[Back in July, Cam Fitzgerald asserted here in a guest editorial that policymakers would eventually succeed in stabilizing the global financial system, triggering a huge bull market in stocks. He also asserted that commodities and precious metals would not participate in the rally. In the essay below, Cam shouts “I told you so!” Readers may find themselves disagreeing, however, especially since precious metals have shown signs of life in recent days. RA]
“Remember you read this. I am right, and I know it.” Those haughty words were my parting shot when I responded to comments about a guest essay I’d written here in July, “Commodity Bear Says 2012 Election Holds Key.” I had gone out on a limb, expressing my honest opinions that day and the next without a shred of doubt showing under my wrinkled shirt. It was my vision of the future. Commodities were going to fall along with gold, while stocks, particularly blue chips and defensives, would rise sharply in the months ahead. Not satisfied with that prediction, I dug a deeper hole for myself. There would be no QE3, I stated. Commodity speculation had already brought us to the brink of a new recession. Ben Bernanke would not make the mistake of trying that approach again. Instead, I asserted, policy tools would be employed to jump-start the recovery we needed, and this time it would not cost billions to achieve. At the heart of these efforts were the odds that some strategic efforts would pay dividends in improving the electoral chances of the president.
I wondered at the time whether I’d regret my boldness. The responses that followed overwhelmingly rejected my theory. The local crowd dumped on me with glee. Mob rules. “Who are you going to position yourself with, Jim Rogers or Cam Fitzgerald?” one forum regular shot back ruthlessly. “No offence Cam, but only one of you two can ever say, “I am right, and I know it.” And it ain’t you.” “But it is me,” I answered meekly in a follow up post. I barely got through reading the 40 negative responses, and then I stopped posting on Rick’s site. In the weeks that followed, though, most of my predictions were actually coming true. As August wore on into September, I got some redemption when gold fell off a cliff and margin calls drove it lower still. And so I finally returned to that old article last week and read it again for the second time. What had I said that got the crowd so irritated, I wondered? Was it my cockiness, or just the arrogance of going against the wisdom of the crowd?
A Little of Both
A little of both, probably. The suggestion that the Government and the Fed might engineer a recovery, if only commodity prices could be knocked down and the speculative fever chilled was just too much for Rick’s regulars. The idea that politics could be behind it was outrageous (are you people all sheltered or something?). It suggested a conspiracy, when all I was alluding to were the use of legitimate policy tools. I could easily imagine that political will could enact measures to blow the froth off oil prices for example, exactly as we had just seen with the release of millions of barrels of oil from the Strategic Oil Reserve in June. So later that day in July I wrote more specifically: “There is no question whatsoever in my mind that policy tools and the cooperation of governing bodies can put a deliberate chill on speculative forces in the markets in order to achieve an outcome that does not consume untold billions of tax dollars or require more easing to institute. I believe that is exactly what is about to unfold”. And it did. Then we got The Twist instead of QE3.
By now, most of you will also be familiar with the position limits that regulators have recently approved covering all 28 commodity categories of the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Three Democrats versus two Republicans on the commission carried the day. If that does not tell you that efforts are under way to reign in speculative forces, then nothing will. Do not doubt that pressures will be brought to bear when the stakes are so high. We need stimulus but we also need to prevent outbursts of commodity price growth, and so pressure is being brought to bear right on the source, in the CFTC itself. Furthermore, the margin calls on Gold and Silver that were brought into play exactly at the moment those two commodities were in decline should not really have been a surprise (despite shocking many old timers). Few could recall such actions taking place during a price decline.
Anti-Fiat Outlaws
This, I believe, is part and parcel of the same program designed to flatten bullishness in that trade and discourage some of the excess speculative fever. I will add that as a secondary goal it sent a shock wave through the gold camp and silenced some of those voices which were at the forefront of negativity when discussions of the dollar or recovery came up. I could not have been more pleased. That small band of anti-fiat outlaws representing a tiny fraction of the investing population were responsible for the vast majority of negative commentary that I saw daily on many websites. Shutting them up for a while came as a happy relief.
