Maybe That Really *Was* the Top…

I stuck my neck out here yesterday, calling the top of a bear rally that for two years has kept the nation from facing economic reality. Here is what I wrote: “Stocks fell not because of fears over the spread of violence in the Middle East, as the pundits asserted, but because it was time for the Mother of All Bear Rallies, now almost two years old, to keel over and die.”  Of course, one can never be absolutely certain about such things, and that’s why I struggled briefly with the temptation to rephrase that sentence as follows:  “Stocks fell not because of fears over the spread of violence in the Middle East, as the pundits asserted, but perhaps because it was time for the Mother of All Bear Rallies, now almost two years old, to keel over and die.”  I’ll let my bearish call ride for now, however, because the market’s recent highs came within inches of longstanding, major Hidden Pivot targets. But I’m not going to chisel the prediction in stone as I did a “hula prediction” that Goldman Sachs would ultimately trade below $30 during the bank-stock 

collapse of 2007-08.  Goldman shares actually bottomed around $40, and that’s why I am making arrangements, finally, to deliver on a pledge to don a grass skirt and dance the hula in Times Square in the dead of winter. I will provide further details shortly for those of you who want to witness this sorry spectacle.  The irony is that Goldman probably will trade below $30 by the time the world’s $800 trillion derivatives bubble has completely deflated. I’ve also predicted – no hula dance riding on this one — that a $10 million co-op on Central Park West will eventually change hands for $250,000; and that the damage will be even worse for vacation properties.

Reason to Be Gleeful

Someone noted in the Rick’s Picks forum the other day that it is unseemly for me to act so gleeful about the prospect of a market collapse. In fact, few things that I can imagine would be healthier for the economy.  Otherwise, as long as we keep telling ourselves that things can’t really be that bad with the Dow Industrials trading above 12000, we will be unable to do what needs to be done to put the economy back on track. My hunch is that very few Americans actually view the stock market’s robust performance over the last two years as a sign of economic health or imminent recovery.  In fact, the U.S. Treasury really and truly is bankrupt, having issued $14 trillion of bogus paper that will never be redeemed in hard cash. The banks are broke too, since the bogus paper they’ve been warehousing at the Fed remains a liability of the banking system as a whole, not of some virtual dumping ground called ”the Fed.”  We are indeed broke, and anyone who tries to argue otherwise deserves to be scorned. As for the blip in corporate profits that the Wall Street Journal et al. have enthused over, it came at the expense of the labor force, and the sums involved cannot begin to compensate for the fleeting “wealth” we thought we possessed just a few years ago.  Nearly all of it came from a financial sector that was able to gin up nearly a quadrillion dollars of leveraged financial instruments. In comparison, as an engine of job and “wealth” creation, our $2.5 trillion manufacturing economy is insignificant.

(If you’d like to have Rick’s Picks commentary delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)

  • Mercurious February 26, 2011, 7:39 pm

    Just to follow on with a further thought regarding Mario’s point above: I have believed for quite some time the smartest move for the average person to make in positioning oneself economically today is to figure out employment that caters to the high earners, who are clearly doing well. Yes…I’m aware that’s no novel insight. But the why is.

    Besides the immediate benefit of higher real–and secure–income, there is a second angle even more critical if some of Rick’s darker scenarios play out…I happen to think he’s correct about those. It will go much better for you to be seen as working class and catering to the wealthy than to be wealthy yourself. Populist policies can morph into mob mentality easily, and being branded as rich in those circumstances could be a death sentence, either metaphorically or in reality.

    Much better to be a well paid window washer for the king now than to be a courtesan in those days.

  • Mike February 25, 2011, 4:15 am

    An engineer can tell us at what point a specific material will break when holding x amount of load, a doctor can tell someone (approximately) how long they have to live when inflicted with a deadly disease. The way I see it, this can go on almost forever. I have friends (many of them) whose lifestyle hasn’t change a bit. they are oblivious to the problems that the other 80 percent are having. they’re planning expensive vacations, they’re paying for expensive schools for their kids, they’re golfing all the time on “business” trips, their wives don’t work and just go shopping, on and on.
    It is completely confounding to me. I don’t get it.

