to realize their objections to socialism, but instead to underscore their adherence to it. They are correctly perceiving bigger companies as fascist entities, however, what bothers them is that they are not socialist. They see a big corporation as a big bad capitalist entity, which they think is what fascism is. They want socialism instead, which is why they make decision to withdraw. Keep in mind, they withdraw to help socialist cause, not to hurt it.

    What this means, I think, is that along the way, the masses are going to make some very big, monumental mistakes, and they are NOT going to be able to emerge on the other side.

    I am expecting a bloody revolution that leads to non-solution, pretty much like the Russian Revolution in 1917. Both then and now, the masses are assuming control without having an idea of what is it to achieve, much less how to achieve it.

    Both then and now, this is far far from the case, where a prudent partner just walks to his car, and leaves in silence never to come back, but rather to continue doing the business the right way, even if alone. No.

    Both then and now, this is a case of a teenager having enough of his dis functional parents, screaming to the car with stolen keys, and pushing that pedal to the metal before he could even close the door. He is definitely going to wrap himself around the light pole.

    It is easy to see this in opposing light, as you do, because the ideas are capable of being mirrored, reverting everything inside out. You personally, probably doing it exactly to fight the fascism, except you actually know that fascism has a lot to do with socialism, and nothing at all with capitalism.

    BTW, same here, no TV service for years (have a huge screen, of course, for games and movies), no over-the-air-tv, nothing. I am so happy I did it back then, as even though I felt like I was doing something right, I didn’t know how good this is actually going to be. I refuse to keep my reprogramming port open.

    • Mercurious March 11, 2012, 7:34 am

      Very interesting, a different perspective on the whole thing. I guess time will tell, and I know you would prefer it not to be the case we wind up the way you describe but I have to admit dropping out for some/many may just be a recognition that the system doesn’t work for THEM, not that the system doesn’t work at all. Certainly not the case with most who frequent this blog I assume, but I can’t dismiss your point out of hand.

  • Mercurious March 10, 2012, 7:15 pm

    Mark, not to monopolize this blog entry but you bring up points worth considering.

    In order:
    “I simply wanted to know why people more trusting of decentralized and small-scale approaches wouldn’t be less vulnerable to financial shocks; and then I speculated on what this paradox might imply.”
    To answer what I missed the first time–because they are looking for solutions to situations that they are in already. When we’ve been burned by the big players in society, we turn to smaller, more local or human scaled answers that we hadn’t considered before. It doesn’t mean our mortgage isn’t still under water, our jobs less precarious or our money is now stabilizing in value. It means we’re looking in other directions for fixes, but we’re still exposed in the interim. This is not the work of a day.

    On your Chase cards: This is the old saw revisited of what is good for the individual may not be good for society. I pay more than I have to for products produced locally because the intangible good that comes from that is more important than savings. This is NOT a slur on you but Chase et al all operate on the same principal you have articulated, it is pure economic benefit. I think there are other values worth considering. “If I cut my cards up, I’d be doing them a favor.” If YOU did, it would, yes. I suggested that EVERYONE do that. Big difference…Chase would hardly view that as a favor.

    On your last point, I would have to respectfully suggest re-reading what I wrote; it is consistent rather than of two minds. I didn’t say withdrawal from social life, I said the CONSCIOUS choosing of our values, in fact made a couple of points about not needing to think of it in terms of a bleak and austere existence. What I suggest, in a nutshell, is 1) make decisions based on personal but objective observation that preserves the values we believe in 2) withdraw our time, attention and support for those values we don’t believe in and 3) as investors, use that value arbitrage to realize we are not the only ones making those judgments, and we can financially benefit from it.

    I am very fortunate not to be living a life of social withdrawal. But I haven’t owned a TV in a decade because I can’t stomach what I see there, I spend my free time doing things that help my community, and I try to spot investment opportunities that will make money while undermining the control the elite would like to exercise in all our lives. It is not that hard to do, certainly easy to begin.

    Great comments and I appreciated the chance to clarify some of what was ambiguous in the original piece. Thanks…

  • Mark Uzick March 10, 2012, 10:17 am

    Mercurious: Mark, re your question about the nature of acceptance, the broad choice you present I agree with: Is it done from choice or necessity?

