Why Working Stiffs Envy the Mailman

Years ago, we wrote here that white collar workers would one day grow jealous of the mailman. It would appear that that day has finally arrived. Why the envy? For one, the mailman enjoys the kind of job security that most workers in the private sector sacrificed years ago. For two, the mailman’s healthcare package is comparable to what top executives receive.  Third, he can retire fifteen years earlier than you with benefits that make yours look stingy.  And four, there are all those paid holidays, sunshine and fresh air. mailmanWill envy of these perks turn to resentment if government employees continue to cruise through economic hard times with relatively few layoffs and pay cuts? It may be happening already. Consider the news from financially strapped California, where State Assembly leaders recently awarded pay raises totaling $551,000 to 136 staff members. This brazen affront to taxpayers follows Gov. Schwarzenegger’s request that the Legislature cut its budget by 10 percent to match savings from other departments. The raises come just a month before Californians will be voting on six budget-related measures in a special election. Is the Assembly trying to commit political suicide? Our old chum Glenn Klotz, a staunch libertarian and inveterate blogger, notes the bipartisan nature of these insensitive and unseemly policy decisions in a recent commentary, Public vs. Private. Here’s what he had to say about a trend that obviously cannot continue for long: 

New Jersey Sinking Fast

“An editorial in the Atlantic City Press today pointed to a huge and growing gap in New Jersey between public and private sector employment. It noted that the state’s public employees on average make $11/hour more then their private-sector counterparts in overall compensation. Is this discrepancy sustainable in a supposedly capitalistic society? It appears that in New Jersey, the proverbial cart ( the public sector) has somehow gotten in front of the horse ( the private sector.)  I recall reading that in the early 1900s, New Jersey’s entire state workforce was in the low hundreds. Today it is nearing 90,000! Granted, there were far fewer people in 1908, but nevertheless the ratio between public and private workers appears to be growing wildly out of whack. This might help to explain why New Jersey is almost hopelessly buried in debt and going bankrupt.

Public Contracts

“Add to this equation all the other thousands of jobs that depend on public contracts given to private companies. These companies in many cases simply wouldn’t exist without public funding and could be classified as quasi-public employment.

“Bottom line, New Jersey’s rapidly expanding public sector is being fueled by a quickly contracting private sector in the midst of a deepening Great Recession. Here’s another scary fact: Public employees are twice as likely to be represented by a labor union. I’m generally pro-union, but in the public sector, where the system is not tied to profitability and politicians manipulate the system to reward their patrons, where is there any incentive to manage the situation?”

(If you’d like to have Rick’s Picks commentary delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)   

  • Rich April 27, 2009, 7:21 pm

    LOL
    Maybe not until after COT commercials and 4 largest Bank traders cover shorts.
    AP Giannini walked the 17 miles to San Francisco when the San Francisco 1906 Earthquake derailed the Peninsula Train. He turned North Beach Bank of Italy into Bank of America and the world by taking his gold and silver coins out of Crocker-Woolworth to avoid the San Francisco Earthquake Fires, hiding them in orange crates on a horse drawn wagon, and stashing them in the ash firebox of his San Mateo chimney. He made loans on the sidewalk in front of his bank with a plank, two barrels, a handshake and hidden gold and silver reserves. Every one of them was repaid…

    http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/Favorites.CServlet?obj=ID3251493

    Meanwhile darn derivative FAZ burning a hole in accounts everywhere.
    Seems ETFs behaving more like volatility driven option premiums….

    http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/Favorites.CServlet?obj=ID3251493

  • Rich April 23, 2009, 9:58 pm

    Aloha All

    Good points. Recently passed dad triple dipped with Navy and Engineering career plus Social Security as a notch baby. Since Social Security COLA was redefined down, it is a good thing he knew how to invest and passed it forward.

    Been wondering why bonds, gold and silver haven’t taken off and stocks kept climbing the proverbial wall of worry. Did some high altitude thinking.

    Beside glaring COT positions by commercials and big banks, a look at http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data says an awful lot.

    The CPI and M-3 money supply took another jump down the mountain of debt. No doubt shadow banks like AXP, F, GE, GM are contracting credit supply even faster.

    So the real 64 Trillion dollar question remains where to put our money here now in a hyperinflationary depression?

    It looks like John Q has figured out buying physical gold and silver at premiums may be a non-starter, particularly if they have to take a Krugerrand to the corner grocery for a loaf of bread and change.

    And institutional whales know gold and silver stocks and bullion are such a small percent of global debt and equity capitalizations, that they cannot herd in without getting beached. So far most are unable or unwilling to vizualize $30,000 or even $3000 gold, let alone silver, where the WEB slinger reportedly got exercised and called away writing covered options.

    Never fear. Some time this summer we announce patented working cash, silver, gold, platinum coin ATMs to solve the problem.