    • mario cavolo February 25, 2011, 6:36 am

      Hi Mike, you’re touching on a point I consistently put forth, that the economic picture needs to be divided in two; the upper middle income and rich sector are doing great, better than ever. And in fact there is plenty of business and plenty of commerce and plenty of action taking place across the globe. Its a statistical fact. BUT the other group, the lower and middle income sector of the main societies have had the foundation of their lives altered creating continuous decline that looks about to get worse.

      So, for example, if we have:

      A. 10 families with $500,000 (an arbitrary number for example purposes) and productive and profitable in society plus;
      B. 17 families struggling to make a living, going broke, 30% of them needing food stamps and other social gov’t support.

      Then on balance, that’s not a disater or doom ‘n gloom scenario at all for Group A. If society does take a down turn, then Group A will indeed be burdened with Group B’s financial stress, but they have the wherewithall to give it to them.

      I keep repeating that the rich are richer than ever and doing great and this includes many people in the upper middle income sector too.

      Today at 3pm I went to the Sprouts supermarket center, a typical large shopping area; the parking lot was packed. Yes, Group A above is doing just fine.

      Cheers, Mario

  • gary leibowitz February 24, 2011, 11:53 pm

    If this is the start of a new bear trend, and it is steep and long, I wouldn’t count on Gold to move opposite the stock market. First off you will have the “safety” issue. Money flowing out of equities is likely to benefit the dollar, especially if there continues to be global tensions.

    You also have Uncle Ben’s money machine these past 2 years creating unintended bubbles. One such bubble is chasing commodities. If equities falls hard soon than deflation will come back with a vengeance. That is another reason I suspect Gold will not be able to rise from these levels.

    In fact it looks like the dollar could rise sharply, equities fall just as hard, as treasury yields falls back to post crash levels, and the dollar gains strength.

    A complete opposite of what most expect, but given a premise that deflation will win out it makes sense.

    I suspect the market should show its hand before mid-year. I will bet most will be caught off guard on the trend changes and stubbornly insist it is another great buying opportunity. The last 2 years of steady clear trends will create some violent moves as reality sets in that the trend is permanently broken.

    Interesting times ahead of us.

  • Carol February 24, 2011, 9:11 pm

    Well, on the one hand, it is good to know that there is at least on honest man left. On the other, I promise not to look at you in the hula skirt. I will also pray for a nice sunny day with balmy temperatures.

  • John Jay February 24, 2011, 7:11 pm

    Well, Rick, if you have decided to go through with the “Hula”, I think you should at least make a motion for a change of venue to……… Venice Beach in California.
    Nice weather, and no one will pay any attention to you there, no police problems for the eccentric.

  • Mike February 24, 2011, 7:10 pm

    Rick

    I’ll give you a nice call (sort of) even at 47 from where it came from. But you were still calling for 30 by 12/10 as late as july or august or later I believe. did you really still think it was going to 30 by december in august/sept 2010?
    as far eventually hitting 30….anyone can say, even me someday the earth will end and eventually I’ll be right. with all that we/YOU now know,
    can you please give us some sort of time frame?

    • Rick Ackerman February 24, 2011, 7:50 pm

      Sorry, but I can’t give you a time frame for an event that will mark the complete destruction of the global financial system. But it stands to reason that if and when this occurs, Goldman Sachs’ empire will be reduced to smoldering ashes. I’m sure you’ll agree that there is plenty of bank-sector hubris remaining to be deflated away.