    Your answer to my question indicates that you misunderstood it, but it was a fine answer to a different question. I simply wanted to know why people more trusting of decentralized and small-scale approaches wouldn’t be less vulnerable to financial shocks; and then I speculated on what this paradox might imply.

    I just bailed on Chase Bank and a Bank of America credit card for two alternatives I know to be more acceptable for starters. What if everyone did that?

    That’s funny; I have two Chase credit cards that I use strictly on purchases where the cash back rebate is tripled or quintupled; both cards are on full auto-pay so I pay no interest or fees while Chase loses money on my purchases; both cards paid me $100 to sign up. I recently received a redundant offer of $250 to sign up for one of the cards, which Chase withdrew, but was surprised to find a courtesy bonus of $250 on my existing card for their mistake. If I cut my cards up, I’d be doing them a favor.

    You said me: We no longer get into fistfights with “libtards” or “repugnicans”…the very titles are meaningless in American politics today. I am trying every day to do this, not for a moral reason, not to keep the republic alive or to stick my thumb in Mr. Charlie’s eye. It’s just because the other road just plain doesn’t make sense any more and I’m tired of following it.

    You said to redwilldanaher: I also believe we make a huge mistake when our thinking invests these clowns with anywhere near the level of power I see attributed to them. Their very insolence makes them more vulnerable by the day. I am one of those people who doesn’t believe the financial system was blown up to advance an agenda…I think it blew up due to stupidity, greed, arrogance and opportunity. These are not gods, they are men with feet of clay in every sense. They are acting more rashly than ever before seen in my lifetime. That type of behavior begets resistance, in a way doing a better job of organizing freedom lovers than we could ever do by simple cheer leading.

    It seems that you are of two minds about how to engage with the world about us; there’s some truth in both thoughts, but the second one shows why there’s hope. It recognizes that, while civilization has its cycles, it’s come such a long way that it’s difficult for us to see how much better life has become; that each set back is not the end of civil order but only a small consolidation on the way to new highs. You were speaking of withdrawal from social life euphemistically as the noble suicide of the slave; yes, loss of hope is a kind of death; withdrawal should be used only strategically and sparingly.

  • Mercurious March 10, 2012, 8:23 am

    @ redwilldanaher: It goes without saying there are a lot of very good reasons to agree that we don’t have much room for optimism. Looking around, it seems like everything honest, decent and positive is being obliterated by a shard, a sliver of humanity who are in a position that enables them to decide the fate of millions. BUT…

    I also believe we make a huge mistake when our thinking invests these clowns with anywhere near the level of power I see attributed to them. Their very insolence makes them more vulnerable by the day. I am one of those people who doesn’t believe the financial system was blown up to advance an agenda…I think it blew up due to stupidity, greed, arrogance and opportunity. These are not gods, they are men with feet of clay in every sense. They are acting more rashly than ever before seen in my lifetime. That type of behavior begets resistance, in a way doing a better job of organizing freedom lovers than we could ever do by simple cheer leading.

    And when change comes, I expect it to be a quantum jump, change-of-state type of thing. I would not be looking for conditions that change so slowly that we can stay out in front of them. That’s also why I personally believe holding assets trending up over the long haul, unmargined and safely stored. On any given day we could wake up and the world could be a radically different place. We have to have solutions in place every day, to be ready for any day.

  • redwilldanaher March 9, 2012, 9:54 pm

    Really enjoyed your essay Merc but I’m not as optimistic that “we’ll” emerge better for the journey. The globalists seem to be knitting an ever tighter weave and the statist puppets at the helm here would like nothing better than to exert far more control over everything. They are doing it incrementally at the moment but a few staged events and the planned media coverage that will follow them are all that remains for far greater reach by “them” to be had. Hundreds of millions if not billions of people haven’t emerged better for the journey once these types of psychopaths have managed to assume full control if modern history can be submitted as evidence. The past few weeks have brought news that treats freedoms with disdain and nearly all of it came from the good ole USSA. My main issue with prepping and hunkering down, although it seems to be the best fall back plan IMO, is that you remain a sitting duck if not allied with like-minded and equipped folks that you can honestly call friends and neighbors and more importantly rely on at crucial times. God help us if the Zombies can’t get their various forms of Soylent Green from their benevolent industrial/government/media complex.

