Microsoft’s Slow Death

I spent three hours online Friday with the Geek Squad’s best and brightest, attempting without success to fix two seemingly minor problems in Microsoft Outlook. The first is that Outlook has been forgetting the password every time it checks my e-mail server. This problem has been intermittent over the more than ten years I’ve used Outlook, a nettlesome glitch that has survived all versions, updates and security patches. Although there are thousands of web pages that purport to deal with the issue, and presumably tens of millions of PC users who have sought to resolve it, I’ve yet to find a fix. Although Outlook on a bad day duns users with endless “Remember this password?” prompts, it would be easier to teach an Irish Setter to remember the date of your wedding anniversary. Particularly maddening is that the prompts continue to pop up every three seconds, even when one keeps instructing Outlook to “Remember this password”. My other Outlook  problem is that a feature designed to test the e-mail account settings has stopped working. Activate a test and it simply locks up Outlook so that the program becomes unusable. The only way to get past this bug – until the next time — is to reboot the computer.

At the end of Friday’s tech-support marathon, Chris, a Geek Squad expert with a five-star rating, offered the same, useless suggestion that tech support personnel have been offering PC users for decades: reinstall Windows.  They do this, of course, knowing full well that it takes someone who knows his way around computers the better part of a weekend to do a complete reinstall, and the user another two or three weeks to re-install all of the third-party applications that get wiped out in the process.

A Thousand Layers of Buggy Code

I mention all of this because it buttresses a prediction I’ve repeated here many times before – that Microsoft as a company is destined for failure.  The Redmond behemoth seems well along this path not merely because of management’s breathtaking ineptitude, lack of vision and obliviousness to the needs of customers, but also because Windows has accumulated layer upon layer of buggy code atop an architecture that was never meant to handle a thousand patches, updates and iterations. How bad has Windows become?  So bad, in fact, that the latest version, Windows 8, has almost single-handedly killed off the PC business. With tablets on their way to becoming ubiquitous, PC and laptop sales were already falling sharply. The last thing in the world that Dell, Hewlett-Packard, ASUS, Lenovo et al. needed was a new version of Windows that almost no one wanted or needed.

There are so many gratutious changes in Windows 8’s interface, most of them geared toward touch-screen users, that system administrators and PC users have effectively boycotted the product rather than subject themselves to yet another time-wasting slog up the learning curve.  Microsoft, reacting with understandably little fanfare, has promised to ameliorate the global flop of this latest release with a new version of the O/S called Windows Blue. In the meantime, Windows 8 can only continue to garner negative press and the hostility of users everywhere. It were as though General Motors had introduced a jazzy new Chevy that lacked a “traditional” steering wheel, had a radio that played only hip-hop music, and brake and accelerator pedals whose positions were reversed.

‘A Lot of Ruin in an Empire’

To be sure, it is taking GM a very long time to go out of business, and the company has been in far worse shape than Microsoft for nearly two generations. There is a lot of ruin in an empire, as the saying goes.  In the case of Microsoft, with more spare cash than it knows how to deploy and an all but impregnable monopoly on PC operating systems, there is little hope that the company’s demise will come nearly as swiftly as deserved. But it seems inevitable nonetheless, since no company that does as many things – does everything – as badly as Microsoft can survive indefinitely.  Perhaps they will be pushed off the cliff by some paradigm-changing application-in-the-cloud that makes the Office suite superfluous?  It’s also possible that PCs will continue on a long grind toward obsolescence as tablets and other devices grow more powerful and capable. Until then, unfortunately, non-Mac users will have to grin and bear it whenever a three-hour tech support session leads, as they do more and more frequently these days, to a dead-end.

Unfortunately for Microsoft, it doesn’t have a Steve Jobs to turn the company around. Bill Gates, who couldn’t innovate his way out of a Glad bag, is ill-suited to this task, and summoning him out of retirement to “fix” Microsoft would be like calling on Jimmy Carter, or channeling the Millard Fillmore, to fix all that is wrong with America. Perhaps Steve Ballmer could not even be dislodged at this point, even by Gates. Ballmer has shown a steady hand in guiding Microsoft from one embarrassing failure to the next, and in elevating mediocrity to a civilizational pinnacle. It therefore seems fitting that he should preside over the world’s largest purveyor of software at a time when the economic system itself has very nearly been asphyxiated by businesses deemed “too big to fail.”