Anyway, my original argument was merely that by reducing commodity-induced inflation threats, that discretionary spending could rise and thus assist in bringing about a recovery. Speculation was taxing our disposable income at exactly the wrong moment and harming chances of a recovery. Evidently, some in positions of authority agreed with that assertion, even if Rick’s crowd did not. If every attempt to resuscitate the economy resulted in a backfire from a commodity price explosion, then policymakers would have to deal directly with that issue before proceeding further. That smelled all too conspiratorial to most here, though, and suggested the powers that be really had the ability to change the trajectory of the markets.
Joined at the Hip
Well, of course they do, notwithstanding.one forum argument that went as follows: “Commodities and stocks have been joined at the hip for 4 years. How are ‘they’ going to kill commodities while the stock market soars? If the dollar rallies and commodities tank, I have to think stocks will tumble too.” And so they did, before staging a stunning comeback this past two weeks that took most people by surprise, even as commodities lagged. Nor should it seem so weird that the dollar rocketed recently while commodities plunged. Nobody saw that coming. I keep reading that same refrain on many sites, yet it is plain wrong. Many saw the dollar rise coming and gold falling. I was one of them.
In fact, only two short weeks passed before my first prediction began to rock a few of the crustier boats. Oil fell off a cliff, copper tanked and shortly thereafter gold took a face-plant in the dirt that is now recognized as one of the most severe drops in decades. The dollar meanwhile shot higher to gasps of “this cannot be happening!” So how manly was that?
Retirees Have Retreated
Not to be outdone by myself, I had also claimed blue chips and defensives would soon rise, leading all markets higher. I hope you have been watching the daily charts. That is exactly what is taking place and while the dollar is now in modest decline versus the euro this week, that claim has not failed to achieve climax and satisfaction. There has been a tremendous shift in sentiment amongst serious investors in the past few months. Dividend stocks of our best companies are seen as solid cash sources and a better option than so-called secure bond offerings and Treasurys at near-zero interest rates. High yield and junk bonds have lost their appeal except for the most savvy risk-oriented professionals. Retirees meanwhile have retreated to cash and bank certificates paying less than the rate of inflation. That has left the field wide open and markets rose on thin trading as bulls took control and bears covered like mad.
The world awaits a real European financial solution meanwhile that will almost certainly be inflationary and far reaching. Markets are already pricing that in even as the notion of QEIII is quietly being suggested in the background. You all know how this will end I hope? The big guns meanwhile are getting positioned to protect themselves from the reality that Europe is indeed much deeper in debt and much more in trouble than even the business media acknowledges. They know that the only real solution at this late stage is to print Euros, monetize debts and thus bring about a serious devaluation of the currency. With it comes a lower living standard, less ice cream and fewer holidays abroad. It can be no other way. The smart money knows it, but we will likely see a real crisis before those events happen.
Euro Cannot Fail
The euro meanwhile will not fail because it cannot fail. It is after all the prototype for a global currency and still in its formative stages where the mechanics of making a single currency function between a group of differing nations is still in the developmental process. They have merely encountered their first major snag but it is becoming clear Europe will find a resolution to its issues despite the negativity expressed towards their actions to date. On that note, Euro Bonds are certainly not out of the question in the medium term nor is the idea that extra powers be granted the ECB to directly monetize debt in much doubt as I see it. The major member states may have ruled it out for the moment but those options will be returning in good time if major debt restructuring is the only choice remaining. Greece meanwhile will remain a part of the Union. They are going to default but it will be with the assistance of the collective of nations and a fresh new haircut. Betting on a Euro failure meanwhile is very bad bet to make. The resolve exists to find solutions and we will just have to be patient as the idea evolves further over time and grows.
We never did get QE3, as I’d predicted. Check. We got the Twist instead and this surely falls under the heading of policy tools as no money is actually printed or bleeding into the wider economy. This program amounts to a swap and it is achieving its stated goal with flying colors. Markets rose on the news. Were you surprised? Across the pond in Europe, Timothy Geithner has been strongly promoting a leveraged (EFSF) European Financial Stability Fund to head off a financial crisis there and he is getting his way despite being rebuffed early on. Indeed, I read tonight that leverage will take the fund to just over a Trillion Euro, about half what most wanted. Simultaneously he has mounted pressure on China to float the Yuan and received support from within the House to bring on trade sanctions if China does not cut the Yuan free. More policy. Improves the chances of an Obama re-election too as some blame for our current troubles have shifted outside our borders. It may be cynical but it is effective.
