Falling T-Bond Threatens Illusion of Fed Control

Helicopter Ben said so many dumbfounding things the other night on 60 Minutes that we wouldn’t know where to begin if we were to go after him.  His ostensible interviewer, Scott Pelley, was clearly out of his depth, so it looks like we’ll have to wait until Bernanke faces Rep. Ron Paul on Capitol Hill before we get a clearer picture of the issues the Fed chairman would have us believe he is managing. During the CBS segment that aired Sunday night, the Fed chief denied printing money, but Pelley failed to press him on this whopping technicality.  Bernanke also said he could throttle inflation in an instant if it becomes necessary.  That absurdity, too, sailed right over Pelley’s head – either that, or he simply didn’t care about the economy-killing implications of the banker’s implied “solution” – i.e., higher interest rates.

Quantitative easing's reality check

On that score we have some potentially very bad news — not only for the Fed chairman, but for all debtors. Take a look at the chart above and you’ll see why.  The price of the 30-Year Treasury Bond future has been falling hard for two months, with a corresponding increase in yields.  The interest rate on the long Bond was 3.73% when the slide began; now it’s around 4.43% — a rise of nearly 20%.  Rick’s Picks expects the March T-Bond to keep falling, presumably to a “Hidden Pivot” support at 120 10/32. At that point, yields will have risen to about 4.60%. Things could get really ugly, however, if the support fails, since that has the potential to send the futures plummeting all the way to 117 22/32.  At that price, the long-term interest rate would be around 4.82%.  Spread this asphyxiating rate over public borrowing, adjustable mortgages and revolving credit, and the extra tab would run into the hundreds of billions of dollars for taxpayers, homeowners and consumers.

When Expectations Change

But that’s where Bernanke’s problems would just be starting, since he is, after all, in the business of managing expectations. With long-term rates creeping toward 5%, that number would become magnetic as lenders start to see it as all but a foregone conclusion. The dollar would initially turn strong as interest rates broke their administrative shackles to ascend toward market levels.  This trend might conceivably continue for some months – perhaps for as long as a year – until it became apparent that higher borrowing costs were pushing the U.S. Treasury toward the breaking point. No one can predict what will happen if perceptions mutate into panic.  More immediately, however, the markets could develop a mind of their own, laying siege to the Fed’s doomed effort to hold real interest rates down through trickery, lies and deception.

(If you’d like to have Rick’s Picks commentary delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)

  • dave December 12, 2010, 9:50 pm

    does anybody know of any good articles that explain why bernake can’t “throttle” inflation at the drop of a dime as says he can?

  • Mark Uzick December 9, 2010, 12:59 pm

    Bernanke claims that the money that the fed creates in order to loan to the federal government doesn’t increase the money supply because it’s parked in treasuries instead of circulating. That means that the money that the federal government borrows from the fed is not spent and does not circulate.

    What a laugh. He must think we’re all morons!

    And what’s this crap about there being no price inflation? The feds claim it’s hovering between1-3%. The hard money people claim that it’s more like 10%. My subjective experience at the store and when paying bills tells me it’s more like 20%.

  • ricecake December 9, 2010, 6:04 am

    Mr. Rick,

    May I add the followings:

    1) Tension of Massive war break out in Asia (Korean War II for example.) Then Safe Heaven Autopilot once again kick in. Money is flying into the US Treasury.

    2) China collapsed suddenly and is conqured by the USA.

    Don’t forget, Pentagon and Wall Street are working together. The US economic hit men will be on the action before you know it, to destabilize regions that’s vulnerable. They already have their master plan made long time ago. Don’t underestimate the might and power of the US war mongers to defend the $.

    Wait and see.

  • David Tanner December 8, 2010, 9:32 pm

    Rising Rates Could Prove Fatal To Fake Recovery

    Okay, anybody that has been walking around with their eyes open knows that we are not in a recovery. Of course, saying that we are is the Fed’s only way of keeping a lid on this explosive cocktail of lower interest rates and easy money. And what might be lurking out there to provide the spark that lights the fuse that blows all this fatal brew into the stratosphere?