  • Carls May 14, 2013, 4:28 am

    Stop complaining about Windows 8 like a 5 year old. I have two Windows 8 computers, one is a laptop. All you do is install a 3rd party start button and it is as navigable as Windows 7 and looks like it. Win8 is better at deploying memory than Win7. Both my Win8 computers have 6gb of memory. Those tiles you see are very good for tablet users but are easily side stepped for laptops and desktops with a 3rd party start button like Start8 http://www.stardock.com/products/start8/

    Be careful with Microsoft. They have a new very slick graphical look across their spectrum including the new slick Outlook Mail, MS websites, tablets and the Win8 operating system. They can snarl back and bite you. Maybe the lure of Apple is too strong so you throw money at a problem. IMO the MS/Intel/Dell complex is very aware of what Apple is doing. Has copied many of their best ideas and is very strong. You can leave out Dell if want. Microsoft and Intel are doing very well with Samsung and other partners at extending battery life and light weight portability for laptops as in ultrabooks.

    &&&&

    Maybe MicroCrap should put you out on the sales floor? RA

  • Marc Authier May 14, 2013, 2:29 am

    Any Monopoly deserve to be destroyed and die and Microsoft deserves to die. Return to mean would be indeed to completely eliminate this filthy Monopoly with it anti-competitive quasi mafioso business practices. I cant wait seing Microsoft being wiped out.

    • John Jay May 14, 2013, 3:38 am

      Want to see MSFT wiped out?
      Me too, but sadly, it will never happen.
      The fix was in a long time ago, probably starting with the Powell Memorandum, way back in 1971, when Corporate America got religion and started big time lobbying to take over the government.
      Link: http://tinyurl.com/9jqa56a
      Walmart, ATT, Verizon, C, BAC, etc.all government approved monopolies.
      And it’s no accident, it’s been Government Policy for decades!

  • Rawdoglet May 14, 2013, 2:27 am

    You have bad administrators… that’s it. Anyone that knows what they are doing with Microsoft Exchange Server (Outlook’s Backend) knows how to properly configure it so that these authentication “pop ups” do not happen. It is either you or your administrators. It is MOST DEFINATELY not the technology as it has been rock solid for more than a decade.

  • Dave May 13, 2013, 11:05 pm

    Rick, since you mentioned using Outlook for 10 years, you need to move to The Cloud and web based access! This will allow you to access your Outlook e-mail from a web interface w/o having to deal with the software based Outlook and all its inherited bugs. Though you still can use it.

    Microsoft is discontinuing software installed free Hotmail and forcing users to move to Outlook.com which is web based. While I was avoiding the upgrade to the very last minute, I did it today. So, now I have dual Outlook.com and Hotmail access to my email until they discontinue support for Hotmail. You can use this web interface to access your email and stay with the Microsoft style you know and love! 😉

    First, create a Microsoft Account. This is the new name for Windows Live ID. Your ID can be used for various Microsoft services, Xbox, Skydrive, etc.

    http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows-live/sign-in-what-is-microsoft-account

    https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?bk=1368477331&ru=https://login.live.com/login.srf%3flc%3d1033%26mkt%3dEN-US&uiflavor=web&mkt=EN-US&lc=1033&lic=1

    Then, when you have your Outlook.com screen up, click on the upper right wheel tool and choose More Mail Settings.

    Then under Managing your account, choose Your email accounts….

    Then choose Add a send-and-receive account

    Enter your email address, password of your existing Outlook email account, then click Advanced options…

    Fill in your POP3 and/or SMTP email servers info, that your webmaster/ISP provider (zendisk, blue..) can provide. Then click Next…

    Your email account should now be available to access from Outlook.com.

    So by using the web based Outlook.com interface to access your current email account, you avoid using the antiquated software installed Outlook and its propagation of bugs.

    Hopefully this solves or works-around your problem.

    Dave

    • Cam Fitzgerald May 15, 2013, 8:35 am

      That is all great until the “cloud” becomes public Dave. Ever tried to remove anything once it was placed there?

