An Elusive Bear Market Low in Natural Gas

Natural Gas futures were trading for around 3.58 in November when we projected a possible bear-market low at $2.30. Imagine our excitement when, ten days ago, on January 23, the March futures contract trampolined from within exactly 1.6 cents of our target, shattering the despair and deathly calm of a relentless, multiyear sinking spell that had not seen respite since last spring. The initial leap was enormous, to 2.63, and anyone who bought down around the target would have reaped a $3400 profit per contract on the first day of the move. We had prepared subscribers for a potentially tradable bounce, reiterating our contrary stance on January 12 with this advice:  The futures were barely able to muster a dead-cat bounce on that last effort.  Even so, the 2.305 will remain a good place to try bottom-fishing aggressively with our habitual penny-ante stop-loss. At the time, the futures had been falling, falling, falling, but they were still well above our target, trading around 2.80. However, the next week saw them plunge, kamikaze-style, precisely to the Hidden Pivot support where we had anticipated a turn.

In tracking our own recommendations, we never assume subscribers are making money merely because a trade that we advised triggered. In this case, a subscriber reported in the Rick’s Picks chat room (click here to access this 24/7 service free for a week) that he had indeed bought some contracts at the 2.30 target. And so we established a “tracking position” to guide him and any other subscribers who had caught the low.  In the ensuing days, the steep rally continued, peaking on January 26 at $2.84. At that point, each contract purchased would have racked up gains of about $5400 before commissions. We advised partial-profit taking that effectively reduced the cost basis on the 25% of the position remaining to 2.12 per contract. And then we sat back and waited for a fabulous new bull market to unfold in natural gas. The chart above tells what happened next, and you don’t need to be a trader or technician to see that bulls got suckered again. Which is not to say Rick’s Picks bulls lost money.  On Tuesday, just before the futures dove anew, we advised exiting the remainder of the position if it traded down to 2.39.  This it did, and then some. In theory, this gambit would have produced a theoretical profit of $2700 for traders who followed our advice from beginning to end.

As for natural gas, although the March contract has yet to breach the January 23 low, we would not lay odds that it will hold. Technical considerations aside, the vague impression one gets is that the bear market in this useful, clean but difficult to transport fuel will never end. As traders, however, because we know that this cannot possibly be so, we will continue to look for the elusive opportunity that could reward our efforts spectacularly.

***

(If you’d like to have these commentaries delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)

  • Chris T. February 4, 2012, 12:12 am

    “…other then survival necessities”

    Well, I guess that means Apple is still a hold, if not a buy, because many many iPhoners out there would rather go naked, if not starve, before parting with their next gen toy!

    I think you’re Greek comment is prob. on point, but somehow the notion that MF was used as a hit on those planning on removing gold and silver from the warehouses, is appealing. It’s not as though they are not aware of what Ted Butler or Antal Fekete have been saying, and it is something they have to keep from happening for as long as they possibly, and no matter how criminlly that is, they can.
    It isn’t after all just the Comex or LBMA warehouses, it probably also includes the SLV and GLD, and perhaps much of unallocated storage, ex. at the Perth Mint and so on…..

  • Paul February 3, 2012, 7:20 am

    MF Global came down when the banksters decided not to pay off on the Greek debt insurance they issued by declaring “a 50% write-off was not a default”.

    What brokerage firms will be coming down next week when the banksters decide not to pay off on their Greek debt insurance by declaring “a 75% write-off is not a default”.

    After the Greek election in a few months Greece will likely renounce 100% of their debt.

    So tell me … how are the big American banks that sold all the debt default insurance going to justify that “a 100% debt write-off is not a default”???

    If they can’t lie anymore and must pay off on the insurance … then all the big American banks are going to declare bankruptcy.

    To prevent such a “bank holiday” from unfolding Bernanke will have to print up an additional 100 trillion dollars and hand it out quickly to his bankster buddies to keep the Ponzi banking scheme going.

    The explosive fiat money printing that will be required will create hyper-inflation followed by a contracting economy (for as prices increase spending on anything other then survival necessities will decrease).

    We will have price inflation and economic contraction at the same time.