China Relented
And then right out of the blue a week or so back China relented somewhat and boosted the Yuan by the largest single increase in many years while Nicholas Sarkozy and Angela Merkel nearly simultaneously announced a confident plan to rescue European banks was in the works. Policy led efforts of the Treasury with regards to China and Europe have in fact been effective on both fronts. We are seeking a dollar devaluation here at home in the longer term and so a strong Europe benefits us as does a strengthening Yuan. Check and check.
Consumer spending is up meanwhile and is improving as the dollar has strengthened simultaneous to commodity price declines. Recent retail figures have surprised to the upside. Consumption, although tepid has been rising for many months. Disposable income is also increasing. This is benefiting the economy now and leading to the first real signs of improvement as discretionary spending is seen as key to renewed confidence. This usually leads to better sentiment readings although we still await better news on that front.
Bull Market Coming
So what is coming next? One hell of a bull market, that is what, and it has already begun. I hope you took my advice of July 7. You would be sitting pretty already and sweetly basking in the afterglow that only comes from a close brush with a bouquet of fresh greenbacks. You might well have been watching for a good opportunity to short Gold and then seen that perfect double top when it appeared.
In the meantime, we are about to go seriously inflationary. I am having trouble squaring this with some of my past remarks though as the Tea Leaves get a fresh look. Many of you will know me as a hard core deflationist (with a near pathological loathing for the hyperinflation camp). How was I going to reconcile my new inflationary beliefs with what I was actually seeing without violating my past principles and views though? That was the rub. With comment layered upon comment, I had trapped myself into a single way of thinking. On a daily more personal basis I found myself resorting to finding excuses to blow off the evidence that kept emerging to the contrary. Reading Chuck Cohen’s piece yesterday gave me fresh energy though and renewed my conviction to just let the past slide. The funny thing was I have been seeing many of the same things he was discussing but have been unwilling to articulate that since my piece back in July brought such a backlash. My arguments from that time are supportive of an inflationary outcome.
Why We Dump a Dog
I guess we need to allow ourselves more flexibility. Investing demands we change course when we know we have made mistakes or the environment has changed to alter our earlier decisions. That is why we dump a dog that we know is a losing bet instead of holding on and going down with it. And that is why I have modified my deflationist views to accept that inflation is going to be a big part of our future. There is no other way.
And so my last comment is saved for Brad, who shot back after reading my overconfident claims “One thing I have noticed over the years is that statements like [yours]…tend to humble people. Let’s wait and see”. Indeed. Glad you waited, Brad. I am humbled. But allow me this small indulgence…….I told you so.
***
(If you’d like to have Rick’s Picks commentary delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)
HI Cam, I’m jumping in late….
Will you be coming to China as mentioned earlier?…Would enjoy catching up, you can email contact me through my website, don’t want to put my email here as spammer robots seek and find…
I appreciate your comments, I agreed with you through the summer if you recall that I also sensed that “they” can’t keep pushing all prices up, for stocks to continue up, commodities prices would need to come down and that is exactly what happened. I’m not as sure as you whether this upward move in stocks will continue or is a bear market rally, however I appreciate your article and points.
You know that I have written many articles for Rick more related to similar issues with a China-centric point of view and I think you are writing with a bit of defensiveness and arrogance that you don’t need to position yourself with.
I’ve always submitted my feature articles to Rick knowing and expecting that the purpose is to debate its contents. A professional author and friend once said to me “a book is your argument” .
The point of an article is to create, build and argue an approach. For myself especially, I know that on the subject of China of which American’s compared to any other country are more ignorant, misguided, arrogant and biased than virtually any other subject that I can think of. However, I let the argument flow and intelligently respond with realistic facts. I admit a few times I have gotten too emotional too, I think one time I bruskly asked Robert if he was “on ludes” (sorry Robert…:) Other people who write rudely, don’t even deserve a reply except if you can superbly, precisely tear them to shreds with razor sharp reality…
Enjoy the arguing in the spirit of intelligent, sparring arguing and know we will both give and take a few blows along the way…that’s why we’re here and Rick does a fine job of creating that venue here in my opinion…
Cheers, Mario