      My friend Fred Hapgood, who has written cover stories for well-respected magazines, was always skeptical of my predictions of deflation, and he never hesitated to haul out the broken-clock analogy. But there were no broken clocks predicting deflation in the mid-1990s, when I first wrote on the topic in Barron’s and the SF Examiner; and there are relatively few broken clocks predicting now, in effect, that the Great Recession has barely begun. I’d say we broken clocks are overdue for some respect.

    • Rich February 26, 2011, 3:18 am

      You Rick, Karl Denninger, Irving Fisher, Vern Myers, Nicholas Kondratyev, Jesse Livermore, Bob Prechter, David Rosenberg, Nouriel Roubini, Stan Salvigsen, Gary Shilling, all saw the dark black light big picture clearly if perhaps early, while taking a lot of heat and static for it.
      Stan even did a triple net lease/sale on his home and bought it back at a lower price in the 80s before dying of a heart attack at 53 in 1996 fighting the tape at Comstock Partners, since redeemed for its bearish view…
      http://www.zerohedge.com/article/karl-denninger-sees-dow-3000-next-year

  • Robert February 24, 2011, 6:32 pm

    Ok, no one has bitten back at Mario, so it’s up to me:

    “So ok then, we’ll devalue the dollar and a few years later when the U.S. assets are more and more attractively cheap, the money and investment and growth will start to flow back in. That is not unreasonable, just that there’s so much damned damage along the way. ”

    – Seriously?

    And, how exactly does a weakening currency result in more attractive domestic prices? Or, are you suggesting that as the currency weakens that it will mean stronger US exports, and therefore greater domestic growth? if so, then how, exactly, will these miraculous exports be manufactured?

    The cynic in me says that the US will have to hit a very deep and rocky bottom before manufacturing and the ability to export the surplus ever returns to these shores. Our manufacturing infrastructure is decomposing, our labor rate to productivity ratios are the most God-awful on the entire planet (they are now even worse than the UK’s, and that is REALLY saying something), and, as Wisconsin demonstrates, the people in this country still seem to feel that they are ENTITLED to a 6 figure gross income in exchange for doing manual labor that requires no more than 200 hours of vocational school training to qualify for…

    We are a long way from Mario’s utopian renaissance. However, I do agree that at some point, the “genius” target of Mario’s man-crush will succeed in devaluing the dollar past a heretofore unknown/unseen inflection point where foreign dollar holders, no longer able to trade dollars for oil or local currencies, will instead re-patriate these dollars back onto US shores. The result will not be real growth in the US economy or increasing real incomes for American citizens. The result will be unreal nominal growth in American prices.

    I firmly contend that the global repudiation of the dollar which is just now getting underway, will end up yielding a domestic repudiation of the dollar within the next 5-10 years.

    There are simply too many dollars in global supply for this not to come to pass.

    And I know you are all thinking “but, what about the Fed soaking the excess supply back up by raising interest rates”

    – Really? Look what a measly 125 basis point increase in the prime lending rate did to our housing market in 2007… What do you think a REAL increase of 500-800 basis points will do to our economy? Now consider what a Paul Vockerian 1000-2000 basis point increase would do.

    I don’t think I even have to mention what a 5% increase would do the ability of the Government to service our EXISTING debt, not to mention all the new debt that emerges from year over year budget deficits.

    Here’s a hint- it wouldn’t stimulate our manufacturing and exporting machine, that’s for damn sure.

    Simply put- the dollar is finished as a valid measure of qualified economic capital. FINISHED.

    The game is over, even thought there still seem to be a lot of players on the field thinking that if they pick up the ball and run for the goal that they will make a difference on the scoreboard.

    Basic, untenable economic facts:

    1) The dollar is a measurement of DEBT, therefore the supply of dollars indicates the supply of unpaid debt.
    2) All debts must either be paid in full, or defaulted on.

    The US money masters can only have one real goal in mind- and that is to keep the dollar on life support long enough for the Chinese real estate market to implode, and for Chinese price inflation to hammer the underprivileged hard enough for the “Egyptian effect” to hit Shanghai.