    • Mario cavolo March 10, 2012, 6:17 am

      Sociopathic socialism? Upon pondering, it’s an accurate description for a lot of what,s happening across The American system. Find me a leader who supports and acts in accordance with “of the people, ny the people, for the people.” It is even worse than that, the system is so far gone in the hands of a sociopathic self-serving elite few, that a person rising up on such a noble, simple and delightful platform is treated as an outcast. And even more worser (that was a joke) , common people actually think they are involved and engaged in it too! It’s the sheeple’s grand illusion And so he goes and “votes” or idiotically makes a $50 campaign contribution to and for the very same self-serving system bloodsuckers , some call them politicians, who have millions of dollars enjoying their politico “lifestyle”, in fact, whether they win or lose!

      For society as a whole its bad, while The doomed American middle-class consumers are left to concern themselves with what they really “need” to consume as
      their situation gets worse and worse. it’s easy to agree those consumption patterns will evolve.

      Cheers, Mario

  • John Jay March 9, 2012, 8:58 pm

    Steve,
    Yes, you got what I meant to say.
    No regular Army has landed on these shores since the War of 1812. My, that was exactly 200 years ago!
    But the MSM always drums up the war fever and everybody can’t wait to join up. A little less since Vietnam, but it still is ongoing. You can’t beat the system, so disengage and let the masses do what they do best, follow the leader. The USA I grew up in has faded away. It’s best to retreat to your own “Galt’s Gulch” and not try to stop the rising tide of insanity.

    • redwilldanaher March 9, 2012, 9:42 pm

      Absolutely.

  • Mercurious March 9, 2012, 8:50 pm

    Mark, re your question about the nature of acceptance, the broad choice you present I agree with: Is it done from choice or necessity? I say choice, which is the underlying theme of this piece and developed from a post I wrote a week or so ago.

    What do slaves do when they have lost all hope of freedom? The noble ones end their life, choosing death rather than continuing to serve evil. Sounds dramatic, but just another way of saying what John Jay alludes to above and the point I made in the previous post. Sometime, your last good move is just to choose not to go further. It doesn’t have to mean death, underground economy, or bartering necessarily. I just bailed on Chase Bank and a Bank of America credit card for two alternatives I know to be more acceptable for starters. What if everyone did that?

    Have we not, in reality, reached the point where our votes are meaningless? In Romney, Santorum and Obama (yes, I’m a Paulist but also a realist) we have a Pepsi challenge poured from the same can. We send Congress a million piece torrent of hate mail objecting to a bank bailout and they come up with $7 T over a long weekend for them. We manage to snag some techno bauble and it’s passe in six months. What’s the point. Isn’t life bigger than even high definition?

    IMHO, the absolute and most exquisite act of insurrection today is also the safest…and that is to withdraw your energy from the superstructure. You don’t have to go all Stone Age tribe to do it, either. Just CONSCIOUSLY choose what has value. When we do that, so much of the flotsam of merchandised reality falls away. We no longer get into fistfights with “libtards” or “repugnicans”…the very titles are meaningless in American politics today. I am trying every day to do this, not for a moral reason, not to keep the republic alive or to stick my thumb in Mr. Charlie’s eye. It’s just because the other road just plain doesn’t make sense any more and I’m tired of following it.

  • John Jay March 9, 2012, 3:42 pm

    Benjamin,
    I think you can make a separate peace with whatever insanity TPTB have created and stay out of the slaughterhouse. My favorite example from history is Mark Twain. After a brief experience as a Confederate soldier he said, screw this, and headed for the California gold fields. Unless you are Robert Oppenheimer I doubt one person will have much to add to the latest War those in charge are promoting as essential to the Nation. Every generation has it’s insanity pit, WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Gulf War, AfPakIraq. Everyone in power is a psychopath in my opinion, and they do not care in the least if millions die in a war, or if they bankrupt the entire planet. It all depends on what they are up to at the moment. By the time most people hit SS age, they have enough life experience to know family, friends and health are what counts and are happy to be left alone in their own little world. The .1% at the top, however, never tire of plotting and pulling strings. Rockefeller, Soros, Buffet, you know the ones.
    You can analyze the situation to death but the best course of action is to make things easy for yourself in my opinion.