    Higher interest rates.

    This is an excerpt from Rick Ackerman’s daily commentary:

    On that score we have some potentially very bad news — not only for the Fed chairman, but for all debtors. Take a look at the chart above and you’ll see why. The price of the 30-Year Treasury Bond future has been falling hard for two months, with a corresponding increase in yields. The interest rate on the long Bond was 3.73% when the slide began; now it’s around 4.43% — a rise of nearly 20%. Rick’s Picks expects the March T-Bond to keep falling, presumably to a “Hidden Pivot” support at 120 10/32. At that point, yields will have risen to about 4.60%. Things could get really ugly, however, if the support fails, since that has the potential to send the futures plummeting all the way to 117 22/32. At that price, the long-term interest rate would be around 4.82%. Spread this asphyxiating rate over public borrowing, adjustable mortgages and revolving credit, and the extra tab would run into the hundreds of billions of dollars for taxpayers, homeowners and consumers.

    The public, the government and corporate America are all in debt up to their eyeballs, and higher interest rates only makes servicing that debt harder. Higher interest rates now would draw more money out of the economy and place it in the pockets of the banksters, the ultimate culprits of our current economic collapse. The final result would be more defaults, job losses and business failures.

    Of course, that IS the ultimate plan of the power-elite: to drive this country into the ground so that we will cry out for them to “save us.” And save us they will, as the last vestiges of our freedom are willingly surrendered by dumbed-down Americans who would rather let the establishment do their thinking for them and blindly swallow everything the media reports as truth.

    History always repeats itself and for those of you who missed last week’s post on Joseph, I’d urge you to give it a read so you can see where we are headed and how to protect yourself.

    “And when money failed in the land of Egypt . . . all the Egyptians came unto Joseph, and said, Give us bread: for why should we die in thy presence? for the money faileth.” Gen. 47:15

  • Steve W December 8, 2010, 5:45 pm

    I am assuming that since interest rates are rising, people will be pulling their money out of all sorts of investments in order to get the guaranteed interest payment. Thus the drop in gold, silver, stocks. However, as I recall, in the late 70’s under the Carter Administration, interest rates, gold and silver were at all time highs. Will the past repeat itself?

    • Robert December 8, 2010, 7:02 pm

      It may not repeat, but it will certainly follow a similar theme…

      That is, unless the Universe re-writes the basic psychological foundation of economics.

  • warren December 8, 2010, 4:52 pm

    T-Bond; that’s just another piece of paper, right?

  • Other Paul December 8, 2010, 4:41 pm

    Many savers (including pension trustees) would love to get their hands on 5 to 6 percent Treasuries. For a couple of years many have had their funds tied up in shorter term CDs and T-Bills and money market funds which yield practically nothing. Some have precious metals with negative yields (after storage fees). Other have appreciation on stocks with little or no dividend, but have capital gains.

    • Robert December 8, 2010, 6:58 pm

      I agree with the validity of your statement

      Please see my post above as to why I think these “savers” are getting set up exactly the same way that local currency denominated savers got set up in 1922 Germany, and in early 1970’s USA, and in early 1980’s Brazil, and in Early 2000’s Argentina… etc.

  • roger erickson December 8, 2010, 3:51 pm

    This setting only gets worse. Warren Mosler has an accurately scathing commentary on the state of bond-policy commentary by academics. Mkt damage can be done by highly publicized misinformation, regardless of the degree of error. Propaganda works.

    from http://moslereconomics.com/2010/12/08/bond-vigilantes-could-target-us-roubini/

    “Bond Vigilantes Could Target US: Roubini

    Posted by WARREN MOSLER on December 8th, 2010

    As a kid growing up I would have thought big time university professors would know better than this.

    It should be obvious to him that markets follow expectations of future Fed policy, they don’t cause it.