    I am convinced that there is a metric- I don’t know if it is a pre-conceived dollar level on the DXY, or if it is some level of backwardation in the Gold market, but I do know that when that metric (whatever it is) is reached, there will be a statement by Bernanke (that is probably already prepared) to Congress where he makes the soft “observation” that Gold “seems” to be acting more like a global currency than simply as an input commodity to the jewelry industry…. and that will be quite a day.

    • Rich February 24, 2011, 7:33 pm

      Bravo Robert.
      So why is the USD PnF targeting 115?
      Could it be debt default with asset deflation is bullish for the dollar?…

    • Robert February 25, 2011, 1:39 am

      Hi Rich-

      I’ve never relied on the charts to predict game-changing shifts in sentiment.

      I’ll also note the if the dollar index prints a 76 on the daily P&F, then the trend reverses, while it needs to print an 81 to strengthen the trend, and right now it is closer to 76 than it is to 81…. 🙂

    • Rich February 26, 2011, 2:58 am

      Yes, the PnF charts do swing with sentiment, and they are near a breakdown.
      Yet Big4 are long the buck here after being short since 88.71 in June 2010.
      Talk about contrarians…

  • DG February 24, 2011, 6:26 pm

    Funny that Austin Powers stunt double, James Altucher, was on CNBC this morning stating that QE2 will kick into the market in 6 months and prices will all go higher, including S&P. 1500 is in the bag.
    I don’t know what he was doing when the ‘Nank was introducing QE2, but I am pretty sure I witnessed prices respond to QE2 within minutes of its publication. Altucher once dismissed inflationary pressures, now he embraces and accepts it and states that The S&P is the greatest inflationary hedge – “even better than gold” he stated. I guess his stockcharts account is the free one that won’t calculate the $spx:$gold since 2000 showing the ratio drop……5.5 to 0.92 as of 10 seconds ago. Better hedge??? I guess my calculator is broken.
    Not that looks matter…..but…..
    Who says you can’t judge a book by its cover? goofy and false logic.
    run.

    • Rich February 24, 2011, 7:29 pm

      COMP:GOLD=>
      Nothing like a real -89% decline to see things straight.
      Talking heads on hypnotic media lead the lemmings to slaughter…

  • Rich February 24, 2011, 6:16 pm

    Yesterday and next week Alex Jones Lindsay Williams Infowars.com Double Cross scenario.
    LW suggested Arab Oil for US Treasuries deal going back to Kissinger/Rockefeller in 70s may be taken off the table so dollar dives, treasuries default and domestic drilling proven reserves unleashed…

    • Rich February 24, 2011, 9:13 pm

      And in related paranoid politics, Bob Chapman International Forecaster reported:

      “Sources at the United States Embassy in Beijing China have just CONFIRMED to me that the United States of America has tendered to China a written agreement which grants to the People’s Republic of China, an option to exercise Eminent Domain within the USA, as collateral for China’s continued purchase of US Treasury Notes and existing US Currency reserves!
      The written agreement was brought to Beijing by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and was formalized and agreed-to during her recent trip to China.
      This means that in the event the US Government defaults on its financial obligations to China, the Communist Government of China would be permitted to physically take inside the USA land, buildings, factories, perhaps even entire cities to satisfy the financial obligations of the US government.
      Put simply, the feds have now actually mortgaged the physical land and property of all citizens and businesses in the United States. They have given to a foreign power, their Constitutional power to “take” all of our property, as actual collateral for continued Chinese funding of US deficit spending and the continued carrying of US national debt….

    • mario cavolo February 25, 2011, 3:35 am

      I’ll dig into this from my Shanghai perch….Mario

    • Rich February 26, 2011, 2:55 am

      Will be very interested to know what you find out Mario,,

  • PhotoRadarScam February 24, 2011, 5:35 pm

    With Bernanke juicing the market, and the juicing not scheduled to end for a few more months, it’s a tough call that this is the top. Billions are being pumped in… hard to have a market fall with that much cash entering the system. That’s all I’m saying.