  • Chris T. February 3, 2012, 12:17 am

    About the MF posts above and yesterday’s reference to the FOFOA article:

    Those “conpsiracy theories” about MF Global appear more true the more one hears about the depravity of it all.
    Gerald Celente’s case is illustrative:
    He was one of those only intending to take delivery, and it is EXACTLY those market particitpants that needed to be driven out by hook or by crook.

    What better way than to make this “Lehman” for insiders be the one to show these people who is/intends to remain boss.

    I think Sinclair is by far to nice. All he says is true, but that this was more than just a consequences of this fractional-everything market, seems the case also.

    They screwed the Hunt’s thirty years ago, and even with all the lessons learned from that, such as Celente, they found a way.

    The proof that this was in inside hit to kill those wishing to “dry out” the warehouses, will be seen when Corzine gets away with it it, either scot-free, or something of a slap on the wrist.
    Then we’ll know.

    BTW: The company name may actually have been chosen with the same chutzpah that Freddie Mercury, in his pre-“out” days showed when naming his rock band.
    Corzine was just providing the future name he know he would be cursed with once he got done screwing his clients…

  • Dale Pence February 2, 2012, 7:57 pm

    Last week’s “key reversal” on the daily chart is an early technical clue that natural gas prices have bottomed. Nat Gas will likely trend sideways to higher over the summer months, but commercial end-users of natural gas or propane, would do well to consider locking in these 10-year low price levels for needs well into the future.

    The market tested last weeks lows at 6:00 PM last night, coming within a penny of the low, and has now rebounded more than 10%. Looks like bottoming action to me.

  • nonplused February 2, 2012, 6:15 pm

    You might have your low in the futures market (although I doubt it), but spot is going to trash this summer, possibly $1.50. I could see day gas trade negative in Alberta on a couple of days due to pipeline pressures (balancing). Storage is full, we are making 5 bcf/d more than average demand, and there is an inventory of 10,000 wells that aren’t even completed yet! And they are still drilling, because they are hedged! (Not that that makes any sense, but that’s how energy companies think.) This is going to take a while to work off.

    • John Jay February 2, 2012, 8:10 pm

      Plus a very mild winter back east so far this year keeping demand way down for NG and heating oil.
      My brother is happy his fuel oil tank is staying full instead of draining night and day to keep the house warm. I guess they can export heating oil to Europe instead, and gouge those poor people. The sun never sets on the Oligarch empire!

  • Rick Ackerman February 2, 2012, 5:54 pm

    Yeah, well, I guess Pennaluna is as good as it gets, safety-wise. But should we be comforted by the fact that they are regulated by the same hacks who regulated Bernie Madoff? Or that their accounts are ‘backstopped’ by SIPC, which, in the aftermath of a panic, might have enough ‘real’ money to pay off 0.004% of claims?

    I don’t doubt that Pennaluna thinks of itself as the safest of the safe. But their attitude puts one in mind of the old saw: “If you can keep a cool head while those around your are panicking, then you probably don’t understand the problem.” I think they have greatly underestimated not only the size and scope of the problem, but the very nature of it. Recall that the Titanic’s builders were certain it was unsinkable.

  • D. Barber February 2, 2012, 9:54 am

    OOPS,
    That won’t work.

  • D. Barber February 2, 2012, 9:46 am

    Hope this link is acceptable to Rick.
    The MF Global scandal has shaken many investors and left them worried about the safety of
    the entire financial system.
    http://secure.penntrade.com/SafetyofAccounts.pdf

  • Onoiro February 2, 2012, 8:37 am

    Dear Rick Ackerman,

    I am very intrigued by your hidden pivot method however as a former MF Global client who do you use as a broker, who can you trust?

    • Rick Ackerman February 2, 2012, 5:56 pm

      See my response below to Barber’s link.

  • SD1 February 2, 2012, 7:13 am

    Cam, Rick makes a number of truly amazing calls, as you undoubtedly know. Detractors neither understand risk nor reward. Rick understands both.

  • Cam fitzgerald February 2, 2012, 5:07 am

    That was a truly amazing call Rick. Nicely done.