  • Rich May 13, 2013, 9:00 pm

    Speaking of GM and MSFT:

    At a computer expo (COMDEX), Bill Gates reportedly compared the computer industry with the auto industry and stated:

    “If GM had kept up with the technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving
    $25.00 cars that got 1,000 miles to the gallon.”

    In response to Bill’s comments, General Motors issued a press release stating:

    “If GM had developed technology like Microsoft, we would all be driving cars with the following characteristics:-

    l. For no reason whatsoever, your car would crash twice a day.

    2. Every time they repainted the lines in the road, you would have to buy a new car.

    3. Occasionally your car would die on the freeway for no reason. You would have to pull over to the side of the road, close all of the car windows, shut it off, restart it, and reopen the windows before you could continue. For
    some reason you would simply accept this.

    4. Occasionally, executing a maneuver such as a left turn would cause your car to shut down and refuse to restart, in which case you would have to reinstall
    the engine.

    5. Only one person at a time could use the car unless you bought “CarNT”, but then you would have to buy more seats.

    6. Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, was reliable, five times as fast and twice as easy to drive – but would only run on five percent
    of the roads.
    [And this five percent thing — even IF true — would be
    a genuine problem unless you are content to work just the _best_ games and otherwise merely do productive and fun things such as e-mail, surf the web,
    spread sheets, cd/dvd burns, OCR, capturing audio and video, photo manipulation, page layout, web development, video production, remote
    wireless cyber connection… you get the picture!

    We DO love our Macintoshes!]

    7. The oil, water temperature, and alternator warning lights would all be replaced by a single “General Protection Fault” warning light.

    8. New seats would force everyone to have the same sized butt.

    9. The airbag system would ask “are you SURE?” before deploying.

    10. Occasionally, for no reason whatsoever, your car would lock you out and refuse to let you in until you simultaneously lifted the door handle, turned
    the key and grabbed hold of the radio antenna.

    11. GM would require all car buyers to also purchase a deluxe set of Rand McNally road maps (now a GM subsidiary), even though they neither need
    nor want them. Attempting to delete this option would immediately cause the car’s performance to diminish by 50% or more. Moreover, GM would become a
    target for investigation by the Justice Dept.

    12. Every time GM introduced a new car, car buyers would have to learn to drive all over again because none of the controls would operate in the same manner as
    the old car.

    13. You’d have to press the “Start” button to turn the engine off.

    MSFT Founders:

    http://www.earthlyissues.com/images/microsoft_founders.jpg

    Worth recalling Bill Gates, who called himself a coder, son of a Planned Parenthood Director, used foundation funds for population control vaccines with lethal side effects, did not write MS-DOS for IBM, but bought it as QDOS from Seattle Computer Works, then hired away the programmer Tim Patterson for exclusive rights a month before IBM made him and Paul Allen multi-Billionaires.

    Outlook and MSFT non-starters as slow byzantine memory-hogging software with backdoors…

    • gary leibowitz May 13, 2013, 9:29 pm

      The big different between GM and MSFT was the fact the GM had major competitors that “forced” them to adapt or die. They almost died. MSFT is still king of the PC. I suspect the PC will die before they relinquish their title.

    • John Jay May 14, 2013, 3:23 am

      Rich,
      I saw a “Nova” or “Frontline” show on the history of the PC, I believe Bill Gates paid a grand sum of $50,000 for the original OS that got MSFT off the ground.
      And that Bill Gate’s mom was friends with some IBM big shot and she got him in the door there.
      Kind of like all those old 60s and 70s Rockers that sold off the rights to their entire body of work for peanuts and lived to eternally regret it.
      You never know what something will be worth in the long run!

  • gary leibowitz May 13, 2013, 8:02 pm

    Microsoft is an old tech giant for sure. It is also way behind the times on innovation, and always late to the party. That being said I wouldn’t write them off just yet. They still have lots of money to burn and a lot of “smart” acquisitions to make. The demise of the PC has not happened yet but the writing is on the wall. Mr. Dell got it right when he wanted to get rid of the companies core business. I look at IBM and see an old tech company adapting very well with the new rapid changes.

    I have doubts that Microsoft can make the same transition. At this stage I will not be betting against them. Windows 8 is not a bad operating system. They needed to change their format if they wanted to enter the mobile arena. As an investment I would place them on ignore. I see no compelling reason to go long or short at this moment.