    &&&&&

    I’d agree with you if I thought about it, PRS, but that’s precisely why I’ve adopted an unthinking, coldly mechanical forecasting system. RA

  • Benjamin February 24, 2011, 4:36 pm

    From a certain perspective, a bear “rally” is indeed giving way. Like productive employment for example. Just hasn’t been hitting any previous peaks, but does continue to hit new lows (see Shadowstats). And what with Illinois becoming a safe haven for brave pirates who don’t want to face the music (now IN hypocrats are running), that won’t be getting any better any time soon.

    I also heard a story from the local news this AM. Apparently, people are starting to put more into their 401ks now. Of course, while this dollar amount might indeed be up, the number of people doing it are probably not. If they were, the media would only be too happy to report it, as that would lend more credibility to their reports of a bogus recovery. Speaking of which…

    I remember the article here at Rick’s where the topic was that of govt employees being thrown into 401k plans instead of pensions. This would be done, iirc, because munis are in deep, deep trouble. I see again what high interest in munis would do. Think about it… Govt union employees in WI can still “negotiate” (take) wages. This will probably spread to all other states. When munis default en masse, those employees will basically have to go into some other retirement plan. Likely, they will invest as much money as they want into 401ks, IRAs, and the like. Can this boost stocks?

    I’m guessing such a shift probably could create such a massive rush. Suppose that govt unions increase wages every quarter (CoL raises, which would be increasingly on the rise, given the nature of things), starting with 1,000. Furthermore, what if this amount were to double every quarter for, say, two years?

    This would be 256,000 per employee. There are about 22.5 million govt union employees (which is, imo, a conservative estimate)…

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2466363/posts

    That adds up to nearly 6 trillion. It isn’t a lot, of course, but it could at least slow any decent into darkness (at the expense of anyone not in the business of putting people OUT of business).

    And it would be interesting (read: predictable) to see how these newly “rich” people will feel about paying more in taxes to support the unemployed they would create. They wouldn’t lend a helping hand, but I’m sure they would spare a finger for everyone who needs it.

    Anyway, Mr. Cavolo… I like the thumb idea. It’s a great _beginning_! And while I can’t say here in decent company what I do if I were king of Never Never Land, rest assured that it would be unforgettable, hilarious, and quite devious!

  • redwilldanaher February 24, 2011, 4:36 pm

    Hi Mario, I’m too busy to take the bait this go round. Will have to let Steve et al. respond to the accolades re: the ‘Nank.

    As for Rick’s “glee”, I’ll never apologize for cheering against evil psychopaths and their schemes. I don’t think that he should either.

  • mario cavolo February 24, 2011, 9:38 am

    Hi All,

    I’ll remain respectfully provocative; no doom, no crash. Be reasonable. Every single time the market does anything but go up, the world seems to forget that even a 10-15% correction would be a reasonable expectation. What, the stock market is currently outrageously overvalued? It is NOT.

    Rick clearly knows we are broke and offers brilliant, insightful analysis. But why does it have to be so complicated or disastrous? Yes we are indeed broke, oh so broke, incredibly broke with a system that is rotten to the core and yet to experience the next set of rollercoaster shenanigans triggered by some next financial or societal apocalyptic black swan….yes, yes, yes and yes.

    Fine. So? It will all be reflected in two simple trends:

    1. The continuing falling value of currencies, starting with the USD. Nothing new there.
    2. Inflation- rising prices of stuff. Nothing new there.
    3. Lower and middle class lifestyles and opportunities in further decline. Nothing new there.
    4. Rich folks lifestyles better than ever. Nothing new there.

    Lots of people getting screwed along the way? Yep, that’s not new.
    Values in the country, integrity of the system gone to hell? Yep, that’s not new either and calls to string the genuinely responsible, greedy bureaucrats up by their thumbs are warranted.