    The fed funds rate changes only when the Fed votes to change it, and the NY Fed has a good enough understanding of its own monetary operations to implement the FOMC’s will. The fact that under Geithner they never could hit a fed funds target is another story for another time, but rest assured it had nothing to do with bond vigilantes.

    Yields are probably going up for two reasons. The first is the expectation that fiscal expansion does work and therefore the Fed is more likely to hike that much sooner. Note that GDP forecasts being raised by most all economists, who also were ready to lower forecasts if the tax cuts are allowed to expire.

    The currency is a public monopoly, and as a simple point of logic (not theory or ideology) a monopolist sets two prices. One is how the item exchanges for itself, what Marshall called the ‘own rate’ and for the currency is the interest rate.

    In other words, the Fed/govt. sets the entire term structure of risk free rates, one way or another, whether it likes it or not and/or knows it or not.

    A monopolist also sets the terms of exchange for his item vs all other things, which for the currency is called the ‘price level’.

    In other words, the price level is necessarily a function of prices paid by gov when it spends, also whether it knows/likes it or not.

    (Kindly send this along to the good professor if you have his contact info.)”

  • FranSix December 8, 2010, 3:19 pm

    Price fixing is in evidence here in the bullion prior to options expiry. The see-sawing is tremendous, not dissimilar to Dec. 2005.

    In other news, the 5-year TIPS yields look like they may actually turn positive.

    But I would not be forecasting higher long term rates any time soon. Its always a given that when hot games are on, and the commercial banking sector first sells treasuries they do not own and then gambles it on commodities, they come running back to the sovereign bond markets when these bets on hyperinflation are wrong. As Rick mentioned, they’re hardier than cockroaches.

    If gold should decline when copper and oil are in the headlines, then this is the same dynamic.

    • Robert December 8, 2010, 6:53 pm

      Yeah, recently rising copper and oil prices are discounting what, exactly? Global economic prosperity? Really?

      The world is still drowning in excess industrial production output, and yet the Central planners (be they in government or the Central Banks) are trying to stimulate rising prices….

      Hmmm, rising prices on things that are in steadily increasing supply over time… I’m pretty sure that perpetual motion machine has not been invented yet.

      Meanwhile, the things that are in decreasing market supply (whether due to hoarding, or due to reduced mine production- hint hint) are going DOWN in price…? Say what?

      The big money moves with the herd, but the smart money moves with the trends.

  • roger erickson December 8, 2010, 3:11 pm

    detailed explanation courtesy of Stephanie Kelton, UMKC
    k.faculty.umkc.edu

    “When the treasury auctions new bonds, it specifies what percentage of the total offering is eligible for purchase by Special Depositories (this is usually but not always 100%). This means that banks that are designated “special depositories” may purchase Treasury bonds without using any existing balances (i.e. without drawing on existing reserves). This means that private banks are acting as ‘fiscal agents’ for the US Treasury, buying bonds simply by crediting the Treasury’s account (Abba Lerner called this ‘printing money’ on behalf of the government).

    Here’s how it works, using balance sheet entries.

    ……. Bank ……………………………….. Treasury
    ———————— ……………………. ———————-
    +Bonds | + TT&L ……………… + TT&L | + Bonds

    (Assets) .. (Liabilities) …………….. (Assets) .. (Liabilities)

    The TT&L accounts are “Treasury Tax & Loan” accounts. Private banks mark up the size of the Treasury’s account to ‘pay for’ the purchase of the Treasury bonds. It costs the bank NOTHING to do this. And note that the TT&L is not part of the money supply. Nothing of consequence has happened up to this point.