  • hgary leibowitz May 13, 2013, 8:01 pm

    Microsoft is an old tech giant for sure. It is also way behind the times on innovation, and always late to the party. That being said I wouldn’t write them off just yet. They still have lots of money to burn and a lot of “smart” acquisitions to make. The demise of the PC has not happened yet but the writing is on the wall. Mr. Dell got it right when he wanted to get rid of the companies core business. I look at IBM and see an old tech company adapting very well with the new rapid changes.

    I have doubts that Microsoft can make the same transition. At this stage I will not be betting against them. Windows 8 is not a bad operating system. They needed to change their format if they wanted to enter the mobile arena. As an investment I would place them on ignore. I see no compelling reason to go long or short at this moment.

  • Buster May 13, 2013, 6:18 pm

    Humanity’s slow death:
    A little belated, but I think it’s worth mentioning, & as far as I can find out, this is legit. Apparently, Israel has exploded a >1 kiloton nuclear bomb on Syria last week. The media blackout is supposedly to make Syria look like the aggressor in any retaliation.
    “… Israel has cancelled all schools tomorrow (May 5th)and told all people to stay home from work in case Syria attacks back. The Aleppo airport has been completely obliterated.”

    http://beforeitsnews.com/global-unrest/2013/05/nuclear-attack-on-syria-confirmed-2454992.html

    So much pain, so many sides to blame!

    • gary leibowitz May 13, 2013, 8:53 pm

      Nukes? Really? The news site seems a bit suspect.
      Beforeitsnews, does it have any real track record? It would be a big scoop since no one, not even the Muslim newscasters, are reporting such an event occurred.

      With the constant demise of civilization over the past 18 months watching this blog I wonder why we still doubt its conclusion. Surely if all that was reported over this time was true, or just 1/4 true, we would be in a state of chaos, trying to survive yet another day.

    • Rich May 13, 2013, 9:06 pm

      More to the point:

      Gordon Duff at Veterans Today confirmed this as a nuclear explosion.

      Check out his bona fides to see he is the real thing:

      http://www.veteranstoday.com/author/gordonduff/

    • gary leibowitz May 13, 2013, 9:25 pm

      Rich, a bunker busting bomb? Yes that seems possible and likely. I wonder when we target Iran’s facilities?

    • Troll May 14, 2013, 12:36 am

      A commercial observation satellite certainly would have picked up a 2 million pound nuker.

    • Buster May 14, 2013, 1:18 am
    • Buster May 14, 2013, 3:33 pm

      ‘We’ Gary?? I’m pretty sure ‘we’ don’t figure in the minds of the Industrial Military Complex, that by the way, plenty of our best & brightest servicemen & women are fighting behind the scenes, claiming the Nazi’s are in near complete control already.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkIIBnIuXHM

      Here’s Bill Wood giving a view from the inside. Pretty scary stuff &, by my calculations, coming to all of us sooner than most dare to realize.

    • Cam Fitzgerald May 15, 2013, 8:31 am

      Pretty sure we would have heard from the Russians by now if a nuke was dropped.

  • William May 13, 2013, 4:41 pm

    Been using Eudora for email since 1992. Works like a charm and you can migrate old email folders to a new computer and OS.

  • mava May 13, 2013, 3:49 pm

    Sounds like the server you are trying to connect to is handling some “conversations” with outlook incorrectly. This is why both the password and the test function fails.
    Trying to use the office365? If yes, those problems become even more pronounced then. Also, if you are aggregating your traffic, then the outlook with keep losing it’s session authentication if aggregator is very active.

  • Mario cavolo May 13, 2013, 3:44 pm

    Though your writing style, skill and wit as always is worthy of an award, big disagree on this one. Lots of people including my partner love the new windows 8, windows 8 phones and Surface tablets…together they create a worthy alternative environment-platform to Apple and Android moving forward in the tech world.

    The only reason I went with a new HTC smartphone after my bambino recently dunked the previous in the evening,s chicken soup is cuz it was free with the China Mobile contract we just renewed. Otherwise would love to have a Lumia 920 in my hand along with a Surface note tablet combo thing, slick stuff…

    Oh, the unpopular politically incorrect view is what I,ve just cited, so be it, it’s true nevertheless, let,s see how their hand plays out… Cheers, Mario

  • BKL May 13, 2013, 11:16 am

    It pays to be late adopter with Microsoft products. If a Microsoft product displays any kind of glitch which is difficult to remedy, the problem is trumpeted around the world virtually overnight.