    What can any one of us do about it except adjust our own lives accordingly? Which is, as great folks like Benjamin, Steve and RWD remind us might mean doing what we can to “exit” the matrix.

    Myself and hundreds of thousands of expat living overseas have certainly done that to some degree already residing for many years at locals overseas. But there are plenty of plusses and minuses to bear with that choice too.

    Meanwhile, one might dare to say Bernanke is brilliant, doing the only thing he knows he can do in response to the Chinese who stubbornly refuse to let their RMB float and appreciate to where it “should” be in the global currency playing field. So ok then, we’ll devalue the dollar and a few years later when the U.S. assets are more and more attractively cheap, the money and investment and growth will start to flow back in. That is not unreasonable, just that there’s so much damned damage along the way.

    Cheers all, Mario

    • mario cavolo February 24, 2011, 4:48 pm

      I was live on the charts for that oil short squeeze blast to 103 last night…it happened in less than a minute, that sounds like speculative traders covering shorts and HFT computers, not to do with “supply and demand” and the media is reporting it…

      I’ll go with Rich on this one who noted the other day that market declines have been preceded by oil spikes; not hard to say that the world’s fragile economy can not afford pricey oil…meanwhile, the Dow held 12k support on the selloff…we’ll see…

      Cheers, Mario

    • Rich February 24, 2011, 5:59 pm

      Hi Mario und alles
      With Nomura talking $220 oil, Libya dominoes in the headline memes again with Brent at 119 this wee early AM.
      Big4 long oil suggests this may be the real deal.
      Solar flare electromagnetics bringing mass market volatility and weather.
      Keeping an eye on AUD/JPY, a good indicator for awhile…

    • Carol February 24, 2011, 9:25 pm

      China you say? Ah. The Chinese are too smart to let their currency appreciate until all U.S. and western stocks are at bargain basement prices, at which point they just might buy the corporations in the native currencies, thus getting rid of their inventory of said currencies, then go in for the kill by finally letting theirs appreciate. Two bits says their empire lasts longer than ours will have. I hope they have some kindly Miss Manners to show them how to less ruthlessly rule the world than appears to be their wont. Fingers crossed.

    • Benjamin February 24, 2011, 9:54 pm

      I wanted to chime in on the points Mario made, but didn’t quite have the time this morning. Second, what it all implies makes me MAD AS HELL and GRRRR! Maybe I’m just off in my own little understanding of things, but…

      I think Mario is right because the trend is toward more authoritarianism. Government will buy up/out everything in order to save things like teachers unions (and other important useless stuff), which means having to save the market from itself. After all, can’t very well have the lazy, good-for-nothing private sector that is failing to employ people cause those unemployed to live off the government employees that hardly pay any taxes. Why, that would be so un-American, wouldn’t it, and isn’t that what all the Fox-washed numbskulls want government to stop doing?

      Right, so governments buy up all, and put people to work. And where will they get the money for all this? Aside from emptying out whatever remains of the $FRN, they’ll probably go back to issuing their own currencies in a not-so-“gold-standard”, gold standard. How do I know? I don’t but something recently popped into mind, concerning the gold/silver ratio.

      A while back, I said would not trade any gold for silver this time around. The ratio has since lowered, and silver is busting out to a new peak while gold lags a bit behind. Long story short, I suspect with every swing more paper “metal” is going into the market. Backwardation is being driven to occur. And once there, then governments will have the ability to “go back to hard money” without having to nor having to run it properly. As I suggested here…

      http://www.rickackerman.com/2011/02/bullion-he-prefers-mining-shares/#comment-17764

      What I see shaping up to take place is far less preferable than a meteor to the Earth causing a prolonged nuclear winter. At least then, we’d be free. Not so in the “safety and security” of the ruthless state. And then, the damages will only have just begun.