    Now let’s suppose the government expects to write $100 million in checks on its account at the Fed (the only way the Treasury spends), but it only expects to receive $80 million in tax payments into this account (simplifying, because most tax payments go, initially, into TT&L accounts). If it does nothing, the banking system will gain $20 million in reserves ($100 million in spending adds $100 million in reserves, and $80 million in tax payments drains $80 million in reserves — so the net reserve effect is + $20 million). Under normal circumstances, net injections of reserves will push the overnight interest rate (fed funds) to zero, which isn’t desirable, since the Fed is usually targeting a positive rate. To prevent the overnight rate from falling, the Treasury places a “call” on its TT&L accounts. The goal is to transfer just enough to offset the reserve ‘add’ that would otherwise result from the deficit spending (in this case, $20 million). When the Treasury directs commercial banks to transfer funds from its TT&L accounts to its account at the Fed, commercial banks lose reserves, but they gain them back in (roughly) the same proportion, so there is little disruption in the funds rate.

    Currency supply changes because the Fed buys things too! Anytime the Federal Reserve makes a purchase, it pays by crediting bank accounts (i.e. issuing new money). So net financial assets come from deficit spending by the Treas. AND from Fed purchases.”

    • Robert December 8, 2010, 6:41 pm

      The cliff’s notes to Ms. Kelton’s analysis:

      The Fed and the Treasury are playing the world’s biggest game of chicken.

      If the Treasury Market tanks, the US government will have absolutely NO WAY to pay it’s bills- the default will be right there on the front page of every paper on Earth (unless Giethner decides to pull a JFK and start issuing Treasury notes directly)

      And, if the Fed continues buying US Paper to guarantee demand for the Treasury’s junk, then we all know what happens to the implied value of the currency.

      So, this is really a question of who blinks first: the Federal Reserve, or the Federal Goverment?

  • roger erickson December 8, 2010, 3:09 pm

    but in this case, wasn’t Bernanke’s intention to alter long term rates & either force banks into other investments? (or further protect their threatened balance sheets?)
    (the FED doesn’t always say what it’s really intending)
    (none of which worked out as intended, for long – for banks OR Main St.)

    ironically, the FEDs actions [even free from interpretation] may be the best tool for FORCING AWARENESS of another alternative – ending T-bonds altogether
    (which are part of a very confusing, & unnecessary, bookkeeping method used by the Treasury to create currency & drain reserves)

    some of the strange details of T-bond transactions are described here: http://www.netrootsmass.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/images/20100428-2-Stephanie-Kelton.pdf

    it doesn’t seem that even Bernanke is fully aware of real FED/Treasury operational details; it all seems over politicized, and hence open to both innocent fraud & Control Fraud
    http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/04032009/profile.html

  • Tim December 8, 2010, 2:18 pm

    Can Rick or someone else in the know explain why gold gets clobbered on such a day, apart from the obvious knee jerk reaction and some help from the big bad boys?

    The fall in bonds is rightly being put down to another HUGE increase in the deficit thanks to no spending cuts and big tax giveaways. I have heard talk of 600bn being added to the deficit just due to the announcements yesterday.

    This effectively guarantees that the FED will be forced to monitise the entire shortfall, either through stealth or a more public QE extension, which has already been hinted at.

    Somebody please tell me how this leads to a sell off in gold and silver in anything other than the knee jerk form???

    • Robert December 8, 2010, 6:30 pm

      Ok, here’s my take on the Gold and Silver correction:

      When bond rates are rising, there will always be some sheep that move to convert standing equity into regular income, and the Baby Boomers are the most super-sheepish of the sheep, so the Bond market correction will attract the “savings” of a large group of complete morons who don’t understand that rising interest rates will make that income worth nothing in real terms.

      Second, the markets are expecting another Chinese rate hike this week, so that move is being anticipated by those who are looking to enter into the Yuan carry trade.

      My question is: can (and will) forced, policy based interest rate hikes in China be matched by natural bond market rate hikes in the US as the bond vigalantes set their minds to turning that big, fat US Treasury market pig into Christmas ham?

      If so, then all the sheep who think they are so smart to be moving into an interest rate carry trade might just be getting themselves ready to be served with mint jelly and string beans on Easter Sunday.

      Expect this correction in the metals to be sharp, steep, and short lived. Gold and Silver futures are already in backwardation, and rising premiums in the retail bullion market are implying that the backwardation is even more severe in real terms than the futures market is even letting on.