    Meanwhile, we never argue with higher stronger trends:

    http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/Favorites.CServlet?obj=ID3251493

    Aloha Regards*Rich

    &&&&&

    Gresham’s Law suggests that each and every ATM dispensing gold and/or platinum coins will need 8″ of armor and two heavily armed guards. RA

  • D Graham April 23, 2009, 2:55 pm

    The disparity between taxes paid and services delivered got so wide for me that I left California last year. I was a 24 year, top tax bracket payer to the franchise tax board for most of those years. Not boasting, just stating facts for relevance. Given that the public schools were unacceptable , particularly at the high school, we had little choice, but to move. The private schools were as expensive as college, tax rates were close to 25% for state and local obligations, I simply said “Tax this.” And left. I suspect that I will not be alone. The market has a way of finding equilibrium and I think we are seeing that happen, albeit very slowly. What will be interesting is how it gets there. California had a come-to-Jesus-Moment a couple of months ago and it made absolutely no changes to the fundamental problem: Government Gone Wild. This stuff moves at an amazingly slow pace……and then the dam breaks.
    In Atlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand’s fictional piece about government gone wild, it took almost 12 years for the situation to go from completely disgusted taxpayer to resolution. Probably not a bad guesstimate. If we are just now at the beginning of the disgust phase, we have a very, very long frustrating episode ahead of us. Who knows how many tens of thousands of pages of legislation lay ahead of us? The pension reform act. The public worker rights act. The taxpayer fairness act. The non-citizen tax exemption act. The blah, blah, blah act. Soon expensive tax states will put in some penalty for moving to a less expensive tax state. (Sorry to give the man ideas…)

    Watch the glacier. It is moving, and it is carving deep, Yosemite like valleys in society. While it is moving why not pick up Rand’s opus? It reads like a diary of today….

    Some facts: In the 30’s government was 10% of the economy. In the late 40’s it had doubled to 22% (This was part of Rand’s inspiration since she wrote it in the 50’s). Today it is right about 50% (who knows, given that we are having massive private sector job cuts?). It has been largely financed through sleight of hand borrowing, therefore, it makes even more sense that it will meet an ugly ending. This is simply not sustainable. Just because it has worked for a great while does not mean it will work forever. I imagine it will be an epic train crash which will produce the mother of all virtual rubbernecking as we look on with amazement upon something that was completely predictable (and preventable).

    GDX, GLD, SLV awfully perky today…:)

  • rico April 23, 2009, 11:39 am

    I wouldn’t get too worked up over all this. I’m a plumbing contractor and it seems the only projects around are tied to some government entity. If the Feds keep spending our money like they have been the only new jobs in the future will be working for the government in one way or another!

    &&&&&

    Great! CETA passed me by in the 1970s, but it always looked like the workers were having so much f-u-n. RA

  • donniemac April 23, 2009, 11:09 am

    A right-on article. My father is a triple dipper, Military and Civil Service retirement and Social Security, and there is no way I will ever have as good a retirement economically as his. At one time, he and one of my brothers worked for the government, and my other brother was in retail sales, I used to tell them that I was supporting them as I was the only one working in manufacturing. I was the only one adding value to the whole economic process. And this is where the collective we seem to have gotten lost. It is not shuffling money around on Wall Street or creating a demand that makes prices go up, it is the process of taking something in a rawer state and improving that item that creates wealth. The US needs to get back to making things and being a net producer nation instead of a gross consumer nation!

  • George Drake April 23, 2009, 8:30 am

    I certainly agree with the thrust of the article, but as New Jersey has about 9 million population, it’s hard to believe only 1% work for the state! This has to be the tip of the iceberg; since the public sector preempts a great percentage of the national income. The “mailman” referred to is not a New Jersey public employee. One supposes the schoolteachers in New Jersey are not included as state employees, either. But, in California, a great many people are employed by the state university systems. Agreed, much state spending could be on contracts with private firms and givebacks to counties and local units, but if it were only anything like 1%, the states wouldn’t be going broke. The article quoted is therefore biased , because the shallow reporting and lack of factual background favors the big spenders wanting more government intrusion in everyone’s lives.

    George

  • D Hauer April 23, 2009, 7:13 am

    Government spending is wildly out-of-control and government’s financial obligations are also out-of-control. This why NJ has some of the highest property taxes in the US (I think that Conn. might be worse). Let’s face it, between the unrealistically high wages, benefits and most of all… PENSION OBLIGATIONS, there is NO WAY that NJ or many other state governments can ever hope to balance their books and keep taxes at reasonable levels. This is why they go after property! The Federal Government is even worse and many local governments are in similar sad shape. Mismanagement, malfeasance and incompetence rule the day. What good are the so-called actuaries is their advice is bad or if they do give good advice and it isn’t followed? BTW – the systemic fraud generatedby Wall St and investment banks has also played a MAJOR role in wiping out (i.e. stealing/defrauding) billion$ from government and private sector pension funds. Yet, no one is going to jail. In the end, it is the PRIVATE sector that really produces value and brings home the bacon’… only to be robbed senselessly by government at all levels.

  • David April 23, 2009, 4:56 am

    Boy, you sure hit a sore point with me! I used to look at most gov’t jobs as being a little better than welfare (at least the guy has to “work” for it). Nowadays the pay & benefits are in many cases better than the public sector. Work 20 years and sit back & enjoy retirement. Even better if your spouse works at a gov’t agency as well. There’s people that work, retire & then go back to work in the same office doing the same job working on their second retirement I suppose –How does that work? And don’t even get me started on the public schools.
    I enjoy your site Rick!

  • Bill April 23, 2009, 4:00 am

    That’s just the half of it. Retire around 50 with a salary with cost of living increases for the rest of retiree’s life. Free Blue Cross medical AND DENTAL for the rest of retiree’s life. Spouse also receives Blue Cross medical and dental for the rest of spouse’s life(current rate, $121 per month in Alabama for spouse of retiree)