  • TKO February 24, 2011, 8:39 am

    Oft we pondered your prior rash and not precise (perhaps premature) predictions pertaining to GS price. Proposed punishment performance will not expiate previous promise as “dead of winter” has passed. Project not permitted.

    Respectfully

    The Proper Procedure Platoon

    • Rick Ackerman February 24, 2011, 5:33 pm

      The show will go on, TKO, although I’ve been warned not to attempt it in Times Square because of public safety concerns. Mid-March weather will be iffy at best, but there is that chance the hula will be performed in a foot of snow.

      As for my under-$30 Goldman prediction, it was hardly “premature.” In fact, it went out in the spring of 2008, just ahead of the final collapse of the bank stocks. It would seem you were not on the mailing list for this alert (and thus the sour-grapes flavor of your edict), but the alert gave catastrophic targets, all of which were reached or exceeded, for a dozen other bank stocks. Fannie and Freddie were marked for “Oblivion”; Bear Stearns sported a negative Hidden Pivot target the meaning of which I did not comprehend at the time; and targets for Lehman and Merrill Lynch implied a haircut of about 90 percent. Goldman shares had come down from $250, so I never felt much embarrassment about having overshot the $47 low. I was unaware at the time that Goldman owned the U.S. Treasury and therefore was unlikely to suffer the worst that I could have predicted.

    • Dave February 25, 2011, 1:35 am

      Rick,

      You have nothing to worry about. Times Square has street cleaners that clear the snow fast. The Naked Cowboy already is a Times Square fixture. Maybe a mini-hula or hula bikini will gather you more attention. Like Broadway shows, you can do a matinee in front of the Good Morning America studio (the tourists begin lining up at 6am) and a late afternoon show in front of the NASD where CNBC broadcasts Fast Money.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naked_Cowboy

  • Rich February 24, 2011, 6:01 am

    Although Point and Figure targets for Bonds, Gold, Oil, Silver and SPX are all still targeting higher due to endless expectations of QE III…, PnF trends have flipped at turning points.

    Thus well-deserved respect for Rick’s Hidden Pivot Points, with sincere admiration for his bold calls.

    Meanwhile, Martin Armstrong’s latest essay may shed some light on market fundamental how’s:

    http://www.martinarmstrong.org/files/Sovereign%20Debt%20Crisis%20Dancing%20With%20Death%20%202-9-2011.pdf

    • Rich February 24, 2011, 5:53 pm

      Despite $1620 PnF gold target, got a nibble on GLL>27.66 yesterday, still actionable, accumulating more if Gold PnF flips down…

  • jon February 24, 2011, 5:52 am

    Focus on the breath, everything else is an illusion.

    &&&&&

    It needs to be mighty cold to see one’s breath, Jon. Anyway, here at Rick’s Picks we’ve been doing just fine focusing solely on price. RA

    • paul February 24, 2011, 2:13 pm

      dear paul after reading your comment i i thought u may like to ck out my teachers web site wopg.org it is about connecting to that which is real within i wish u the best

  • John Jay February 24, 2011, 5:02 am

    I am making a motion for dismissal with prejudice for Rick on his “Hula” sentence in the matter of his missed call for a bottom for GS.
    Next, for my own call on the Dow, the monthly chart is still trending up, the Hi/Lo monthly moving average is up, my daily chart shows up, Hi/Lo daily moving average is up, it bounced off the Lo moving average at about 12045, 50 and 200 daily MA’s up with a 722 point separation. I will say it needs to close below 11841 and stay there on the daily chart to break the uptrend, and about 10841 on the monthly to break that uptrend.
    If it breaks big to the downside there should be the usual backing and filling, if it goes straight down 3,000 points that will be sight to see for sure.

  • Gabez February 24, 2011, 4:53 am

    Hula dance! I want the hula dance! Maybe some sensual movements and a swirling waist will finally bring GS to its knees. That’s probably the last thing left to try.