      My positions in TBT and DXKSX have acted as the perfect hedge to my silver and gold driven declines the past two days… whoda thunk it?

  • mario cavolo December 8, 2010, 11:11 am

    ….every reasonably intelligent soul on this board knows that if and when a compelling trend of rising interest rates kicks in for whatever reasons, manipulations, or trends, hell will seem a like a hot tropical day at the beach with palm trees swaying in the balmy breeze in comparison.

    • Robert December 8, 2010, 7:09 pm

      Here’s the rub:

      Up until now in this little party, the Fed has been creating the dollars and enjoying the false security that the banks have been keeping those Trillions “on reserve” so that they can not escape into the market to crank up price levels.

      If Bond yields rise, and the Treasury keeps printing bonds to continue funding Washington Disney-C crazy antics, and if savers buy those bonds and hold them to maturity, then the power to influence the general price level moves away from the Fed, and out into the open markets- the net result being what we all fear most: rising prices in the face of economic stagnation.

  • Jill December 8, 2010, 7:48 am

    He could, indirectly. He could just print enough dollars to buy lots of it. I wonder if he will ever try to do that. The world is already drowning in dollars. What’s a few trillion more?

  • Lee December 8, 2010, 5:22 am

    Bernanke can’t print gold.

    • VegasBob December 8, 2010, 6:42 am

      Bernokio’s inability to print gold will prove to be his Achilles Heel.

    • Gabez December 8, 2010, 3:43 pm

      This reverse-Midas will end up digesting his own bills, followed by a sudden diarrhea that will send his rear (and himself) down the toilette.

  • Benjamin December 8, 2010, 5:20 am

    I tried to follow the 60 Minutes interview, but of late I’ve found myself increasingly unable to speak/interpret the languages of bankers.

    All I can really say anymore with absolute certainty is that bankers are so full of recycled excrement (if you know what I mean… EEEWWW!) that there’s little point in even trying to see things their way. Just bang the gavel and say “judgement for the plaintiff…”

    (which would/should be all that aren’t bankers and politicians, but really, since it’s their damn theory of everything, forced on us, I guess I should say the defendant, huh?).

    But despite my fading understanding for the pleas and promises of the dying beast, let me see if I got this right…

    a) Because the central banks are certain to buy government debt, money over the decades has gone into Treasurys (as evidenced by the 30 year bull trend in bond price).

    b) The fall in productive investment on top of government spending has left everything in serious debt (to put it lightly).

    c) So now, apparently, the trend is reversing. The pigs in the bond market are now begging for mercy, and demanding a real return, rather than more price increase of the debt instrument (The economy can bear no more of this farcical investment vehicle? I would say so. Stupidity cannot run eternal!)

    d) But since the debt is both real and on paper, the high interest rates are the wrecking ball to the whole tippsy tower atop the foundation of, uh… runny excrement…

    e) So, we’re all [bleeped] in this system.

    I don’t know where money printing (or not, as Bernanke contends) falls in all that. All I know is that debt levels have been driven right into inescapable apex of the black hole, all because of “can do”, demon-cratic governance driven by central banking. That much should be apparent to even the dunderest of dunderheads among the human species!

    But no. There’s beyond dunderheaded in the world, expressed most in the nonthinking media. They’re all trapped in the waxing and waning of black, white, and grey, knowing nothing of colors. And because everything is over their heads, so many people just aren’t made to realize that the “barbaric relics” are the solution. They are the future, weather anyone likes it or not. Anyone who doesn’t think so… Good luck escaping the “oppression” of blue, red, and green for all of time (fools…)!

  • SDavid December 8, 2010, 4:44 am

    What happens to the price of gold if this scenario plays out as you suggest?

    • Rick Ackerman December 8, 2010, 5:29 am

      Gold wins no matter what scenario unfolds. Wait, there is one exception: all bets are off if economic, financial, political and monetary stability suddenly break out around the world.