    • Steve March 9, 2012, 8:16 pm

      JJ, thanks for standing behind those who have taken a Stand so that others walk free. Maybe if Twain had not run away there wouldn’t be democracy. Have Obama bind up his loins with body armor and bear arms like John Adams did while being transported to France and there will be few wars. Yet, that would require People to take a Stand and demand honesty of the officer in office. If ‘they’ want to War, then lead the arrow into battle. It’s pretty easy to push a button on a drone, or run to another country. Its not so easy for the starters of wars to lead with their flesh as Adams did. I’d bet that Obama, is full blown yellow in regard to leading a battle challenge against a real enemy, or standing to do anything alone. But, if the People would require this of their supposed CIC there would be far less killing of 18 year old kid Marines, and collateral damage ( easy word for baby killing). If I wrongly understand what you meant, then I say sorry in advance JJ. I try to understand how everyone wants everything and thinks there is no fiddler to pay.

  • Mark Uzick March 9, 2012, 2:19 pm

    Someone in a state of high agitation with less and less commitment to all present large systems, struggling to make ends meet with no relief in site, lacking the characteristic American optimism of the past, more trusting of decentralized and small-scale approaches, and less able to withstand further financial shocks yet more vulnerable than ever to experiencing them.

    You seem to be presenting a paradox here, but shouldn’t a paradox be explained? Are you saying that people who are more trusting of decentralization are so inclined, not because they will be living in a more decentralized, self sufficient manner, but because, having lost their autonomy and suffering under centralized planning, they will have become dependent upon living by their wits, navigating through an underground economy where securing their very survival is a “criminal” act?

  • mario cavolo March 9, 2012, 5:35 am

    Well done dive into a more vertical topic Mercurious…and kudos for “concomitant”

    By the way, speaking of consumption attitudes, the new Apple Ipad was released, my interest level was “uh, who cares”…retina huh what display?..4g…good grief…the useability of an ipad 2 and similiar other tablets is mighty fine.

    So, I wonder how many others out there might also be feeling that same kind of reaction, because its telling…

    Cheers, Mario

  • John Jay March 9, 2012, 5:14 am

    Mercurious,
    Many points well taken.
    The “Very Simple Lifestyle” is an obvious choice to enable one to disengage from the hate filled struggle to “Get Ahead”. As one boomer put it, his house and car are paid off, there is nothing he needs or wants to buy, and he is taking SS at 62. He said he does not intend to work 4 or 5 months out of the year to pay taxes on 12 months income.
    And, yes, APPL has built a huge profit making machine by catering to conspicuous consumption. Ditto for Oakley sunglasses, Michael Kors, YSL, Hermes, BMW etc. To each, his own indeed. I think the enlightened player withdraws from the rat race as soon as possible.

    • Benjamin March 9, 2012, 11:48 am

      “I think the enlightened player withdraws from the rat race as soon as possible.”

      I beg to differ on that, JJ. I’m going to be 36 this year and it’s been, gosh… Nearly eight years since I last drove a truck or followed through on that engineering degree that I had in mind. Prior to that course of action, my goal was medical school.

      So, why the many changes in direction, all leading to the same conclusion of bowing out? Was it inability? Laziness? A sense of entitlement (that the govt would take care of me, ie)? No. Quite simply, I’ve never been able to escape that feeling, nay vision, that the world was going increasingly insane and headed for disaster. And so it is today, more so than ever. Along the way, I’ve not been the typical American consumer.

      Am I enlightened? I used to sort of think so. But in retrospect, I was little more than a flickering candle flame in an ever growing darkness. I am no lucifer (light-bearer). Out of the rat-race, but into an audition line for a snuff film. Any view deviant from that one would be dishonest of me.

      Anyway, I view as one and the same that race and today’s article on positioning ones self in the insanity. I’m almost dumbstruck by the irony.

      @Mercurious: “…considers himself lucky to be old enough to remember when songs described now as classic rock were first released and to have discovered silver at $4.70.”

      Songs now described as classic rock… I know the feeling! $4.70 water? Regrettably, not.

  • SD1 March 9, 2012, 3:14 am

    Clean water? Tell that to the gold and silver mining industry.

  • Steve March 9, 2012, 12:56 am

    You got it absolutely correct on water Merc. The last piece is the brown stuff in a field, or the little white pellets coming from LNG and knowing how to make all that work.