Inflationists and their crackpot theories took another pounding yesterday on news that home prices had plummeted at a record pace –19 percent since last January. Residential real estate values have now fallen by 30 percent nationwide since peaking in 2006. In trying to reverse this trend, the Fed would appear not to have gotten much bang for its buck, since the central bank has committed an estimated $11 trillion already, targeted mainly at large mortgage lenders. Success is certain to become even more elusive after New York City’s real estate market implodes, as it soon will. The last time the Big Apple was seriously on the ropes, President Gerald Ford told the city to drop dead. What will Mr. Obama tell them? And, will the Daily News still be around to report it so memorably?
Concerning the rampant inflation that nearly all mainstream economists expect, we would ask these dismal scientists to predict exactly where it is most likely to surface. Will real estate values finally catch fire again, pushing tract homes into the billion-dollar range? Will a dozen eggs cost $90. Will assembly line workers at Ford negotiate a package worth $300 an hour? Will college tuitions quadruple in the next few years? Of course not. Where would the money come from? Surely not from wages, since the businesses that would pay them are doing well merely to survive these days. And not from a massive credit binge either, since the only collateral we could use to borrow up another storm is…our homes. Why can’t economists see this? And why can’t they understand that the deeper taxpayers go into hock to “stimulate” the economy, the more drag there will be on future growth?
Only Hyper-Inflation Is Logical
To be clear, let us note that hyper-inflation seems entirely possible, even if mere inflation does not. Hyperinflation will arrive when The Government decides that fiscal stimulus alone cannot ever get us out of debt, given the vast sums of debt that need to be inflated away. No, only a hyperinflation could do the job, albeit at a price that presently seems much too high. Creditors and savers would be wiped out, life insurance policies would become worthless, pension funds would be devastated, and all of the institutional conduits of lending, including the bond markets, would cease to function for a generation.
If you think the decisions Mr. Obama is making now are tough, wait till he figures out that America’s multi-trillion-dollar boondoggle is barely causing a ripple in the economy, much less the kind of boom that would make our debts manageable.
(If you’d like to have Rick’s Picks commentary delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)
It seems that essential items, like food and fuel, would increase in price due to scarcity from decreased global trade. But, if the US dollar collapses 30 or 50 percent, like when it no longer becomes the world reserve currency, wouldn’t sellers (automakers, car dealerships, homebuilders, etc.) have to raise the prices of even cars or houses maybe 30 to 50 percent to compensate for receiving devalued dollars?
Also, if the US government deliberately creates hyperinflation, wouldn’t that wipe out the bank reserves of those too-big-to-fail banks? Why would those elite US bankers let the US government create hyperinflation if those bankers would also lose all their US dollar bank reserves? It seems that hyperinflation is a possibility, but it would be finincial suicide even for the influential elite US bankers.
Also, if hyperinflation is inevitable, then trying to save US dollars in a 401K or other retirement account is unnecessary as it would all be lost eventually.
Trying to think practically, should someone buy a house or car before the US dollar collapses, or will those prices keep deflating even after a US dollar collapse? Should someone keep contributing to a retirement account- or is hyperinflation (wipe out)inevitable?
There is a lot of theory, but more guidance and examples are requested about the practical (everyday life) application of theory.