Taking their cue from our cautiously optimistic, if factually challenged, Fed chairman, mainstream purveyors of news have been spewing propaganda for months about a “recovery” in the second half. But do investors actually believe this poppycock? We never would have imagined so, at least not before Thursday. But when the broad averages plunged on weak payroll numbers released ahead of the holiday, they buttressed the conclusion that Wall Street was genuinely surprised by the economy’s punk performance. How punk? In percentage terms, unemployment increased by just a tenth of a percentage point, to 9.5%. But what seemed to throw investors for a loop was a spurt in job losses, which totaled 467,000 last month. That is significantly higher than in May, suggesting that the jobs component of the economy is getting worse, not better.
This could not have surprised those who get their economic news from newsletters rather than from the major networks, CNBC, and other officially sanctioned mouthpieces of the status quo. In general the newsletter world has been far more bearish on the economy than prime-time peddlers of the Commerce Department’s statistical swill. While the latter tend to interpret, say, a moderate slowing of the collapse in home prices for a month or two as great news for the builders and for the economy as a whole, the latter tend to see a meaningless statistical blip. Speaking for ourselves, you could say we see the glass as half-full – but of hemlock. One economic fact alone should give any optimist pause, to wit: There are at least a half-dozen state governments teetering on the edge of bankruptcy – including California, the world’s sixth largest economy — and quite a few more in very serious distress. Under the circumstances, it seems incredible that anyone besides Kudlow or Abby Cohen – which is to say, two of Wall Street’s most recklessly self-aggrandizing shills – would expect payroll numbers and joblessness to show steady signs of improvement.
Stocks Extremely Vulnerable
So if the economy is about to relapse, what might that portend for stocks? We think the broad averages are extremely vulnerable, especially if tech-sector earnings for Q2 fail to live up to the speculative binge that goosed Nasdaq stocks in particular. The potential for extreme disappointment is even greater in the financial sector. Some of you may recall that the current bear rally in stocks was touched off by news in early March that Citicorp had mysteriously “earned” more than a billion dollars. This fueled explosive buying in the financial sector that has since flattened ominously. Are investors once again growing fearful that the banks, even those that “passed” the stress test, face a mark-to-market somewhere down the road? If so, it’s hard to imagine which stocks will lead the next charge.
(If you’d like to have Rick’s Picks commentary delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)
I know this is off subject, but did you all hear of the Rolling Stones article SLAMMING Goldman? I hope it really gets passed around. Also, I laughed myself into stomach pains from a brief article in this months Futures Magazine. Seems like GS is joining the upstart exchange ELX. One sentence says: ” Goldman joining is a vote of support for the venture.” HA!HA!HA!HA! Just another market they can manipulate if you ask me!