    Just hang on and wait until they rush out the next version.

  • VegasBob May 13, 2013, 7:21 am

    Technology is subject to a product life cycle like anything else. At first, the improvements from version to version are dramatic. Then comes a version that is “just right.” Unfortunately, the revenue stream from the “just right” version starts to peter out, so the company has to keep changing the product in order to generate new revenue. Eventually, succeeding versions of the product tend to become worse than preceding versions.

    For example, Windows XP was pretty close to perfect for my needs. I thought its successor, Windows Vista, was an absolute abortion. Windows 7 was more to my liking – more like XP and not as bad as Vista, but still with way too much operating system overhead.

    So far, I’ve refused to even consider Windows 8. I think I’ll get an iPad before I’ll get a laptop with Windows 8.

    • VegasBob May 14, 2013, 4:37 am

      As if to punish me for daring to criticize Windows, the “New Folder” command on my laptop stopped working today. Something screwed up the registry. Fortunately, it only took me about an hour to find the right fix on the Web.

      Windows 8? NEVER!!!!!

  • Oregon May 13, 2013, 6:32 am

    Nice piece Rick. Nothing like a computer problem to focus the anger and frustration. I would bet there was very little writer’s block going on, the words probably flew onto the page.

    We use both Mac and PC in our house and although the Mac came just a couple years ago, I already prefer it, but I also understand there are some things that still aren’t Mac compatible, and there are plenty of personal Mac issues to piss me off.

    I agree with PRS that the XP platform was solid, and with a few upgrades would be far superior to the crap they have produced since.

  • PhotoRadarScam May 13, 2013, 5:31 am

    I thought I was the only one with the Outlook problem! (although I call it LookOut).

    I am tired of re-learning the basic Office and Windows interfaces every time they do an update. I guess it is lucrative if you can make the entire PC market upgrade their OS every few years, but I have to say, what was wrong with the XP interface? Who ever decided that a menu (you know, good old FILE EDIT VIEW HELP pulldowns) were no good any more?

    Can’t go to a Mac either. They’ve shunned the menus as well and have opted for unintuitive icons to do everything. A paper airplane to send an email? A sprocket for settings (what happened to the universal wrench icon for this?). I’m tired of interfaces where I have to click on everything just to see what it does.

  • Mus May 13, 2013, 5:04 am

    I can agree completely about the disaster that is Windows 8. I’ve been laptop shopping online and bar none the only complaint about the laptops being sold is that Windows 8 is installed on it. It’s never about the specs of the laptop not being up to snuff. If Windows Blue isn’t released soon we will continue to see declining sales in desktops and laptops.

  • Troll May 13, 2013, 4:57 am

    There are other programs you can use for email. Incredimail is one, and it’s easy to set up. It works a lot better than Outlook, which has always been lame.

    • Cam Fitzgerald May 13, 2013, 7:43 pm

      I use Linux. It is hopelessly difficult with its interface but it seems to not get attacked as often as Windows and you are obligated to allow (permissions) anything that tries to attach itself to your system. So far, so good but it takes more effort and is not what you might call seamless. Plus it does not often work well with video. One day they might get it up to speed but for now it suffices in my books and I have the relief in knowing nobody can really be bothered to consider it a real contender in the world of operating systems.

  • DarkKnight May 13, 2013, 3:38 am

    But Rick, you can have your cake and eat it too.
    One of the main reasons for Mac’s resurgence in recent years is their change to using Intel chips, enabling us to have Windows on the Mac too.
    So you can use Windows just for your trading /gaming software; and Mac O/S for everything else.
    It works a dream, as you can have both running simultaneously & seamlessly.

    &&&&&&

    Yes, I’ve heard that emulators are getting better all the time. But there is no escaping my dependence on Outlook, Citrix GoToWebinar, Camtasia and a few other applications that are crucial to my livelihood. RA

  • mtgoat May 13, 2013, 3:10 am

    Well, why have you kept using it? This makes no sense. Ive used Mac’s Mail for several years with only rare minor problems.

    &&&&

    In the trading world, Mac barely exists. RA